by Chris Freiberg / cfreiberg@newsminer.com
3 months ago | 24043 views | 262

|
100 
|
|
FAIRBANKS — An 81-year-old man was Tasered during a traffic stop last week.
It is the second time since 1998 that police have had to make a show of force during a traffic stop to arrest Glen M. Wilcox, a Fairbanks-based Episcopalian priest and real estate agent.
Court documents allege that officers with Eielson Air Force Base’s 354th Security Forces Squadron pulled Wilcox over just after 1 p.m. Wednesday for going 11 miles over the speed limit on the Richardson Highway.
An officer, identified as a senior airman in court documents, took Wilcox’s license, registration and proof of insurance and wrote him a traffic citation. When he returned to Wilcox’s car, Wilcox refused to accept the documents and sped down the highway, according to a criminal complaint filed in court.
Wilcox disputes that version of events.
“They waved to me and I thought that meant I could go on,” Wilcox said. “They stopped me again and told me to get out of my car.”
Alaska State Troopers were notified of the incident, and the 354th “initiated a high-risk traffic stop” near 336 Mile Richardson Highway. When Wilcox, a former commander of the Civil Air Patrol, again stopped, he initially refused to roll down his window.
He eventually got out of his vehicle and was told to put his hands behind his back, something he claims is physically impossible for him.
“I showed them I could barely touch my fingertips and they insisted,” he said.
Charging documents allege Wilcox used profanity with the airmen. When they tried to handcuff him, Wilcox, described in court documents as being 6 feet 1 inch tall and 250 pounds, allegedly tried to jerk away from the airmen and used his body to push them around, a claim he also disputes.
After several warnings, one of the airmen used a Taser on Wilcox to take him into custody.
“It hurts like hell,” Wilcox said. “I’m laying on the ground when they Tasered me. It’s painful and very sharp.”
Wilcox said the incident left his arms bruised and he had to seek treatment at a doctor. He also obtained a lawyer but would not elaborate on how he intends to pursue the case.
“If I were their base commander, I would put them in jail,” he said. “Four young men in their 20s do not need to Taser and handcuff an 81-year-old.”
The next day, prosecutors dropped a charge of fourth-degree misdemeanor assault against Wilcox. He pleaded not guilty to counts of resisting arrest — a misdemeanor — and failure to stop at the direction of a peace officer, a felony. He later posted $250 bail.
Air Force regulations authorize law enforcement officials to use Tasers to arrest subjects who are actively resisting arrest or noncompliant with law enforcement orders, said Staff Sgt. James Stewart, a spokesman for Eielson. Regulations do not give different directives on how to deal with older subjects.
The airmen used a minimum amount of nonlethal force to resolve the situation, Stewart said.
In May 1998, Wilcox was accused of a similar incident when Fairbanks International Airport police pulled him over for driving with expired tags. Wilcox reportedly became belligerent with police and grabbed and twisted a female officer’s arm. In that case, he had to be pepper-sprayed to be taken into custody.
Wilcox said the truck he was driving at the time had an issue that it would not start again within five minutes of starting it up. He pulled the officer’s arm away to keep her from grabbing the key out of the ignition, he said.
He later pleaded guilty to a reduced count of disorderly conduct and a misdemeanor count of failure to stop at the direction of a peace officer. He successfully completed probation and more than 100 hours of community service.
Several people who said they knew Wilcox for decades wrote letters to the judge before sentencing, saying the incident was extremely out of character for him.
Contact staff writer Chris Freiberg at 459-7545.
I would suggest you use an anonymous userid with a name like you were blessed with.
Also it would behoove you to either go by your middle name or even perhaps go to the effort of having your first name changed legally.
I suspect the diminutive or pet name for Richard... Dick... has cause you a lot of unneeded and unwanted misery during your life.
Please since the military is a problem to you write your congressman and request him to close this base down when the next brac comes out.
So what does that mean? Well, it means that Eielson Security Forces are permitted to patrol that area, and pull over anyone who is breaking the law..
Second of all, the Mr. Wilcox was breaking the law. And when they tried to write him up for it, he sped off, and a chase ensued, then resisting arrest. Just because the guy is 81 years old doesn’t make him any less dangerous.
Let’s look at it in a different light.
Same guy goes in to Wal-Mart and shoplifts. As he is leaving the store the alarm goes off and the greeter stops him. But instead of letting the greeter do his/her job, he runs in to the parking lot with the stolen merchandise. The greeter runs after him and the old man starts swearing at the greeter and shoves him to try to get away. The greeter finally is able to stop him and calls the police.
What now? We’d all be very disappointed in the old guy for shoplifting and saying “he got what he deserved, he knew he shouldn’t have been doing that.” On the flip side we would be praising the greeter for stopping him.
Gosh, what a very similar situation… Is it so hard to believe that Mr. Wilcox, a stubborn old man with a history of traffic violations and aggression towards law enforcement, is in the wrong?
Osama Bin Laden is going to be 53 years old in 2010; I suppose all of you think that we should be letting him off the hook to because he is getting old. We’re all just going to over look that fact that what he did is wrong, but it’s ok, because he’s old and can’t hurt anyone… Bull***t
I am a retired Air Force member. I am a Vietnam era vet. I know what is in the constitution, if in fact you are a military member and took a oath to defend the constitution and believe what you are writing in here, then you are in violation of your oath. Security Police are not the people that decide on instant punishment.
There is less than 1% of a chance for a taser to cause any real damage to this person, who broke the law. How would it have looked if the old man was tackled, stunned, put into an arm bar, or other less leathal use of force was utilized. There would have been a much higher probability of causing real damage to this offender. None the less, their actions, under the same circumstances would still have been justified.
If this guy would have been obeying the law or at a minimum acted his age this would have never happened. So who is really at fault. Wake up and smell the coffee!!!
The fine sheriff's of the north protecting the kings country side with the authority granted to them to act as representatives of the Base Commander.
How come the LEO's of this area think this is the lawless west, just because this is the last frontier? Ah... at least they didn't just start shooting like the troopers down town, nice lookin' Charger in the background, gives them that Miami vice twist.
I would like to see an article where our politicians weigh in on this, they are responsible to the people that elected them. Obviously, they have no problem with instantaneous justice. Judge, jury and prosecutor on wheels.
The criminal was pulled over for speeding and should have received a ticket. His actions afterwards is what got his ass tased! Anyone that cannot accept basic facts is wasting our oxygen...
So if given an order to attack civilians, you are just doing your job?
I think you might want to reaquaint yourself with the constitution.