Tanana bridge planned
by dermotcole
 Dermot Cole
2 months ago | 2760 views | 13 13 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

•The Alaska Railroad plans to begin work next summer on a $120 million bridge, the longest in Alaska.

The railroad bridge across the Tanana River in Salcha is to  be about 3,300 feet long, about 1,000 feet longer than the Yukon River Bridge. The bridge is billed by the railroad as the first step in extending the railroad 80 miles to Delta.

The bridge construction is expected to take four years. A levee several thousand feet long is to be built along the north side to help keep the Tanana within its banks in the Salcha area. The levee will not eliminate the Salcha flood threat, by the way, but it should reduce the problem.

The bridge is to be built over the river at a point south of the Salcha Fairgrounds.

The bridge would be open only to the military to begin with, providing access to training lands on the south side of the Tanana. It is to have railroad tracks in the middle and be set up for vehicle traffic as well, with an extra wide lane.

About $105 million of the money for the levee and bridge was approved by Congress in the 2007 and 2008 fiscal years in the military budget. Whether more will be forthcoming is a big question.

It might take $100 million more to build a rail connection to Eielson and hundreds of millions more to go to Delta, but that money has  not been approved by Congress for the state-owned railroad. It is unlikely that the state will propose to spend hundreds of millions on this project, so its future is uncertain.

The railroad is planning open houses Dec. 1 at the Salcha Elementary School and Dec. 2 at the North Pole Hotel. Both events are from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m.

The railroad is working with the Congressional delegation to get $12  million from a previous appropriation for the Fort Wainwright track realignment transferred to this job.

The environmental review of the project began four years ago and what is known as a Record of Decision is expected shortly.

There is more detail at www.northernrailextension.com.

The bridge would provide year-round access for the military to training areas south of the Tanana, access that is now limited to the winter months and travel on ice bridges.

If the other segments are built, then the railroad could ship freight for commercial purposes and run passenger trains for tourists, the project supporters say.






comments (13)
« Boodrow wrote on Thursday, Nov 19 at 08:55 AM »
Let me predict that cows will fly before we have railroad to Delta.
report abuse
« Yota99714 wrote on Wednesday, Nov 18 at 04:38 PM »
Q...I hope that means they're going to start with track relocation along the Rich. /Q

Nope. The next phase after the bridge is from where the rail turns to cross the Rich at the Chena Flood Project and run it out to Salcha to the bridge site, which is west of the Salcha Fairgrounds.

Whether the track in Moose Creek remains in place to service Eielson or be moved to the south of the base later on remains to be seen. Right now looks like status quo.
report abuse
« temarsh wrote on Wednesday, Nov 18 at 02:39 PM »
I hope that means they're going to start with track relocation along the Rich. That will really open up some more area for development.
report abuse
« mackie1 wrote on Wednesday, Nov 18 at 08:12 AM »
When the Flint Hills Refinery closes this will give Jeff Cook, another good job.Afterall,Every good bridge needs a Troll.
report abuse
« robir8 wrote on Wednesday, Nov 18 at 07:55 AM »
A 3000 footer. Cool. Fire up the 9's and get to building. We haven't built much for a long time.
report abuse
« seven51 wrote on Wednesday, Nov 18 at 06:39 AM »
A rail rode to Delta that's what we need. How about a couple of more grain silo's in Valdez' that was money well spent.
report abuse
« Larmex wrote on Wednesday, Nov 18 at 05:42 AM »
The decaying nuke-reactor at Ft.Greely needs to be moved in a containment vessel too big for railcars, a barge can effectively move this chunk of toxic junk to Hanford,WA for processing.

Just what we need, a bunch of fools moving something that is sitting quiet and doing NO harm what so ever. How stupid can one person be? The cost of building these projects are so inflated that it is a wonder anything can get done. Studies and years of wasted time and money put most of good ideas out of reach. This bridge should have been built 20 years ago, just as dams should be being build NOW, it will never get cheaper, stop the studys and get to work..
report abuse
« Yota99714 wrote on Tuesday, Nov 17 at 06:22 PM »
Oh- PS (I HATE this inverted thread setup, gawd). They don't need to barge out nuclear waste, they can just go ahead and dump it with the rest of the mess left behind at Greely. >snickers<

It seemed to me in the old report for that mess that it was better off left in place than to be disturbed.
report abuse
« Yota99714 wrote on Tuesday, Nov 17 at 06:19 PM »
DT- guess we'll get that all in the meeting. Gonna be meeting with a bunch of skeptics, myself included. The old cats that live out my way know what has been done to the Tanana in the past has made some problems,so they'll take some convincing that this is going to be okay.

My passed experience with the Army COE is that if they're involved in a moving water project, it'll be screwed up, so we'll see.
report abuse
« DistantThunder wrote on Tuesday, Nov 17 at 06:10 PM »
Yota99714 - contact Bob Thomas, he's one of the engineers behind this project, he has my contact info in his email..

about "hydrostatic"

A properly designed velocity channel of considerable length, width and depth will be nearly invisible from satellite when completed because it will be under the main channel of the existing river. This velocity channel can be designed to be throttled even under the terrific dynamics of ice-choked breakup and flooding conditions.

Designed depth is a key component of this type of project.
report abuse
« Yota99714 wrote on Tuesday, Nov 17 at 05:34 PM »
The levee will NOT aleviate flooding; can you say 'hydrostatic'? Those of us upstream will be flooded out for sure, esp if they build up the access road 3 dayem feet like they proposed a year or two ago.

I hope the folks in the right of way get a fair shake; at least better than the Borough would offer.

See ya that Tuesday.
report abuse
« DistantThunder wrote on Tuesday, Nov 17 at 04:26 PM »
We should get another bigger bucketline dredge in the Tanana and dredge a velocity channel from the south end of the airport runway all the way to Salcha or BigD. Near the international airport on the downstream end of the channel we would install an ice-dam flow-valve to control the river level to protect the estuarine environment for fish&fowl. The dredge spoils will build a solid railway bed and river levee. And the gold recovered will pay for the project and fund UAF too. The Ice-dam will be an evaporator field to supply heat-pump heat to the airport and industrial area. A bypass floodgate and river-locks can be built adjacent to the end of the ice-dam at the end of the velocity channel.

This will open up the whole southern end of the borough to barge access. Barge access will also benefit the long delayed environmental cleanup of Ft.Greely and Ft.Wainwright. The decaying nuke-reactor at Ft.Greely needs to be moved in a containment vessel too big for railcars, a barge can effectively move this chunk of toxic junk to Hanford,WA for processing.
report abuse
« NotPc wrote on Tuesday, Nov 17 at 03:59 PM »
democratic bridge to nowhere.
report abuse