FEDC to lawmakers: Help with trucking project
by Christopher Eshleman / ceshleman@newsminer.com
Feb 10, 2011 | 3182 views | 24 24 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
JUNEAU — The Fairbanks Economic Development Corp. asked the Legislature’s Interior delegation on Thursday to back a joint venture aimed at trucking North Slope natural gas to Fairbanks.

Jim Dodson, president of FEDC, said the project would lower energy costs as much as alternatives and do it five years sooner.

Dodson asked the 11-member delegation to help secure state-backed financing for the project. That factor could shave borrowing costs considerably.

Dodson said the value of a five-year advantage makes the project more valuable than other options on policy makers’ table.

Fairbanks Natural Gas Co. President Dan Britton and Alaska Gasline Port Authority Chairman Jim Whitaker have led work on the trucking project. They hope the authority can issue roughly $250 million in bonds this year to finance the purchase of the gas company.

Dodson said his analysis suggests the trucking plan is the “bridge” project Fairbanks needs before a larger project, such as a proposed natural gas pipeline, comes along.

“The biggest risk we have is to do nothing,” he told the delegation Thursday. He said he worked with former Alaska Energy Authority Executive Director Steve Haagenson and with university researchers to produce and review the analysis.

Rep. Bob Miller, D-Fairbanks, said the corporation’s numbers may justify state involvement.

“God knows we need a quick fix,” he said, referring to chronically high energy costs.

The corporation’s analysis compared the proposed trucking project to a pipeline plan being pitched by the Fairbanks Pipeline Co. That firm, affiliated with Energia Cura, has proposed selling stock to finance a pipeline project between the North Slope and the Fairbanks area.

Whitaker estimated last month the publicly controlled port authority could borrow at a 7 percent interest rate for the project. But Dodson said Thursday that the Alaska Energy Authority could finance the project through a special power fund and shave that borrowing rate significantly. That, he said, would lower retail prices for natural gas.

The Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority reviewed the trucking project two years ago and cited potential hurdles. AIDEA is a sister agency to the state energy authority, with identical board members and shared staff. A spokesman for the agencies said last month that AIDEA had not been formally approached for financial help with the proposal.

FEDC estimates the greater Fairbanks area collectively pays $618 million per year in energy costs, mostly for space heating. Dodson said that’s an unsustainable collective cost that will inhibit economic development until addressed.

John Davies, a former state lawmaker, attended Thursday’s meeting and agreed with Dodson’s conclusions. He said a two-year-old analysis of Fairbanks Natural Gas’ infrastructure suggests the community’s natural gas distribution system could expand simply and inexpensively. He said separate distribution systems could be developed for Fairbanks and North Pole.

Dodson said the expansion proposed by AGPA and Fairbanks Natural Gas also would address persistent air pollution by switching more households from wood heat to natural gas.

Fairbanks North Star Borough Mayor Luke Hopkins, also a board director for the port authority, said he concurred with the corporation’s conclusion. He said the Fairbanks community needs to agree on a project that lowers the cost of energy and increases the volume of gas.

Dodson said Fairbanks Natural Gas has negotiated a long-term supply contract with Exxon Mobil.

“That’s worth something,” he said, citing the deal as one of a handful of reasons the proposal has a leg up on alternatives.

Contact staff writer Christopher Eshleman at 459-7582.
Comments
(24)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
doubledumb
|
February 12, 2011
Quick fix. Dump all these Carpetbaggers, from FEDCO to the Xmayor. Is Jim gonna have Crash Proof/Non Exploding trucks to haul this gas? They been milking this cash cow for over 20 years now. NO to any type BOND. Bye now.
fairhearing
|
February 11, 2011
Rawhyde

from what I understand it will take approx 17 semi type trucks per day just to supply the GVEA generator in North Pole.500 miles one way to gas fields and you can see how many trucks it will require.Add on more customers,add on more trucks.

As for FNG purchase price,at $50 million it comes out at approx $50,000 for each gas meter,about 1,000 customers.The national average is about $3,400.Something is wrong with this deal.

Check out www.fairbankspipelinecompany.com

I don't see how trucking can possibly be better than pipeing it.Hope the right people look over this plan.Going down the wrong path will be costly.I'm not sure fairbanks can adfford it.
Pearl=W
|
February 11, 2011
If you look at the overlap of personnel among: the FbkNS Borough, FedCo, the Port Authority, and the GVEA Board, you can do a good triangulation of where/who the public moneys spent on this absurd fantasy will benefit. And it's pretty much the same little social club that's been sucking off the public for ages already. As the price of gasoline/diesel rises, and junk-bond funding costs raise more and more sceptism, these boondogglers are becoming desparate, fearful their dream-scheme to suck up public $$$s is going to dry up before they can cash in on "the big one". So if it's only rated as 'junk-bond' material, get the State to back it with our public funds. Oh yeah, a great idea!

