Cutting-edge techniques keep Fairbanks home toasty with almost no fuel
by Molly Rettig / mrettig@newsminer.com
Mar 13, 2011 | 13888 views | 50 50 comments | 67 67 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Karl Kassel explains the heat exchange system used to store and generate the heat for his family s home Wednesday, March 9, 2011. The battery storage bank behind him is charged with a photovoltaic array and a wind generator allowing them to live comfortably off the grid. Sam Harrel/News-Miner
Karl Kassel explains the heat exchange system used to store and generate the heat for his family's home Wednesday, March 9, 2011. The battery storage bank behind him is charged with a photovoltaic array and a wind generator allowing them to live comfortably off the grid. Sam Harrel/News-Miner
slideshow
The open design of the octogon home alows sunshine into the livingroom, dining area and kitchen of Karl Kassel s home Wednesday, March 9, 2011. Sam Harrel/News-Miner
The open design of the octogon home alows sunshine into the livingroom, dining area and kitchen of Karl Kassel's home Wednesday, March 9, 2011. Sam Harrel/News-Miner
slideshow
Karl Kassel sits on the hearth of his masonry heater, the centerpiece of his home, Wednesday, March 9, 2011, on Old Murphy Dome Road. The heater coupled with a passive solar design, solar collectors and a wind generator allow his family to live comfortably off the grid. Sam Harrel/News-Miner
Karl Kassel sits on the hearth of his masonry heater, the centerpiece of his home, Wednesday, March 9, 2011, on Old Murphy Dome Road. The heater coupled with a passive solar design, solar collectors and a wind generator allow his family to live comfortably off the grid. Sam Harrel/News-Miner
slideshow
This is the second of two stories about solar homes in Fairbanks. Both homes were built by Thorsten Chlupp to demonstrate and test the potential of renewable heating systems in Fairbanks. This article looks at the home of Karl Kassel, built in fall 2009.

FAIRBANKS — Karl Kassel fell in love with the site while ptarmigan hunting in 1975. At the top of Murphy Dome, his octagonal wood house overlooks Denali and Murphy Dome Valley. It was 2 below zero outside and 70 degrees inside when he woke up Wednesday. He hadn’t heated the home for three days.

Energy from his windows, solar photovoltaic panels, wind turbine and solar thermal panels was being stashed for next winter.

“If it stays sunny for the next several days, we’ll probably not have to light the fire again until October,” he said.

Kassel, his wife Billie and their 15-year-old son moved into the off-the-grid house last January.

“It’s crazy the amount of energy that’s available here in Fairbanks, that we waste,” said Kassel, who had been dreaming up the house since the 1970s. “I finally said, ‘I’m going to do this. It makes sense, the energy’s available, the efficient designs are here. We know how to do this. Why aren’t we?’”

So Kassel hired Thorsten Chlupp, general contractor and owner of Reina LLC, to build a highly efficient home that made the most of the area’s resources. They designed a house that combines passive solar design, renewable technologies and energy storage to make the variable sunlight in Fairbanks last almost the whole year. They are studying its performance to make the design more efficient, less expensive and less dependent on fossil fuels.

Passive design

The southern side of Kassel’s 1,800-square-foot house is mostly windows, letting in every drop of available sunlight.

The octagon is 20 percent more efficient than a square design because it has a lower surface-to-volume ratio and softer corners, which is where you lose the most heat, Chlupp said.

It was just as warm in the shadowed arctic entryway as by the sunny window.

“You don’t have any loss, you don’t have any drafts,” Chlupp said. “You can feel very comfortable in a house like this at 64, 66 degrees.”

The interior has an outdoors theme with tree sculptures, a free-form island in the kitchen and locally made birch cabinets with hand-picked rock handles. The house contains 16 tons of rock collected from river trips and a rock party. A blue river flows through sandy banks on the stained concrete floor and the living room is trimmed with plant beds containing two tons of dirt.

“We like being outside and floating rivers,” Kassel said. “So we designed the house to be like camping on a gravel bar.”

