by Christopher Eshleman / ceshleman@newsminer.com
2 months ago | 1814 views | 11

|
4 
|
|
FAIRBANKS — State officials said Tuesday night that efforts to spur construction of a massive natural gas pipeline are on schedule despite skepticism from critics and some lawmakers.
The plan, pitched by former Gov. Sarah Palin under the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act, is projected to have drawn
$150 million in investments from the team of TransCanada and Exxon Mobil by mid-summer, according to an October progress report.
State commissioners and a federal coordinator said in Fairbanks that the spending is one sign their effort is working. Speaking at West Valley High School, the group said TransCanada should be confident as it seeks participation from potential gas suppliers this spring for a pipeline that would connect Alaska’s vast North Slope gas fields to markets.
Revenue Commissioner Pat Galvin noted the act’s basic goal was to spark momentum toward construction of such a line.
“We’ve achieved that in spades,” he said, adding that a competing project, dubbed Denali, also has moved ahead under BP and ConocoPhillips.
TransCanada and Exxon are working under exclusive, state-offered development incentives included in the 2007 act. BP and ConocoPhillips are working without those incentives.
Opinion among state lawmakers and industry watchers remains divided about whether competing projects can connect natural gas — beyond small, existing export projects — to the international marketplace. Former Gov. Frank Murkowski, a vocal critic of AGIA, continued to push Tuesday for critical debate regarding the state’s energy policies.
Murkowski told Fairbanks university students, faculty and visitors that a decision by Palin, his successor as governor, to spark competition between potential pipeline builders has left the state with a divided front. He said that result, coupled with energy companies’ discoveries of natural gas reserves within shale deposits in other U.S. states, compounds coming revenue troubles as oil production here dwindles.
Murkowski said state leaders must rework tax frameworks to spark investment in oil and gas production and to convince energy companies to commit gas holdings to a future pipeline.
“Those are fundamental prerequisites associated with the economic certainty of a gas line,” Murkowski said. He called TransCanada “a great company” but repeated his concern that it lacks control over gas leases, control the three energy companies hold.
State officials suggest such concerns are misplaced. Tom Irwin, the state’s resources commissioner, said even with recent technological improvements, shale-trapped gas in other states can’t meet the country’s long-term demand.
“Our gas competes” with other domestic reserves, Irwin said.
A progress report on AGIA, released to lawmakers on Halloween, said despite short-term volatility, long-term forecasted natural gas prices and long-range North American energy demand projections have shown “little impact” from the global economic roller-coaster. It acknowledges shale gas development, aided by better production technology, has grown but points to other signs, including the fact that the privately led Denali project is in the works, as indication the market for Alaska’s gas is alive.
Contact staff writer Christopher Eshleman at 459-7582.
This crowds' idea of development for Alaska is to see lots of cash running through gov't beaurocratic and big business investors hands. Gotta be a 'mega-project' big enough that gov't spending can get sloppy and extravagent, so they can suck up significant amounts.
If we do this gas project their way, it'll be just like the oil-pipeline's hey day. Gov't rolling in cash, handing it out irresponibly by the fistfull to 1/2 baked 'development' projects promoted by their cronies, and nothing to show for it afterward - still a 3rd world country, exporting our raw resources cheap, begging, dependent on multi-national corp.s for their interest in exploitig our resource, and paying through the nose on the consumer market for expensively imported supplies.
I like Distant Thunder's ideas. We need to start using our resources ourselves, rather than more 'mega-projects' to funnel them out of State as fast as possible.
Shale gas?
Yes, lots of it. Conventional gas, yes, and lots of it from every corner (sic) of the world, not just the volatile Middle East.
British Columbia has huge reserves coming on line.
The Bush administration approved domestic LNG tanker construction under federal financing in 2008 for the domestic trade on both U.S. coasts. Aker Shipyards, Philadelphia.
A $50 billion investment in a steel gasline portends our gas going overseas to China and the rest of Asia after being transferred into Canadian
(Imperial/Exxon and ConocoPhillips, etc) hands after crossing the border at dirt-cheap rates.
Then they'll suck the costs of that endeavor right out of Alaska's share and make the big profits on both dirty Tar Sands oil and overseas export, plus the removal of the valuable gas molecules for cCnada's existing petrochemical industry.
Sounds like a real good deal to me.
THEY'RE RIPPING US OFF!
Bill Walker has the answer, and it will happen if he is elected Governor! Cut the losses now, build the "Port Authority Alaskan Gas Pipeline", it doesn't have to be the only line, but I say it should be the first.
Take care of the in state needs, reopen the now silent factory in Kenai that was moth-balled for lack of cheap gas. I think if more people would take a drive down on the Kenai to see the AGRIUM plant, they would have a better idea of the travisty. To have a facility like that sitting idle while unemployment here is rising is a sin.
Long-awaited pipeline funnels gas across 8 states
By MEAD GRUVER
Associated Press Writer
Advertisement
CHEYENNE, Wyo. (AP) -- A 1,679-mile pipeline crossing eight states is now fully completed and funneling natural gas from Wyoming and Colorado to the eastern edge of Ohio.
The long-awaited Rockies Express Pipeline became fully operational Nov. 12 following the recent completion of the final 195-mile section between Warren and Monroe counties in eastern Ohio. The $6.8 billion pipeline carries 1.8 billion cubic feet of gas, enough to heat 4 million homes, and took three years to complete.
Wyoming gas producers and state officials are hopeful that the ability to export more gas to markets in the East will mean better prices and revenue.
"We have for a long time in Wyoming wanted to get, with the gas we produce, farther east," Gov. Dave Freudenthal said in a news conference Tuesday with pipeline officials. "This does it for us."
Insufficient pipeline capacity is one reason why prices at the Opal Hub in western Wyoming have lagged behind prices at other natural gas pricing points such as the Henry Hub in Louisiana. The new pipeline also runs through Nebraska, Kansas, Missouri, Illinois and Indiana.
Thanks in part to the Rockies Express, prices at the Opal hub have tracked more closely to prices at other hubs since last summer, said Mark Doelger, a former Wyoming Pipeline Authority chairman who had a hand in the project.
The authority initially committed $3 billion in bonds but the project got enough private investors so that the agency never had to sell them.
Houston-based Kinder Morgan Energy Partners built the pipeline and owns 50 percent of it. Sempra Pipelines and Storage, a unit of San Diego-based Sempra, and Houston-based ConocoPhillips each has a 25-percent stake in the pipeline.
Who cares what Frank Murkowski thinks?
Just like the oil line the gas line will get built when the oil companys decide to build it, untill then its nothing but hot air and meetings to justify their jobs and get re-elected.
What is being done about the dams? Something they can do, but to try to compete with big oil is just not as much fun as wasting money on studys. COME ON build a dam and get off your butts.
Not much discussion on the in-state use of North Slope gas for Alaska .. short-term, mid-term or long-term.
Ex-governor Frank Murkowski must have landed one of those cushy lobbyist jobs for BIG OIL. Ex-governor Sarah Palin has been writing a fiction book. Anybody know what ex-governor Tony Knowles is up to lately?