And it's not just about the $400,000 of public taxes to support the 'business lions' of FedCo, or the $$$$s down the drain over the years to the Port Authority, the liability they want our legislators to burden eveyone in the State with, or even the $$$s that GVEA and natural gas customers will be in hock for for years to come, though goodness knows, that's more than enough to ride these folks out of town on a rail. It's also about what goes on for 'entertainment' during unitemized $20,000 'fishing trips' and/or 'hunting camps', where prospective investors and/or Fed dispensers of grants are woed. This community could REALLY do without this whole crowd.
Justliberty
|
February 11, 2011
The FEDC's analysis of the Porty Authority's project should be taken with a 'grain of salt'.

FEDC received a $400,000 grant from the Fairbanks North Star Borough: $100K from the general fund and $300K from the non-area wide fund. (See page 347 of the FNSB FY 2010-2011 Approved Budget)

Mayor Hopkins defended FEDC's funding when assembly members Sattley and Howard moved to reduce the amount by $200K at the May 6th budget setting meeting. The audio recording of that meeting can be found at:

http://co.fairbanks.ak.us/Meetings/Assembly/ArchiveMeetingPages/meetings2010.htm .

Mayor Hopkins is a member of the Board of Directors of the Port Authority.

Our newspaper editors are asleep.
DistantThunder
|
February 11, 2011
http://www.truckpaper.com/list/list.aspx?ETID=1&catid=237&bcatid=27

Fleet liquidation sale..

2 dozen LPG-propane single axle trucks

$12,000 each

..too many chiefs, and not enough indians
USG
|
February 11, 2011
This is a very sleazy deal. Totally unnecessary to buy out FNG and send precious Interiour capital budget to FNG's outside owners. There's a reason AGPA failed to raise the money in the capital markets!!!
answerss
|
February 11, 2011
We live in one of the largest communities in the country not serviced by natural gas. Somebody has finally figured out a cost effective plan to get gas to Fairbanks after almost 40 years, and most of what I read from you all is negative. No one else has stepped up to the plate, and no one else will in the near future. You all should be doing what you can to help the project, not just make ignorant comments about it. We can all agree that oil isn't going to get cheaper as its supplies dwindle from the slope.
answerss
|
February 11, 2011
civilopinion:

LNG (methane) is non-toxic and will just evaporate if released from a truck rollover. spilled diesel fuel would be the only impact, unless the trucks were also fueld be LNG or methane.
neighbor72
|
February 11, 2011
I would be interested in reading comments from a haul road trucker or two on what their thoughts are on this idea.
Rawhyde
|
February 11, 2011
How many truck loads a day would be needed,and how big a storage facility would be needed so as not to be an on demand delivery system..you know incase the road was closed..
Pipe2Valdez
|
February 11, 2011
So do Valdez AGPA members really support this?

Dave Cobb

Bert Cottle

Dave Dengel

If so please help me understand how this benefits Valdez and gets a gasline to tidewater.

There certainly seems to be less and less benefit and discussion on Valdez's behalf as an origional sponsor. Can we just opt out like the North Slope Borough? AGPA, is this what we voted for in 1999?
islandliver
|
February 11, 2011
Here we go again: the magic trucking company that will haul gas to Fairbanks and save big bucks for the areas residents. Of course if the project fails who will loose: not the proposer who will get paid as the project attempts to prove its viability or fails in the process.

I like numbers. I use them a lot. I base investments on numbers. Apparently I'm suppose to like this project without any numbers to review.

Burnie Madoff would be proud of the fleecing this idea promise to give investors.

Larmex
|
February 11, 2011
Just how stupid can these people get? Or is it us to allow these fools keep blowing smoke up our butts. Give the facts to a third grade class of kids and they will come up with the above results, this project STINKS. If nothing else look at the suscess of those involved, what have they acheved in their lives? Past performance will answer that question. NOTHING.

Cheaper energy costs, burn coal, at least get busy building hydro power, one that has a proven track record of lowering energy costs. The trucking business may make some profit but only at the cost of the gas consumer. Gas prices will come VERY close to or equal oil prices or the big oil will not sell it.. end of project. WAKE UP
Fairbanksgas
|
February 11, 2011
That settles it beyond a reasonable doubt. If FEDCO is now pushing it is definitely a bad idea.
farmnews
|
February 11, 2011
A quarter billion here, a half billion to Trans Canada, sounds like a good down payment on a bullet line that actually makes sense for the entire state. How much longer will our governor waste away our money on a pipe dream that has little chance of success for at least another thirty years? Holding up the fact that Trans Canada has no bids for space on their mythical pipeline may have gotten him elected, but it will do little else in helping Alaska achieve anything but continued waste.

If Fairbanks Natural Gas wants to stay in the game let them send their trucks north instead of south for awhile until the bullet line is complete. There will be a good used compressor station for sale down south soon. If not, let them fail, pickup the pieces at junk price and use them as a bridge. Any further waste of time in building a line serving only Alaska doubles as a waste of precious time and money. Quit giving the oil companies tax breaks that provide no benefits to the state and invest the money in Alaska's future.

Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.