UAF researchers use drones to evaluate sea ice thickness at Nome and aid incoming tanker
by Reba Lean/rlean@newsminer.com
Jan 10, 2012 | 8679 views | 26 26 comments | 29 29 recommendations | email to a friend | print
An Aeryon Scout, a four-propeller unmanned aerial vehicle, returns to Nome on Monday, Jan. 9, 2012, after surveying the sea ice near the town s harbor. University of Alaska Fairbanks researchers from the Geophysical Institute arrived in Nome to prepare for the arrival of the Russian fuel tanker, Renda. Jessica Cherry photo
An Aeryon Scout, a four-propeller unmanned aerial vehicle, returns to Nome on Monday, Jan. 9, 2012, after surveying the sea ice near the town's harbor. University of Alaska Fairbanks researchers from the Geophysical Institute arrived in Nome to prepare for the arrival of the Russian fuel tanker, Renda. Jessica Cherry photo
slideshow
An Aeryon Scout, a four-propeller unmanned aerial vehicle, is being used in Nome on Monday, Jan. 9, 2012, to survey the sea ice near the town s harbor. University of Alaska Fairbanks researchers from the Geophysical Institute arrived in Nome to prepare for the arrival of the Russian fuel tanker, Renda. Jessica Cherry photo
An Aeryon Scout, a four-propeller unmanned aerial vehicle, is being used in Nome on Monday, Jan. 9, 2012, to survey the sea ice near the town's harbor. University of Alaska Fairbanks researchers from the Geophysical Institute arrived in Nome to prepare for the arrival of the Russian fuel tanker, Renda. Jessica Cherry photo
slideshow
FAIRBANKS — Camera-equipped drones flew over Nome this week to help a Russian fuel tanker, the Renda, get a perspective on the sea ice near the town’s harbor.

The Renda is sailing to Nome to deliver fuel. The town’s supply is expected to run out before spring. The tanker is accompanied by U.S. Coast Guard icebreaker Healy, which opens paths for the tanker.

Nome’s harbor is too shallow for Healy to enter, and the Renda will have to fare on its own to unload its fuel.

Researchers from the University of Alaska Fairbanks’ Geophysical Institute arrived in Nome to help evaluate the ice near the harbor last week.

Andy Mahoney, a research assistant professor of geophysics, analyzed the ice outside the harbor and got a read on some of the pressure ridges’ thickness. Pressure ridges are created by ice pushing up against other ice, creating miniature mountain ranges. One was 25 feet thick.

Greg Walker, manager at the Geophysical Institute’s Poker Flat Research Range, arrived in Nome to provide more information on the sea ice outside of town using unmanned aircraft owned by BP Alaska. The small “drones” are about the size of smoke detectors, with four arms with propellors attached. A camera is positioned at the bottom of the craft.

Walker and his research assistants flew the aircraft around the harbor, snapping shots that will be sent to the Renda.

Jessica Cherry, a research assistant professor who also traveled to Nome, said the drones are used to monitor the situation, “especially in ice conditions where there’s the potential for an oil spill.”
Comments
(26)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
ExPatAlaskan
|
January 12, 2012
The polar ice caps are disappearing, that's a different thing then winter ice.

As for getting the fuel in when its ice free, this happened because the ice came early.

I imagine that they get smaller shipments throughout the summer topping off the tanks late in the fall.

This tanker may be over kill since they say they won't make it to "spring, If it was more dire I would think they would say, something like, "before February/March/..." But they don't need to unload all the fuel.

I am guessing that smaller tankers couldn't take the impact of the ice.

They may even loaded too much fuel on purpose so they have extra weight for getting back out.

I wonder if the cutter's draft is too deep could the tanker draft also be an issue?

88888
|
January 11, 2012
I hope someone thought to check and make sure Nome has enough fuel tanks to hold this 1.3 million gallons of fuel. :-)
ExPatAlaskan
|
January 12, 2012
This tanker may be over kill since they say they won't make it to "spring, If it was more dire I would think they would say, something like, "before February/March/..." But they don't need to unload all the fuel.

They may even loaded too much fuel on purpose so they have extra weight for getting back out.

Ravinred
|
January 11, 2012
The scary bit is this is the less expensive solution.
Yota99714
|
January 11, 2012
Well, the guys out at Poker Flats have been exploring different ways to use their drones beyond finding wildfire boundaries, so this was pretty cool to read.
Capt_Boblo
|
January 11, 2012
Let's see how much more money we can spend on this venture. Is someone keeping track of how much all of this this is costing?
Fairbanksgas
|
January 11, 2012
Maybe this year they will schedule a delivery during the 7 months that are ice free. We keep hearing how the arctic ice is disappearing so this should not even be an issue.
ExPatAlaskan
|
January 12, 2012
The polar ice caps are disappearing, that's a different thing then winter ice.

As for getting the fuel in when its ice free, this happened because the ice came early.

I imagine that they get smaller shipments throughout the summer topping off the tanks late in the fall.

