Comments by FrozenAK
Page 1 of 6 | Next
Posted on August 28 at 3:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Niceguy-
The reason for the rules is simple. Education is priority one, not athletics. What kind of message is sent when a player is allowed to transfer schools because of a lack of playing time. I must state that I do not know the circumstances in this case, and am only speaking hypothetically.
Posted on August 28 at 7:13 a.m. (Suggest removal)
My problem with this is that the family appears to be putting athletics before education.
If this student was in a "gang" and the parents felt it necessary to transfer him, why would athletic eligibility have anything to do with it? Be thankfull he is hopefully straightening himself out, and proceeding on with school.
Posted on August 27 at 10:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I had the same initial reaction NP_rules. But......I understand that ASAA needs to keep a close eye on transfers. It wasn't that long ago when students were simply transfering from school to school depending on what athletic season it is.
We have to remember that education is priority one, and athletics and other activities are a very distant number two.
On Judge hears case on status of Monroe Catholic High School quarterback
Posted on August 26 at 2:43 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I am very familiar with the Arctic Lions.
Just weren't sure exactly what you meant my "pitching" in.
The work they do during the games brings in revenue into their travel program.
Three different youth hockey organizations participate during the Ice Dog games I believe. The Arctic Lions, the Ice Breakers(girls teams), and FAHA. I believe FAHA and the Icebreakers mainly work the concession stand.
Posted on August 26 at 1:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I guess i'm a bit confused as to the above statement. The Arctic Lions are "pitching" to the ice dogs on home ice?
Please explain.
Posted on August 13 at 9:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Fairbanks Gas-
You are honestly involved with the Attorney Generals office on this subject? Do you mind if I ask as to what information you can offer them that they can't find themselves?
And I agree with Pavel on one part of this. People need to at least research simple economics, and realize that this is a global industry, not "Big" Oil as so many like to call it. Then come back and complain...and I will be the first to listen.
On Enlighten us
Posted on August 12 at 12:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Just_Me
I guess i'm absolutely confused as to what your post is about. It's pretty simple, these companies are doing survey work along and around these hunting areas. It's a safety issue, not a political one.
What "maps" are you referring to? Have you researched the proposed route that ConocoPhillips and BP are proposing? And you do realize that not "map" is set in stone until this survey, and the enviromental imact studies done afterwords are complete?
Posted on August 12 at 8:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I do believe the training is done from within each company, (Conoco/BP). I've never heard the term "guide" used before though.
Posted on August 6 at 3:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Keep the 1200, and help with lowering energy costs.
Perhaps a hybrid of subsidy for energy, and a investment in "alternate" energy plans.
I understand that the $1200 payout is the simplest and easiest solution right now. And maybe be ok for this year due to time restraints, but we need to look further down the road also.
For myself the 1200 does absolutely nothing.
On Stonewalling
Page 1 of 6 | Next
Posted on November 13 at 2:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Cory Koop was able to attend 4 of the 5 first practices during hockey tryouts.
On Patriots seeking sweep in the pool