Tammie Wilson reflects on her work with Love INC
by Jeff Richardson / jrichardson@newsminer.com
3 months ago | 1734 views | 25 25 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print


• Love INC 2006 tax return

• Love INC 2007 tax return

• Love INC 2008 tax return

FAIRBANKS — When Tammie Wilson names her proudest accomplishments in Fairbanks, her work with Love In the Name of Christ tops the list. The Fairbanks North Star Borough mayoral candidate helped lead the charitable organization in 2006 and 2007, first as a board member and later as its manager.

Those were unquestionably rough times for the faith-based organization, which helps the needy through a network of about 60 church affiliates. Love INC was on the brink of financial collapse while simultaneously working to construct a new 5,300-square-foot building in South Fairbanks.

During the course of a few months in 2007, the executive director quit; the entire paid staff resigned, was laid off or was fired; and a controversial $1 million federal grant was relinquished.

At the heart of it all was a philosophical rift among the board members that in some ways resembled the debate over the future of the borough. Wilson and others felt the organization had forgotten its roots while becoming distracted by the lure and influence of federal money. Local government acceptance of federal dollars has become one of Wilson’s campaign issues heading into Tuesday’s mayoral runoff.

“I think that’s always something you struggle with,” Wilson said on Monday, remembering the Love INC debate. “What do we want to be?”

Grant Shimanek, the executive director for Love INC at the time, said the issue divided the board, leaving the organization without clear support or direction. He resigned in early 2007, along with half the board of directors.

“It just came to the point where I felt we couldn’t do any more,” said Shimanek, who now works as an outreach pastor in Anchorage.

The Fatherhood Grant

At the heart of the debate was the Fatherhood Grant, which created a mentoring program paid for with federal funds. The five-year grant was renewable for $205,000 annually.

The Fatherhood Grant, which had been in place for slightly more than a year, was the largest grant Love INC had ever received. It allowed the organization to roughly double in size to about eight employees.

But it also became a source of concern among the board. The mentoring program started slowly, and it required a secular approach — no Christian proselytizing was allowed when federal funds were used.

Wilson also attributed some of Love INC’s financial mess to a heavy reliance on federal grant money. She said the imbalance of federal money to local contributions was an unhealthy mix.

At the request of the divided board, the grant was relinquished after slightly more than a year. Wilson characterized the move as a step toward getting Love INC back on the right path.

“It’s easy now to look back and say it had to happen. … For Love INC (to succeed) we had to go through the pains and get back to the true focus of the organization,” Wilson said.

But others involved in the debate saw the issue as more of a philosophical question than a financial one. The organization’s core role — a dispatch center for a wide variety of aid programs run by local churches — was still being funded through individual contributions and monthly $8,000 donations from its members.

“The philosophy was clearly, should this Christian organization be taking money with possible restrictions on what we could do with it?” said Martin Klein, the former treasurer who spent six years on the Love INC board.

Shimanek described Wilson as the leader of a board faction that wanted to limit Love INC’s scope to strictly working as a clearinghouse agency. He said the faction was adamantly opposed to accepting government grants or adding new programs.

From 2006 to 2008, Love INC’s revenue dropped from nearly $700,000 to less than $200,000, according to publicly available Internal Revenue Service records, largely because of the diminishing role of government assistance.

“She had an agenda, and that’s something she was able to accomplish,” Shimanek said of Wilson. “That’s all I’m able to say — she had her way.”

Others in the debate said the divisions weren’t quite so rigidly drawn. Former board president Alan Corrick said everyone wondered how much outreach to provide, while arriving at somewhat different conclusions.

Corrick, the pastor at Door of Hope Church, said all board members were concerned about becoming a broad-based social-service agency — “the Christian version of Tanana Chiefs Conference.”

Tough financial times

The debate occurred during a bleak financial stretch for Love INC, when it was struggling to make insurance payments or pay staff wages.

Layoffs came the week before Thanksgiving in 2007.

Terry Reichardt, a founding member of the 24-year-old organization, was part of an advisory committee that was formed to support Love INC. She said the organization was spending more money than it was collecting, and discord among its leadership prevented a solution.

“I don’t think the divided board led to the financial problems,” Reichardt said. “I think the divided board couldn’t figure out how to deal with the financial problems.”

The cause of the financial problems was complex, said Klein and Brad Johnston, the previous and current board treasurers. A downturn in local giving, the construction of a new building and a bickering board all contributed.

Both said the Fatherhood Grant probably wasn’t a big factor.

The organization was also dealing with an unfortunate mix-up among some donors. Another faith-based organization, Love Social Services, spent 2007 under scrutiny for fraudulently using $450,000 in federal funds. Murilda “Chris” Hayes and former Fairbanks city Mayor Jim Hayes, who led Love Social Services, were ultimately convicted of misusing the grants and sent to prison.

Johnston said Love INC was tarnished simply because it had a similar name.

“That did not help,” Johnston said. “That exacerbated the problem.”