All of these items, plus nearly 13,000 gallons of hot water, are designed to absorb and save the maximum amount of heat.

Energy use

The heating system focuses on saving energy in the water tank for later use. Heat travels, via glycol, from solar thermal panels into loops in the floor and a 120-gallon domestic hot water tank in a closet. When Kassel starts a fire, coils in the masonry heater carry heat into the water tank. When the indoor tank hits 140 degrees, it diverts extra heat through a heat exchanger to a 12,000-gallon tank buried outside.

The electricity generated by a 1.6-kilowatt solar array and 3-kilowatt wind turbine first powers the refridgerator, water pumps and other utility needs. The system was producing 400 watts Wednesday afternoon and the house, with lights on, was only using 290. The extra power charged a battery bank sitting in the closet, which stores about three days worth of power, Kassel said.

Once the battery is full, wind and solar are channeled into an electric heating element to heat the water tank.

“The PV panels are awesome,” Kassel said. “They operate more efficiently in cold weather, and you get double sunlight because of the reflectivity off the snow.”

The wind is also a surprisingly steady resource, he said.

“There are many days I can hardly feel a breeze on the ground but my wind turbine is 80 feet up and it’s just humming.”

Energy patches

If there’s no sun, no wind and not enough heat in the water tank, it’s time for a fire. Kassel used two cords of wood in the last year to satisfy two-thirds of his heating demand. The rest came from a propane hot water heater.

He has a backup diesel generator, which only kicked on three times in the last year, to recharge the batteries.

He went through 170 gallons of propane — counting appliances — and expects to consume 20-30 gallons of diesel this year.

Better efficiency

Though the home already screams efficiency with 18-inch walls, triple-pane windows and efficient lighting, both Chlupp and Kassel are learning how to shave energy use — and costs — even more.

With bigger coils in the masonry heater, he wouldn’t need the propane. A thicker foundation, with a sandbed under the floor, would also cut heat demand, Kassel said.

“That’s a big lesson we learned here. We need more mass,” he said.

Chlupp wants to eliminate any unneeded part from the system.

“Simplification of the mechanical system is what I’m after — less pumps, less electricity, less things that can go wrong,” he said.

Payback

Kassel spent about $100,000 on the renewable energy systems, he said.

He received a $7,500 rebate from the state and is eligible for more than $20,000 in renewable energy tax credits through federal programs that give credits for 30 percent of renewable energy systems.

The rest should pay for itself within seven to 16 years, depending on the system, the conditions, the price of oil and many other factors, he said.

But he doesn’t focus just on payback.

“It’s the kind of investment that is hard to put a value on. ... When you paint your house, what’s the payback?” he asked.

You can’t quantify the creature comforts, small carbon footprint and stable energy costs, he said. Or knowing you have one of the most efficient homes around.

“Seven months in Fairbanks without heating your house. ... How many people in this town aren’t heating their house right now?”

Contact staff writer Molly Rettig at 459-7590.
Comments
(50)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
co-opmarket
|
March 17, 2011
At what I pay for fuel and electricity per year it would take 16 years to recoup the cost (after tax credits) at CURRENT fuel prices.

That's not too bad.
LostAlaskan99712
|
March 16, 2011
This is 2011, not 1800.

There is nothing that is made from crude oil that can't be made from something else. You people have simply been manipulated by oil executives [through the republican politicians they own] to believe that we "need" their crude oil to survive as a species, so the CEO's and their pets in Washington keep getting richer and RICHER while the loyal sheeple who naively support them can barely afford the perpetual rise in fuel costs, suckers.

"1) not in my life time

2) not in your life time.

3) not in the grand kids time."

See the selfish, greedy attitude? You people will be looked back on as the people who got in the way, or like the poeple who said Columbus was going to fall of the edge of the world. Either way.
1AhHa
|
March 15, 2011
« LostAlaskan99712 wrote on Tuesday, Mar 15 at 10:00 AM »

1AhHa- Crude oil is a finite (non-renewable, meaning there's only so much of it available for mankind to use) resource for energy.

