Jim Dodson, president of FEDC, said the project would lower energy costs as much as alternatives and do it five years sooner.
Dodson asked the 11-member delegation to help secure state-backed financing for the project. That factor could shave borrowing costs considerably.
Dodson said the value of a five-year advantage makes the project more valuable than other options on policy makers’ table.
Fairbanks Natural Gas Co. President Dan Britton and Alaska Gasline Port Authority Chairman Jim Whitaker have led work on the trucking project. They hope the authority can issue roughly $250 million in bonds this year to finance the purchase of the gas company.
Dodson said his analysis suggests the trucking plan is the “bridge” project Fairbanks needs before a larger project, such as a proposed natural gas pipeline, comes along.
“The biggest risk we have is to do nothing,” he told the delegation Thursday. He said he worked with former Alaska Energy Authority Executive Director Steve Haagenson and with university researchers to produce and review the analysis.
Rep. Bob Miller, D-Fairbanks, said the corporation’s numbers may justify state involvement.
“God knows we need a quick fix,” he said, referring to chronically high energy costs.
The corporation’s analysis compared the proposed trucking project to a pipeline plan being pitched by the Fairbanks Pipeline Co. That firm, affiliated with Energia Cura, has proposed selling stock to finance a pipeline project between the North Slope and the Fairbanks area.
Whitaker estimated last month the publicly controlled port authority could borrow at a 7 percent interest rate for the project. But Dodson said Thursday that the Alaska Energy Authority could finance the project through a special power fund and shave that borrowing rate significantly. That, he said, would lower retail prices for natural gas.
The Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority reviewed the trucking project two years ago and cited potential hurdles. AIDEA is a sister agency to the state energy authority, with identical board members and shared staff. A spokesman for the agencies said last month that AIDEA had not been formally approached for financial help with the proposal.
FEDC estimates the greater Fairbanks area collectively pays $618 million per year in energy costs, mostly for space heating. Dodson said that’s an unsustainable collective cost that will inhibit economic development until addressed.
John Davies, a former state lawmaker, attended Thursday’s meeting and agreed with Dodson’s conclusions. He said a two-year-old analysis of Fairbanks Natural Gas’ infrastructure suggests the community’s natural gas distribution system could expand simply and inexpensively. He said separate distribution systems could be developed for Fairbanks and North Pole.
Dodson said the expansion proposed by AGPA and Fairbanks Natural Gas also would address persistent air pollution by switching more households from wood heat to natural gas.
Fairbanks North Star Borough Mayor Luke Hopkins, also a board director for the port authority, said he concurred with the corporation’s conclusion. He said the Fairbanks community needs to agree on a project that lowers the cost of energy and increases the volume of gas.
Dodson said Fairbanks Natural Gas has negotiated a long-term supply contract with Exxon Mobil.
“That’s worth something,” he said, citing the deal as one of a handful of reasons the proposal has a leg up on alternatives.
Contact staff writer Christopher Eshleman at 459-7582.


from what I understand it will take approx 17 semi type trucks per day just to supply the GVEA generator in North Pole.500 miles one way to gas fields and you can see how many trucks it will require.Add on more customers,add on more trucks.
As for FNG purchase price,at $50 million it comes out at approx $50,000 for each gas meter,about 1,000 customers.The national average is about $3,400.Something is wrong with this deal.
Check out www.fairbankspipelinecompany.com
I don't see how trucking can possibly be better than pipeing it.Hope the right people look over this plan.Going down the wrong path will be costly.I'm not sure fairbanks can adfford it.
And it's not just about the $400,000 of public taxes to support the 'business lions' of FedCo, or the $$$$s down the drain over the years to the Port Authority, the liability they want our legislators to burden eveyone in the State with, or even the $$$s that GVEA and natural gas customers will be in hock for for years to come, though goodness knows, that's more than enough to ride these folks out of town on a rail. It's also about what goes on for 'entertainment' during unitemized $20,000 'fishing trips' and/or 'hunting camps', where prospective investors and/or Fed dispensers of grants are woed. This community could REALLY do without this whole crowd.
FEDC received a $400,000 grant from the Fairbanks North Star Borough: $100K from the general fund and $300K from the non-area wide fund. (See page 347 of the FNSB FY 2010-2011 Approved Budget)
Mayor Hopkins defended FEDC's funding when assembly members Sattley and Howard moved to reduce the amount by $200K at the May 6th budget setting meeting. The audio recording of that meeting can be found at:
http://co.fairbanks.ak.us/Meetings/Assembly/ArchiveMeetingPages/meetings2010.htm .
Mayor Hopkins is a member of the Board of Directors of the Port Authority.
Our newspaper editors are asleep.
Fleet liquidation sale..
2 dozen LPG-propane single axle trucks
$12,000 each
..too many chiefs, and not enough indians
LNG (methane) is non-toxic and will just evaporate if released from a truck rollover. spilled diesel fuel would be the only impact, unless the trucks were also fueld be LNG or methane.
Dave Cobb
Bert Cottle
Dave Dengel
If so please help me understand how this benefits Valdez and gets a gasline to tidewater.
There certainly seems to be less and less benefit and discussion on Valdez's behalf as an origional sponsor. Can we just opt out like the North Slope Borough? AGPA, is this what we voted for in 1999?
I like numbers. I use them a lot. I base investments on numbers. Apparently I'm suppose to like this project without any numbers to review.
Burnie Madoff would be proud of the fleecing this idea promise to give investors.
Cheaper energy costs, burn coal, at least get busy building hydro power, one that has a proven track record of lowering energy costs. The trucking business may make some profit but only at the cost of the gas consumer. Gas prices will come VERY close to or equal oil prices or the big oil will not sell it.. end of project. WAKE UP
If Fairbanks Natural Gas wants to stay in the game let them send their trucks north instead of south for awhile until the bullet line is complete. There will be a good used compressor station for sale down south soon. If not, let them fail, pickup the pieces at junk price and use them as a bridge. Any further waste of time in building a line serving only Alaska doubles as a waste of precious time and money. Quit giving the oil companies tax breaks that provide no benefits to the state and invest the money in Alaska's future.