Rural Alaska communities seek ways to lower energy costs
Published Friday, July 4, 2008
A group of Dillingham, Alaska, fishermen hoping to reduce gas costs for the Bristol Bay fleet are sketching plans to turn salmon waste into fuel.
In Nunam Iqua in Western Alaska, a tiny utility hopes to spin power from the wind electric use will jump when a new school opens and flush toilets arrive.
And in Fort Yukon in the Interior, Native groups hope to heat buildings with wood collected from fire-charred swaths of forest.
Throughout isolated, rural Alaska, where fuel prices often top $6 per gallon and produce enormous electric and heating bills, residents are racing to find cheaper energy using natural resources in their backyard.
The Denali Commission and Alaska Energy Authority are helping fuel the alternative energy stampede with state and federal funds. In June, the groups awarded $5 million to 33 projects around Alaska.
People in Nunam Iqua have to do something, said Carin Finch, a grant adviser at the city.
"We're in shock," she said.
The summer fuel barge hasn't arrived, but gas and heating fuel prices in the village of 200 will likely barrel past $7 per gallon when it does. Electric bills will rise 40 percent."There's grave concern," she said. "We're hoping the state can help electric utilities."
Residents in the Yup'ik village started looking into building wind turbines in 2005 when officials realized plans for a new school would double the community's electric use, said Finch. The school opens this fall. The load will increase when houses finally get running water and toilets that flush, requiring electrically operated pumps, probably next year.
Tests show that there's enough wind in the village, Finch said. But more studies are needed.
The city received $34,000 from the Denali Commission to determine if wind turbines are a good investment and if the tundra can support them.
If they can't be built, residents will consider hydropower or some other form of alternative energy, she said.
"It's the future," Finch said.
Native groups in Fort Yukon hope to beat the "ungodly" fuel prices in that village, where diesel is $6.49 per gallon, by harvesting wood downed by forest fires, said David Thomas, power plant operator in the village of 600.
About $800,000 from the Denali Commission will help buy equipment such as a brush cutter and backhoe.
"We'll get a lumber company going, harvest wood, bring it back and then buy some big boilers to heat the buildings," Thomas said.
The groups the Council of Athabascan Tribal Governments and the Gwitchyaa Zhee Corp. hope to employ a few residents who gather wood in winter and barge it down the river in summer. "The money will stay in town, ya know," Thomas said. "Hopefully it will knock down some of these diesel prices."
In Dillingham, Steve Noonkesser has helped organize a group of fishermen and others who are studying ways to reduce the cost of energy. They hope to get cheaper gas for driftnet fishermen.
"They fish all over the bay and they're really getting hit," said Noonkesser, who fishes commercially from a shore-set net.
The group, which includes retired fishermen and people with electrical and welding skills, are looking into making a machine that can render oil from fish waste.
If it can be done economically, they'll turn fish oil into biodiesel that can fuel boats.
That would be much cheaper than gasoline, said Noonkesser.
It would improve the bottom line for fishing operations and allow some people to stay in the region instead of moving to Anchorage for cheaper living, said Noonkesser. That's happened a lot in recent years, he said.
"This is a good place to live and finding ways to continue to live here is pretty important to me," he said.
The group might apply for an $180,000 Alaska Energy Authority grant to help pay for the oil-rendering machine.
The authority announced the grant on June 20. It will be awarded by December, said James Jensen, an AEA assistant project manager.
The machine should be portable so it can travel between communities, rendering oil at different processing plants, he said.
The effort hopes to build on the success of UniSea Inc.'s Dutch Harbor operation, Jensen said. The seafood company's processing plant there has saved loads of money by mixing fish oil with expensive diesel fuel to generate electricity.
Other big processing plants in Alaska use fish oil to heat buildings and make fish meal.
But smaller processing plants collectively throw away millions of gallons of fish waste a year without extracting the oil. Those smaller plants can't afford the rendering equipment and a portable machine could help them, said John Steigers, a consultant for the project.
The fish oil could be used by the processing plant or community in raw form to heat buildings. It could be mixed with diesel fuel to power electric turbines, as UniSea does. Or it could be converted to biodiesel fuel, as Noonkesser proposes.
Creating biodiesel from fish waste is just one of the group's ideas to bring down fuel prices in Dillingham, Noonkesser said.
"Anything that would reduce energy costs would be good," he said.
Digg
del.icio.us
Mixx
Reddit
Stumble It!
Community Discussion
Newsminer.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full user's agreement.
Here's a multifuel engine with an amazingly simple design..
http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Directo....
It can burn propane, nat-gas, bio-diesel, and LRCWF liquid-coal.
Sometimes it's easier to replace the engine than to reconfigure the fuel.
One idea that nobody seem seems to consider is that Alaska can sell its own royalty oil based refined products to Alaskans at below market prices. Since the prices are not based on production costs, this would means accepting less profit. In a market where the profit is the majority cost, and where Alaska is not hurting in terms of budget, this would appear to be a very attractive way of showing priority to Alaska consumers. The royalty oil should show some special benefit to Alaskans, anyway. Since we are all the owners of the resources of the state, why not allow the owners to partake of the benefits at a price better than the market at large? And when in comes to future development, when have we ever decided not to develop resources based on the time to market? Only when the developer doesn't have the funds to complete the project. Well, Alaska does indeed have the funds to complete the project of developing ANWR. Only when we decide to allow outside corporations to make the decisions does it look like it may not happen. So Alaska needs to take control of the process, form a consortium that will work for us, and provide the incentives to make it happen.
With oil at 14* a barrel, which is a lot more than the 18 per barrel we based our budgets on just a few years ago, it should be a whole new environment.
If not now, when?
este: Right on point. Why are we charging ourselves at Texas prices plus freight for oil based products that we own? Unless something is done, that is just more than politicans talking, Alaska's economy from anything but oil will come to a halt ASAP.
Come on Governor and Legislators get your thinking caps on AND GET SOMETHING DONE.
Such wishfull thinking, you guys. And if it rained milk cows, we'd all
be dairy farmers!!
The bush has got it right. Use anything but petroleum products for heat and power. Putting locals to work cutting wood is win win. We use a local product and employ people locally in the bush where jobs are mostly make believe government jobs to harvest wood. Every dollar spent this way is one less dollar going to our enimies overseas. If every village that has available timber did this it would employ hundreds of people or more and save millions.
Post a comment
Commenting requires registration.