--- replay

1) not in my life time

2) not in your life time.

3) not in the grand kids time.

4) most fuel is used for transportation or manufacturing.

NOT heating or electricity.

5) oil is essential because not one Kilowatt of Obama's green energy scam will fly a air plane, power a farm tractor, or turn into plastic.

6)FYI it takes about 35 kwh to replace one gallon of fuel.

7)electric cars us about 1 kwh per mile -- the best electric car you might buy may travel 30 miles on one charge. It would requires a 30 kwh battery.

8) Example Putting 1,000,000 electric cars on the road would require 1 kwh per single mile traveled. Which equals 1 billion watts per mile traveled by the 1,000,000 cars.

There is not enough electric power to supply them, much less recharge 1 million batteries at the same time.

Therefore:

We still need oil for trucks, machinery, airplanes etc.

We need oil to make the electric cars, solar panels, nuke plants, and practical every thing else.

9) Maybe someone will loan you a time machine which offer you an escape to 1800 rural Alaska. Where there is no oil products what so ever.

The locals back then will have you for dinner.



Pearl=W
|
March 15, 2011
I'd wanted to put an insulated heat-bank into my remote residence when I first built some 20 yrs ago, but couldn't afford it, with the cost/difficulty of transporting the materials. Even so, my south windows with insulated shutters and other heat-sink characteristics in my building, mean that from mid-Feb on I can get up in the morning to a comfortable house, build a little stick fire to make my coffee and breakfast, and then not fire the stove again until evening.

I am so happy to see these ideas finally being further developed, expanded, and researched for application in the Interior!! They've been around for a long time, but in this country people who thought them worthwhile have long been considered some sort of extreme nutcases.

LostAlaskan99712
|
March 15, 2011
1AhHa- Crude oil is a finite (non-renewable, meaning there's only so much of it available for mankind to use) resource for energy.

As human population increases so will the demand for oil, so don't expect oil to get any cheaper, like ever, and you can't blame it on "Obama" because he doesn't have a vested interest in oil, unlike the 'Oil presidents' George & George Bush. I remember gas prices skyrocketing long long before Obama was even thinking of running for the presidency.
1AhHa
|
March 14, 2011
During the election president Obama campaigned for energy conservation – a.k.a. political speak for running up the price of oil products to cut consumption.

Most of the politicians in office support "conservation" – political speak for running up the price of oil and electricity.

As far as I can tell more than half of them want to save the earth by cutting CO2 production from American plants and consumers – a.k.a. running up the price of petroleum products to cut consumption.

OPEC supports a higher price for crude to make up for reduced consumption and the effects of inflation.

Elections have consequences! Just like political and economic philosophies have consequences.

-------------

I have been watching the events in Japan. They do not seem to have any windmills over there. I doubt if they have any geothermal power plants even though they sit on massive deposits of geothermal heat.

It would be interesting to know who conned the Japanese politicians into nuclear power plants.

Of the 5 who experienced cooling it failures from the earthquake and flood – 3 have blown up leaving only 2 more explosions to go. On top of that - one reactor, which was shut down and undergoing maintenance is now on fire.

Yes, my friends, step right up! Nuclear power is safe and will save the planet from those naughty CO2's.

A friend of mine reminded me with enough radioactivity in your body you glow-in-the-dark. And you do not need electricity to light your house.

Akteabags
|
March 14, 2011
"No taxpayer funds needed..."

"$27500.00 in taxpayer money went into his house. I hope you feel your money was well spent, I do not."

good grief.....

a couple of questions for those who have tight underwear about the tax credits....

do you or did you ever have a mortgage? do you deduct your mortgage interest from your income taxes? (assuming your pay income taxes unlike too many nutjob anti-american/anti-government CONs-ervatives...) do you have children? did you take tax credits or declare them as dependents for 18 years?

people without kids or renters might object to having to pay higher taxes to subsidizes YOUR kids and your home purchase. eh?

if you want to argue that there should be NO deductions or credits of ANY KIND for ANYONE i'm with you. but until you look in the mirror, your hypocracy is, well, its very public-can.....

