by Amanda Bohman / abohman@newsminer.com
7 months ago | 2599 views | 16

|
16 
|
|
FAIRBANKS — Both wells that feed North Pole’s city water system have come up positive for trace amounts of the industrial chemical sulfolane, but a top water quality official for the state says there is no public health emergency.
The state has not recommended that people stop drinking the water.
“The treatment of the city water (in North Pole) appears to be taking the sulfolane out of the city water,” Alaska drinking water program manager Cindy Christian said.
“Obviously, we would like to have none of this in the water. I don’t think it’s a public health emergency.”
The amount of sulfolane found in the North Pole tests is so slight — less than 10 parts per billion — that some tests have come up negative, officials said.
The city’s wells are deeper than most private wells, which have detected sulfolane amounts in the low hundreds of parts per billion. Only one of the city’s wells is in use, normal for the city at this time of year.
Sulfolane is a chemical used in fuel production. The spill that caused the contamination happened before 2000, according to state officials. Flint Hills bought the refinery in 2004.
The number of contaminated private wells in North Pole is believed to be about 55, according to Ann Farris, project manager for the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation. Eighty-five have been tested.
The amounts detected in wells throughout North Pole vary, starting in the teens and in one case surpassing 400 parts per billion. Most wells are below 200 parts per billion, Farris said. One part per billion is on par with a drop of water in an Olympic-sized swimming pool.
Testing on public wells in Fairbanks, meanwhile, showed no sulfolane, Christian said.
Samples in Fairbanks were taken from the well supplying Golden Heart Utilities and College Utilities Corp. as well as the drinking water well at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, according to Christian. All of them came back “non-detect.” Testing of the drinking water well on Eielson Air Force Base is pending.
“We expected that they would be non-detect but we just wanted to make sure,” Christian said.
Officials believe the water table contamination, which originated at the Flint Hills Resources refinery in North Pole, stops where the Old Richardson Highway joins the Richardson Highway near Hawks Greenhouse. Wells were dug there on Monday and water samples taken Wednesday to confirm the northern boundary of the contamination, according to Flint Hills spokesman Jeff Cook.
State officials are working on determining an acceptable level of sulfolane for drinking water and expect to have that number next month. They are dealing with a lot of unknowns, namely a lack of information on the health effects of long-term exposure to small amounts of sulfolane.
In California, a water quality control board deemed 57 parts per billion of sulfolane acceptable in drinking water. The state of Alaska’s groundwater cleanup standard for sulfolane is 350 parts per billion.
Laboratory animals exposed to very high levels of the chemical have shown changes to organs, the nervous system and the immune system, according to state officials.
the health official Dr. Lori Verbrugge the toxicologist can come up with answers that we will accept. I for one will not except a off the wall number, a number that THEY DECIDE is safe,(without any human study). No one should . As for the monitoring wells I received very large maps from Marti Early DEC Juneau, The MW 115 is the closest to Laurence Rd,and MW 149B for Evolyn is a distance off. The plume is traveling in a Northwest direction, flowing with the Tanana. The spill happened many years ago, DEC knew about this spill, why didn't they study sulfolane contamination then?.
Once they found it in the City of North Pole city water, they had no choice they had to inform all the people in the North Pole area. Many people with private wells have complained for years about their wells and a gas like smell and taste. DEC said they didnt have the money to test the private wells back then, and saying anyone could have contaminated there own property. This Sulfolane investigation came to be, becuse it was found in the City of North Pole Wells . God only knows how long the private wells have been contaminated with Sulfolane, how long have we been consuming this chemical? Flint Hill and DEC have alot to answer to, Please call R.H. Bradley "citizen action committee" 455-8388 There is power in numbers, let your voice be heard.
After talking to him, I believe they have not tested anything East of the old Richardson highway. On their maps they also show no test wells to the east of the highway. Though he did say they tested on Lawrence rd. I can find no proof of it.
There is power in number, call Robert Bradley, Citizen Action Committee 455-8388 NO ATTORNEYS Involved. You Have A Voice, Use It.
Just because you sit on Council doesn't make you any more enlightened than anyone else here. I too live in the effected area and an on City water and are being effected by this.
I have wondered why the city pays for bottled water when there is supposedly good enough stuff coming out the tap for you to sip.... course it's just more tax payers dollars being spent soooo wisely.
I don't believe any detectable chemicals in our water is a positive, and hope that the City and State continue to push Flint Hills to clean up.
Years ago they tested all the miner's in Ester for arsenic in the water. They never found much, if any, but then no one in Ester drank water.
Nobody has said what the stuff does in the Flint Hill's recipe. Does anyone know?
It's the water, I tell you. That's the only explanation for North Pole that I've ever been able to muster up.
Anybody out there think maybe our State government would mislead us in any way? Think big money might influence our State government?
Government is always corrupt and ineffective, right? Better go vote for a tea-bagger to save us.
And I love the comment below about it not being Flint Hills problem there Glacierwolf. I'm sure everyone in a resource extraction or waste producing business wants you to run the EPA for us. Better yet, how about a Supreme Court appointment for you so you can bring your sharp legal mind to bear on the issues.
Did you fail to read eariler stories or visit the DEC website to learn the spill(s) happened 15 years before Flint Hills bought the property? To say this is Flint Hills issue, problem or error would be the same as your son or daughter buying a used car - and then automatically becoming responsible for the accidents the previous owner had.
Flint Hills has no responsibility beyond their property line. Yeet they are digging test wells, hiring people to cordinate the efforts, and providing bottled water for the affected residents. And paying for it. They do not have to do this.
Oh, and I live in the effected area just outside the fence.
.
Bet it will remain "safe" until the refinery finally shuts down.