Love INC ultimately climbed out of the hole by becoming an all-volunteer organization. Wilson resigned from the board to become a manager — first as a volunteer and briefly in a paid role — while philanthropists and community donors stepped in to help.

The organization offered referrals for about 900 people in each of the past two years, down about 10 percent from its average earlier in the decade.

A new executive director, Judy Dellinger, was hired a year ago. Love INC completed its new building last summer and sold its old headquarters a few months ago.

Johnston and Klein both credited Wilson for her volunteer work that helped keep Love INC afloat.

“She passionately believed in Love INC,” Klein said. “Even though we were diametrically opposed in our beliefs of what it should do.”

Contact staff writer Jeff Richardson at 459-7518.
comments (25)
« Navin wrote on Thursday, Oct 29 at 10:33 AM »
Tammie doesn't have the lust for power that Luke and his union buddies have. I really think she puts the interest of the public first. She's certainly a "better listener." I would pick Tammie Wilson way awead of a slimy smarmy politician.

report abuse
« Daybreak wrote on Thursday, Oct 29 at 06:39 AM »
As a registered republican and a Christian, I won’t be voting for Ms. Wilson. First, in a previous News Miner article, it was stated that Ms. Wilson came in and dismissed everyone one the staff of Love Inc. That isn’t the way you handle human relations. Secondly, if she was so great for the organization, why wasn’t she on the board that helped bring it back to life? I would have thought they would have sought her expertise and asked her to be on some sort of transitional team or a task force to bring it back to life. Perhaps she was apart of the problem? And how many employees has Ms. Wilson supervised? Does living here for 5-8 years give her the background to truly understand the ins and outs of raising a family here? Does she have the professional demeanor to talk not to just us “plain folk” but to also the folk that represent us in Juneau and in DC? I’ve heard her speak at Chamber and I don’t think so. Running the Borough isn’t about one or two issues that you can discuss on the radio. There are many, many critical issues that a mayor must face on a daily basis that are too boring to talk about. Fires, floods, funding, complicated finance issues. I want someone who people will turn to in the face of a crisis. Based on what I know regarding Love INC, Ms. Wilson is not it.
report abuse
« OnTheRoad wrote on Wednesday, Oct 28 at 07:31 PM »
OP, you forget that global warming is a religion.

Everyone believes in something, otherwise you would go crazy. It's just a matter of what

I believe Tammie gets my vote.
report abuse
« Riverman2 wrote on Wednesday, Oct 28 at 02:23 PM »
Sounds like Tammie Wilson never knew what the true focus of Love INC was, she only understood it was a stepping stone for her run for Borough Assembly. She doesn't know the difference between management and governance, they too are seen as obstacles.

If Tammie's constituents manage to get her elected, they deserve her, it won't be long be "recall" is her slogan.
report abuse
« jerry2815 wrote on Wednesday, Oct 28 at 11:14 AM »
I just read the letters to the editor from Ed Davis and looked up the references he cited. Tammy Wilson's address 889 Esro Rd. indeed looks like a junkyard. We have several of these in our borough and they are disgusting. They mess up the property values for other poeple in the area and cause a collapse in overall neighborhood morale. Sure, Tammy would certainly like a $92,500 a year job when she lacks experience, lacks time in Alaska, and does not set a good example in her habitat. I think we should call her out for what she is, the Junkyard Queen looking to fleece the FNSB.
report abuse
« hrdharry wrote on Wednesday, Oct 28 at 11:11 AM »
Must be tough being a liberal when all the money says, "In God We Trust".
report abuse
« Oh_please wrote on Wednesday, Oct 28 at 11:07 AM »
Sorry, you can't have it both ways. If you are going to target a Candidates' Christian 'character' for scorn and ridecule, we have a right to 'get a target lock' on the Christian voters.

Actually, Doug, what I was doing was mocking your phoney-baloney Christian Persecution Complex. It was your decision to begin the thread with it. If you pull that crap don't be offended when you're called on it, speaking of 'can't have it both ways.'
report abuse
« Oh_please wrote on Wednesday, Oct 28 at 11:05 AM »
Liberals want to help other people only if it is a Government run program paid for by force through the tax payers.

Ummmmmm..... Programs like Love Inc., there Ron? Did you not read the story?

From 2006 to 2008, Love INC’s revenue dropped from nearly $700,000 to less than $200,000, according to publicly available Internal Revenue Service records, largely because of the diminishing role of government assistance.

And, MAN, you must have been REALLY pissed at Bush's Office of Faith Based Initiatives, what with it being a 'Government run program paid for by force through the tax payers' and all, right? lol

Speaking in nothing but political cliches is not bolstering your case, dude.

report abuse
« Doug_in_Salcha wrote on Wednesday, Oct 28 at 11:02 AM »
Oh_please,

"Well, Ron, for starters most 'liberals' don't poison the political well by wielding their religious affiliation..."

