North Pole water deemed safe to drink
by Amanda Bohman / abohman@newsminer.com
7 months ago | 2599 views | 16 16 comments | 16 16 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Geologist Andrea Carlson of Shannon & Wilson, Inc. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants, takes a water sample from a test well off of Champion Avenue in North Pole to be tested for the industrial contaminate sulfolane Wednesday afternoon, January 20, 2010. Eric Engman/News-Miner
view image
FAIRBANKS — Both wells that feed North Pole’s city water system have come up positive for trace amounts of the industrial chemical sulfolane, but a top water quality official for the state says there is no public health emergency.

The state has not recommended that people stop drinking the water.

“The treatment of the city water (in North Pole) appears to be taking the sulfolane out of the city water,” Alaska drinking water program manager Cindy Christian said.

“Obviously, we would like to have none of this in the water. I don’t think it’s a public health emergency.”

The amount of sulfolane found in the North Pole tests is so slight — less than 10 parts per billion — that some tests have come up negative, officials said.

The city’s wells are deeper than most private wells, which have detected sulfolane amounts in the low hundreds of parts per billion. Only one of the city’s wells is in use, normal for the city at this time of year.

Sulfolane is a chemical used in fuel production. The spill that caused the contamination happened before 2000, according to state officials. Flint Hills bought the refinery in 2004.

The number of contaminated private wells in North Pole is believed to be about 55, according to Ann Farris, project manager for the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation. Eighty-five have been tested.

The amounts detected in wells throughout North Pole vary, starting in the teens and in one case surpassing 400 parts per billion. Most wells are below 200 parts per billion, Farris said. One part per billion is on par with a drop of water in an Olympic-sized swimming pool.

Testing on public wells in Fairbanks, meanwhile, showed no sulfolane, Christian said.

Samples in Fairbanks were taken from the well supplying Golden Heart Utilities and College Utilities Corp. as well as the drinking water well at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, according to Christian. All of them came back “non-detect.” Testing of the drinking water well on Eielson Air Force Base is pending.

“We expected that they would be non-detect but we just wanted to make sure,” Christian said.

Officials believe the water table contamination, which originated at the Flint Hills Resources refinery in North Pole, stops where the Old Richardson Highway joins the Richardson Highway near Hawks Greenhouse. Wells were dug there on Monday and water samples taken Wednesday to confirm the northern boundary of the contamination, according to Flint Hills spokesman Jeff Cook.

State officials are working on determining an acceptable level of sulfolane for drinking water and expect to have that number next month. They are dealing with a lot of unknowns, namely a lack of information on the health effects of long-term exposure to small amounts of sulfolane.

In California, a water quality control board deemed 57 parts per billion of sulfolane acceptable in drinking water. The state of Alaska’s groundwater cleanup standard for sulfolane is 350 parts per billion.

Laboratory animals exposed to very high levels of the chemical have shown changes to organs, the nervous system and the immune system, according to state officials.
comments (16)
« theskiesthelimilt wrote on Friday, Jan 22 at 01:08 AM »
Helllooo Icedberg, don't under-estimate Mr. Cook, long time Alaskan family, raised in Fairbanks, local schools,local businessman, his brother is with the law firm Cook Schuhmann & Groseclose Inc. Mr. Cook is the spokesman for Flint Hill, he's not my favorite person at this moment, and glad I'm not him but I still admired the man. Mr. Cook is doing his job, he is the spokesperson,the peacekeeper, he is the pacifier, we are the hurt and angry child, his job is to tend to us until

the health official Dr. Lori Verbrugge the toxicologist can come up with answers that we will accept. I for one will not except a off the wall number, a number that THEY DECIDE is safe,(without any human study). No one should . As for the monitoring wells I received very large maps from Marti Early DEC Juneau, The MW 115 is the closest to Laurence Rd,and MW 149B for Evolyn is a distance off. The plume is traveling in a Northwest direction, flowing with the Tanana. The spill happened many years ago, DEC knew about this spill, why didn't they study sulfolane contamination then?.

Once they found it in the City of North Pole city water, they had no choice they had to inform all the people in the North Pole area. Many people with private wells have complained for years about their wells and a gas like smell and taste. DEC said they didnt have the money to test the private wells back then, and saying anyone could have contaminated there own property. This Sulfolane investigation came to be, becuse it was found in the City of North Pole Wells . God only knows how long the private wells have been contaminated with Sulfolane, how long have we been consuming this chemical? Flint Hill and DEC have alot to answer to, Please call R.H. Bradley "citizen action committee" 455-8388 There is power in numbers, let your voice be heard.
report abuse
« icedberg wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 04:07 PM »
I called them today, Jeff Cook doesn't even know what direction Fairbanks is from North Pole.