CONs-ervatives.....un-encumbered by the thought process.....
Invictus
|
March 14, 2011
I like all the happy talk and strongly endorse the technology and trickle-down economy that Kassel and Chlupp are employing to gain energy efficiency. I also commend some of the comments below, including childofsol's and Kamen's; however, we are still going to need to dig many gigantic holes in the ground and pump & burn a lot of oil to build millions of these alternative energy units. We have to come to grips with reality. In other words and as childofsol directs --- "All of the above."
sonofchulio
|
March 14, 2011
These two houses are wonderful examples of what can be done.

At the risk of being labeled a naysayer or a negative nabob or a cretin or whatever epithet that the true believers want to toss, I do have a couple of reservations about practicality.

The fact that we all can't live on south facing, high elevation property has been brought up. I would have to assume that if solar or wind generated energy were ever to have any practical use for the masses, then besides building efficient homes we would also need to use the prime locations for energy generators. Is that something that we want to do, cover all of our ridges and domed mountaintops with energy collectors. I'm just asking the question, not answering it. And that other old bugaboo question, "At what economic cost?"

These two articles have been great. It is awesome to see ingenuity, and living within and very well with our sub-arctic environment. It's impressive. As we seek to utilize the developing technology for the future, we still need to heat our homes in the here and now, and transport the materials of life, and get to work every day. The answer is still "All of the above".

Thank you Mr. Chlupp and Mr. Kassell for sharing your awe inspiring designs and homes. There is so much to appreciate.
LostAlaskan99712
|
March 14, 2011
"I heat my home for about $200 a month using heating fuel and that is hard to beat."

I don't see how that's any better than...

"It was 2 below zero outside and 70 degrees inside when he woke up Wednesday. He hadn’t heated the home for three days."

“If it stays sunny for the next several days, we’ll probably not have to light the fire again until October,”

nfbx
|
March 14, 2011
Aside from the property costs/availability on sunny south facing slopes that others have mentioned, there is a serious problem with storing thermal energy in contact with warm permafrost. There is plenty of THAT in and around the Fairbanks area. Even if the thermal mass is insulated well enough from the permafrost that it stays frozen (nearly impossible in warm permafrost) that's a LOT of weight to be placing on ice rich soils that like to creep under load. Up on Murphy dome where you've got bedrock, great, more power to you, but suggesting that anyone can consider this is a bit reckless.
JoeParks
|
March 14, 2011
I did'nt realize how much energy was available in Fairbanks, its just crazy,,,
winterone52
|
March 14, 2011
Agree with rationalcitizen. I'd rather be giving my tax dollars to the Kassel brothers than the Koch brothers. And will give full support to anyone who has a vision for the future that extends past lunchtime tomorrow.
rationalcitizen
|
March 14, 2011
"We'll still need these fossil fuels to dig those gigantic holes."

Of course, because in our complacency we haven't bothered to try and invent replacements. And if you want rare earth metals...try looking in the other big holes we've been dumping them into for the last 100 years. There was an article I posted here not to long ago that if Japan mined its high-tech landfills it would quickly rise to 3-4 highest producer on the planet of precious and rare earth metals.

TheLighterSide
|
March 14, 2011
Thanks for the input Karl. I appreciate what you are doing and I'm glad you opened up your house (and your life) to help others know about alternatives to the conventional heating/design approaches. We have to set the bar higher in terms of energy efficiency in housing, and every bit of new info helps. Don't pay any mind to the negative types here. They will find some way to ooze bile over a story no matter the subject.
LostAlaskan99712
|
March 14, 2011
LOL @ all the JEALOUS nay-sayers.

I suppose y'all would be praising this guy if he had built his house out of old growth trees and installed a 1920's coal furnace. Wierdos.
Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.