The Washington, D.C.-based conservation group’s executive director said the purpose of the Fairbanks office is to work specifically securing wilderness designations in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPR-A) on the North Slope and on other BLM lands in the eastern Interior.
“A lot of the public lands we’re concerned about are near Fairbanks,” said Cindy Shogan, the league’s executive director. “Having a Fairbanks office gives us a great opportunity to be up close and personal with those issues.”
The Alaska Wilderness League was formed in 1993 to protect Alaska’s public lands from development and the League already had offices in Anchorage and Juneau.
“Basically we want to have a Fairbanks office to work on NPR-A and the Eastern Interior Resource Management Plan to get the strongest protection possible for those lands,” Shogan said
The League’s Fairbanks office is located at 1222 Well Street, Suite 12. There will be an open house from 5-7 p.m. today to announce its opening, though it’s actually been open since September.
Darcie Warden, 37, will serve as outreach coordinator in the one-person Fairbanks office. Warden has worked with Alaska Native tribes, nonprofit groups and the state and federal governments since she moved to Alaska from California in 2001.
Warden spent three years living in the Yukon River village of Galena, 300 miles west of Fairbanks, doing environmental work for the Louden Tribal Council. She also worked two years as an environmental technician for the Yukon River Inter-Tribal Watershed Council. Warden earned a degree in earth systems science and policy from California State University, Monterey Bay.
Warden said she monitor management plans on BLM lands, attend meetings and work with residents who live in those areas and will be impacted by potential development, such as oil and gas drilling or mining, to encourage local participation in the planning process.
“We really listen to what local communities want,” Warden said. “That’s why we’re here in Alaska.”
Her two main focuses will be on the NPR-A, a 23-million acre area on the North Slope that lies west of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and has been billed as the largest tract of undisturbed public land in the U.S., and the Eastern Interior Resource Management Plan, which will provide future direction for 6.7 million acres of public land, including the White Mountains National Recreation Area, the Steese National Conservation Area and the Fortymile region.
The League already works closely with the Northern Alaska Environmental Center and adding an office in Fairbanks should enhance that relationship, said NAEC executive director Karen Kelly.
There are a lot of complex environmental issues unraveling in Alaska and having someone on the ground to provide a local perspective on national issues is important, she said.
BLM district manager Bob Schneider in Fairbanks said the agency welcomes input from the Alaska Wilderness League, just as it does from all public organizations.
The Alaska Wilderness League contends that public lands are being threatened by “poor management and reckless decisions” by the BLM.
“The Bureau of Land Management has become better known for putting public lands into private hands, for promoting private industry and development interests over the interests of the public and the health of the land,” the League’s website reads.
Contact staff writer Tim Mowry at 459-7587.


Welcome back my brother (or sister). Rather than seek out our differences, let’s see where we can find some common ground. If nothing else it’s just plain neighborly!
Let’s see…I heat my house with a combination of natural resources, fire wood and heating oil. The house is mainly constructed of lumber made from trees. How about you?
I drive a car. It is primarily made from metals extracted from the earth. It also has plastics made from petroleum products. Some nice cows died, so I have leather seats. Oh, and it burns gasoline, also extracted from the earth. How about you?
I eat food that is brought in from far off places. These were extracted and transported using tractors, trains, ships and planes, and I brought them home in my car (all use extracted resources). How about you?
My clothes are almost all manufactured out of state. Some animals were sheered, some were killed for some of my cloths, and the fleece and poly pro that I so love were made from petroleum products. How about you?
I use toilet paper (life is better with toilet paper). Again, harvested from natural resources. How about you? Or do you subscribe to the “left hand is for wiping, right hand is for eating” concept?
I read books constantly. Guess where the paper comes from? I’ll offer you a hint; it’s not the paper fairy. Do you read books?
Your concern for me is touching. As we find common ground I really think that we could be friends!
You are suffering from a judgment error. Allow me to point it out for you.
If you think you truly know anyone in this forum, think again. Wonderful that you can describe yourself and all your justifications for what you call "our" common lifestyle. I doubt your lifestyle is anything like mine. Great, you can speak for yourself, but don't speak for me, much less put a label on me. I feel sorry for you.
You are suffering from a thinking error. Allow me to point it out to you.
I advocate reasonable extraction of natural resources. This means that I am willing to use a limited amount of “untouched wilderness” to support our common lifestyle. I acknowledge that this requires mining, drilling, logging and fishing. In return from this use of the environment I can wear comfortable clothes, keep my house warm, drive to work, fly, eat a varied diet. My children have access to education and excellent health care. I am even able wipe my hind end with toilet paper! This is the “house” I live in. It is not constructed of glass.
Now allow me to describe the house that the EcoCultists live in; they to benefit from resource extraction just as I do, but they feel a sense of guilt. Every square of toilet paper represents a tree stripped from Mother Earth. Every hamburger represents an assault on our “fragile ecosystem”. Just think of the methane! In an act of contrition, they foolishly believe that they can atone for their sins by “preserving untouched wilderness”. The EcoCultists house isn’t constructed of glass either. It happens to be made of hot air and misplaced guilt.
Consumed -- you're the one who brought up length of residency. What does that have to do with tiny boxes?
@Polarmark>One word: Naive.
@Alaskaborn>You obviously are using a computer to type in your assumptions...so, to you....."Glass houses".
I would think someone who doesn't fit in tiny boxes would see that.
As a fellow suckler, rather than drill here, you advocate drilling in someone else's backyard? I don't want to put words in your mouth.
That would be unreasonable...
Invictus, that has nothing to do with this thread. please save your judgements for another time. i should warn you tho... i dont fit so well in tiny little boxes.
~Consumed
How do you heat your house? Do you drive a car? Fly? Use electricity? Toilet paper? Own any silver or gold?
Frankly, I find it to be very selfish.
vs. a few hundred square miles of development.
Reason, versus emotion or psuedo-religion, tells us that development of our resources is logical..dare I say...Reasonable?
I really don't think this is what the Alaska Wilderness League intends to do. My point is that as Alaskans living in one of the most pristine untouched places on Earth, why would one choose to develop this land or drill for oil, so that Alaska can be just like every other place people try to escape from? Where will we go then? When there are no untouched places left? Or is simply ok, because you may die before you see that day? Its not ok with me.
It is unreasonable to lock up huge swaths of this state to appease EcoCultists.
See, I can be reasonable!