After talking to him, I believe they have not tested anything East of the old Richardson highway. On their maps they also show no test wells to the east of the highway. Though he did say they tested on Lawrence rd. I can find no proof of it.

report abuse
« theskiesthelimilt wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 04:02 PM »
Glacierwolf has been drinking the water!! First of all Flint Hill bought the problem when they bought the refinery!they knew about the prior spills, THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE!! When the problem left there property line they became responsible for all damages to all effected property and persons, If you think paying for bottled water, or digging wells is expensive just wait for the class action lawsuits to begin. Our health, our future health, our property value, YES FLINT HILL IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL!

There is power in number, call Robert Bradley, Citizen Action Committee 455-8388 NO ATTORNEYS Involved. You Have A Voice, Use It.
report abuse
« Sweet71 wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 02:05 PM »
Kevin oops I mean Glacierwolf (wonder why you don't post using your real name anymore) I never cease to be amazed by your completely condescending tone in all of your posts.

Just because you sit on Council doesn't make you any more enlightened than anyone else here. I too live in the effected area and an on City water and are being effected by this.

I have wondered why the city pays for bottled water when there is supposedly good enough stuff coming out the tap for you to sip.... course it's just more tax payers dollars being spent soooo wisely.

I don't believe any detectable chemicals in our water is a positive, and hope that the City and State continue to push Flint Hills to clean up.
report abuse
« Samm_redux wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 01:17 PM »
Is that possible Mackie? ;-)
report abuse
« mackie1 wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 11:27 AM »
Beer sales should go up.
report abuse
« Dogwatcher wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 10:21 AM »
That's why they are gouging us at the pump. They are building up their assets to pay off the lawsuit. Jeff's Cooking, John's Cogging, and Ms. Tammy's the waitress at the North Pole Sulfaloin Steakhouse.

Years ago they tested all the miner's in Ester for arsenic in the water. They never found much, if any, but then no one in Ester drank water.

Nobody has said what the stuff does in the Flint Hill's recipe. Does anyone know?

report abuse
« anonymous wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 09:50 AM »
Where I used to work people who were of normal intelligence would transfer out to North Pole and suddenly become flaky and illogical. We always wondered if it was something in the water, because we couldn't find any other explanation.
report abuse
« TheAlaskaCurmudgeon wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 09:05 AM »
I don't care what anyone says. I will not, under any circumstances, drink the water in North Pole. I have lived by that credo ever since the day I first encountered that town.

It's the water, I tell you. That's the only explanation for North Pole that I've ever been able to muster up.
report abuse
« TheAntiClinger wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 08:00 AM »
How about this one clingers. Big bad nasty government says "treatment of the city water ... appears to be taking the sulfolane out of the city water". Appears to or does or is that a good solid maybe at the moment?

Anybody out there think maybe our State government would mislead us in any way? Think big money might influence our State government?

Government is always corrupt and ineffective, right? Better go vote for a tea-bagger to save us.

And I love the comment below about it not being Flint Hills problem there Glacierwolf. I'm sure everyone in a resource extraction or waste producing business wants you to run the EPA for us. Better yet, how about a Supreme Court appointment for you so you can bring your sharp legal mind to bear on the issues.

report abuse
« ChenaSteamer wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 07:55 AM »
North Pole City Hall employees and North Pole City Council members have been drinking bottled water that is kept in stock at the North Pole City Hall kitchen for several years. And thats a fact, make of it what you will.
report abuse
« Shokd wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 07:50 AM »
Yum! Thanks, DEC! Where do you folks live again....?
report abuse
« Glacierwolf wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 06:47 AM »
Nice how the uninformed feel the need to blog here.

Did you fail to read eariler stories or visit the DEC website to learn the spill(s) happened 15 years before Flint Hills bought the property? To say this is Flint Hills issue, problem or error would be the same as your son or daughter buying a used car - and then automatically becoming responsible for the accidents the previous owner had.

Flint Hills has no responsibility beyond their property line. Yeet they are digging test wells, hiring people to cordinate the efforts, and providing bottled water for the affected residents. And paying for it. They do not have to do this.

Oh, and I live in the effected area just outside the fence.
report abuse
« socom wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 06:10 AM »
Why no photo of Cindy drinking a glass of sulfolane water? This story increases my distrust of DEC officials. Could it be that the real agenda is to protect Flint Hills?
report abuse
« anonymous wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 12:38 AM »
I agree, truthinnews. Easy to say it's safe if you don't have to drink it.

.
report abuse
« truthinnews wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 12:27 AM »
So if "state officials are working to determine an acceptable level of sulfolane for drinking water" how can you say it is safe.

Bet it will remain "safe" until the refinery finally shuts down.
report abuse
Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.