TheAntiClinger
|
January 11, 2012
Sure hope none of the other airplanes flying around full of people with cameras don't hit that toy.
Yota99714
|
January 11, 2012
Flight pattern is under 500' MSL.
DistantThunder
|
January 11, 2012
Here's an interesting arctic-iceboat, did you see it last year ??..

http://photoblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/07/28/7190445-french-voyagers-prepare-for-trans-arctic-journey-on-hybrid-boat-through-ice-and-water

http://www.babouche-expe.eu/epresentation.html

It would be fun to build a much bigger boat like this.. a 100-foot long ice-sailboat that can sail over all ice conditions.. big enough to haul cargo all along the coast from Kaktovik to Kotzebue to Kodiak

Ukpeagvik Inupiat can build this in Barrow, we can build the parts in Fairbanks.
inupiatologist
|
January 11, 2012
Where are the Eskimos from Diomede Island to give directions,to the tanker/breaker. Kevin Cabinboy, get your Whaler/ Father-in-Law to guide these Coast Guards for environmental orientation of the Bering Sea ice/current movement. We need to start shipping from West Dock/Prudhoe to Kotz/Nome, Alaska coastal Eskimo communities to do,economic transportation/piping Planning, We need you Loretta Bullard.Wake-up Marie Greene-Local Boundaries for the Eskimos.
3rdGenerationFairbanks
|
January 11, 2012
This sounds like a high risk operation delivering the fuel through the ice. There are to many what ifs to list. If we poke a hole in this old russian tanker that is running poorly we will have another enviromental mess to deal with which will slow down any efforts we have on going to develop the oil proggress on the slope. Alaska we need to get it together. New roads to villages / develop our gas with spur lines to main villages etc.
aceandgary
|
January 11, 2012
Defund all sea ice research! We should only care about sea ice thickness when it affects people! Those rich fat cat scientists, they are just lining there pockets with governmental grants.I encourage all to write a letter to the POTUS demanding that scientific research that disagrees with my worldview be BANNED!
RapidFX
|
January 11, 2012
Awesome!
Justliberty
|
January 11, 2012
Still no cost comparison between this fuel delivery effort and simply delivering bulk fuel by air.

But more government agencies are getting in on the PR opportunity, so I guess that is good.
DistantThunder
|
January 11, 2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_Pelican

Anybody wanna help me build a Pelican amphib ??

WIG's are classified as boats, not planes..

FAA says they classify them as UFO's..

Coast Guard classifies them as "WTF ???"

Pelicans can skim over the ice at 230kts..

and haul 1400tons of LNG/LPG, or diesel.
Henry.
|
January 11, 2012
No numbrs, but this is vastly cheaper. The Renda is carrying 1.3 million gallons. Even the Everts DC-6 can't haul more than a few thousand gallons.
RapidFX
|
January 11, 2012
I'd like to see your facts. Aircraft can not carry millions of gallons. Do you have any idea how much it costs per hour to run an aircraft of size? No I do not think you do. Do you know how many gallons of fuel the large refuling craft can carry? People like you.. Everything is a conspiracy... Everything is a scam. Kill your TV.
TBirdAlaska
|
January 11, 2012
The Evergreen 747 Supertanker can haul 20,500 gallons. ( 65 X 20,500 ~ 1.3 million gallons )

I wonder what they would charge for 65 flights from Fairbanks to Nome.
Alaskansense
|
January 11, 2012
Given Nome's runway is only about 6000 feet, and the 747 Supertanker requires an 8000 ft runway, I rather doubt its owner would agree to use it.
88888
|
January 11, 2012
RapidFX, do you know the difference between an aircraft and a fuel tanker vessel?
Justliberty
|
January 11, 2012
Henry,

I don't think we can say that shipping this fuel via tanker is less expensive simply because the tanker holds more than an aircraft.

The tanker itself has been under contract for considerably longer than a normal trip.

The cost of operating the escort ice-breaker needs to be added in as well.

My point is that the media should ask about the cost instead of simply playing on the human interest story. If the cost is indeed reasonable, my hat's off to those who thought of the idea. I just suspect that air transportation would be less expensive.

Henry.
|
January 11, 2012
JustLiberty, I'll agree with you there--the cost of this operation should be reported.

However, without checking, I'd be willing to be this month's pay that using this tanker is substantially cheaper than air freight.

For reference, the DC-6 is the largest tanker that can readily land at OME, and it can carry up to 5,000 gallons, according to Everts. The Renda is hauling 1,300,000 gallons, which means you'd need at least 260 flights with the DC-6.

Cost-wise, the Renda displaces 6,600 tons DWT. Comparitively, the TI Europea, of the largest class of ships ever built, can be chartered for $146,000 / day. The Renda will conservatively be under charter for 30 days, so using the [much] larger vessel's rate, that's $4,380,000.

Conversely, a DC-6 tanker costs about $6.50 / gallon for a 550-mile flight (ANC-OME). Carrying 1.3M gallons would thus cost about $8,450,000.

Henry.
|
January 11, 2012
Continued.

I've used about the most conservative numbers available, and using the Renda is still significantly cheaper than air freight.

If you want to account for the Healy's time, you need to consider that it would be running already, and that this mission is in keeping with the USCG's charter. Plus, the is something like seventy times the size of the Renda, which would be massively cheaper to operate.

Convinced?
DistantThunder
|
January 11, 2012
http://icefloe.net/Aloftcon_Photos/albums/2012/20120111-0801.jpeg

Healey & Renda are now 99 nautical miles south of Nome..

If you look at the picture linked here it looks like the night-time city lights of Nome are barely visible from the pilothouse window of the Healy.. look on the right side of the picture on the horizon line.

The main-engine is running poorly on the Renda, it had a problem with the engine-valves in Dutch.. if somebody could air-drop some tanks of propane to the Renda it would add some extra-pep to the engine and reduce some of the black smoke belching from the stack..

..this propane-boost trick is used often in the old-classic tugboat races.
Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.