Sure they do; many if not most Liberals are rabidly Atheist (or too ashamed of their Christian Religion) and make no attempt to conceal their disdain for Christians. Christians, on the other hand, are expected not to announce their Christian beliefs in an attempt to garner the Christian 'vote'.

Sorry, you can't have it both ways. If you are going to target a Candidates' Christian 'character' for scorn and ridecule, we have a right to 'get a target lock' on the Christian voters.
report abuse
« CoolRon wrote on Wednesday, Oct 28 at 10:52 AM »
Oh_please - So nothing is your answer. Just as I figured.

Liberals want to help other people only if it is a Government run program paid for by force through the tax payers.
report abuse
« countrygirlcha wrote on Wednesday, Oct 28 at 10:48 AM »
I do feel some of Love In The Name Of Christ's financial difficulties came from a mis-association with the Hayes Love Social Services Inc.
report abuse
« Oh_please wrote on Wednesday, Oct 28 at 10:11 AM »
What has a liberal done for their fellow humans lately?

Well, Ron, for starters most 'liberals' don't poison the political well by wielding their religious affiliation in an attempt at divisive political gain.
report abuse
« Theabowman wrote on Wednesday, Oct 28 at 10:03 AM »
Well there is more to this story than can be reported and that is because personnel matters are confidential. What happened after Love Inc fell apart is that in order to keep it going and make good use of the building that Dennis Wise so generously donated, a group of the mainline pastors got together, recruited reasonable board members and provided some organizational expertise. There is way more to the story than not agreeing on a grant and all the blame shoul not fall on Tammie either. But bottom line, she won the battle but lost the war because as you see, she's no longer an employee there or really anywhere else. If she owns a business, she's got no business license. I might vote for Grammie Eppler who operated an appliance store but not for Tammie as mayor. Oh and yesterday's story about her campaign pal, Todd Larson. I recall his mayoral run on the sole issue that same sex partners of employees should not be able to get dependent coverage--that was literally all he could talk about. So if Todd is one of her advisors, geesh!
report abuse
« CoolRon wrote on Wednesday, Oct 28 at 09:54 AM »
Before you Christian hating liberals get too far into the anit-Love Inc. thing maybe you should find out what they have done for folks around here. A few years back a lady with children had her husband run off on her. She was not a Christian nor a member of any church (that’s just for clarification). Her heater was broken and it was -20 or so. She did not have the money to repair her heater so Love Inc. contacted my boss. My boss decided that we could repair her heater for free as a donation to Love Inc. I came in after work on my own time (donated) and put in over $700.00 in labor and parts to get her heater going. What has a liberal done for their fellow humans lately?
report abuse
« dukit22 wrote on Wednesday, Oct 28 at 08:54 AM »
Let me get this straight, while Ms. Wilson ran Love Inc, it fell apart? And she wants to be the Borough Mayor?

NOT a good idea.
report abuse
« anonymous wrote on Wednesday, Oct 28 at 08:54 AM »
report abuse
« Plebeian wrote on Wednesday, Oct 28 at 08:36 AM »
@ DOWNGOESTAMMIE

So because they didn't bring in as much Government money, that's a BAD thing?

Were they still accomplishing their goals? If so, isn't it a GOOD thing that they did it with less money?

Or am I living in Bizarro world and have that backwards.
report abuse
« TurkBurlington wrote on Wednesday, Oct 28 at 08:27 AM »
So nice I'm postin' it twice - hell, makes me look clairvoyant. Originally posted yesterday...

Speaking of "love", lets REALLY get down to brass tacks: Do we really want Our Community to Experience the LOVE? Love Inc, that is...

Like a lot of folks of her stripe - certainly the folks Ms. Wilson is relying most heavily upon for her support and council, like the Interior Taliban - Ms. Wilson don't much care for "gub-ment" - don't trust it, don't like it, don't think we (everybody but her and hers, noting that she makes more off her Assembly pay checks than her much vaunted, out of state, prop-tay) should be "relyin' on it". And she put that "theory" into active practice at LOVE Inc:

Ms. Wilson thought Love Inc was too heavily reliant on federal grants for its funding. So what does Ms. Wilson do? Does she simply direct the organization not to apply for or accept anymore federal grants? Oh no no no - Ms. Wilson sets out to ensure that Love Inc CAN'T RECEIVE anymore federal grants: she actively goes out to turn an ailing yet serviceable service organization into one so dysfunctional and crippled that the feds won't allow it funds.

Guess what organization in Our Community also gets lots of federal money - to do things like pave the streets and fund the schools. That's right, the Borough "gub-ment". And guess what those federal funds help off-set. That's right, locally generated tax revenues.

Will pesky facts like that deter Ms. Wilson? Who knows. But what we can know is that Ms. Wilson has a proven record of putting her "theories" about gub-ment "into practice".

So, who's ready for three years of Ms. Wilson showin' the entire North Star Borough "The LOVE"?
report abuse
« Oh_please wrote on Wednesday, Oct 28 at 07:59 AM »
report abuse