North Pole water testing continues
2 months ago | 542 views | 2 2 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
FAIRBANKS — The water utility in North Pole continues to test for contamination in the city water supply, the city services director said on Friday.

The city’s primary well remains in operation after test results were clean.

A secondary well was shut down after a trace amount of the chemical sulfolane was found in the water.

City Services Director Bill Butler said weekly testing on the primary well is being done as a precaution.

“It’s just so that we are well aware of the condition of the city’s water supply,” he said.

The testing will take place regularly during the next several weeks.

The water utility has about 525 residential and commercial customers, Butler said. Private wells in the city also are being tested, and some residents are being encouraged to drink bottled water.

Sulfolane is used to make fuel at the Flint Hill Resources refinery.

The chemical spill is believed to have happened before 2000, when the chemical was discovered in groundwater monitoring wells near the plant, according to the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation.

The health effects of long-term exposure to trace amounts of sulfolane are not clear.

Laboratory animals exposed to high levels of the chemical have shown changes to organs, including the liver, and the nervous and immune systems, according to the DEC.

A town meeting is scheduled for 7 p.m. Monday at North Pole High School.
comments (2)
« Pearl=W wrote on Saturday, Nov 21 at 11:57 AM »
They [the refinery] discovered this stuff had entered the groundwater in 2000!? With how permiable soils are in the bottomlands, they should have known then that it would be in people's wells shortly, and been doing rigorous monitoring, as well as taking vigorous action to clear it up and limit it's spread, if possible. And it does seem like it's something people in the area should have been warned about long ago. How can the refinery be characterized as "a good neighbor", under the circumstances? Just because they're a source of income? How much damage to individuals is the local gov't willing to 'sell', for money in their coffers? Is this stuff absorbed through the skin? Does anybody know?
report abuse
« TheAntiClinger wrote on Saturday, Nov 21 at 08:58 AM »
Who is paying for the testing and will Flint Hills be paying folks for the bottled water and the inconvenience of not being able to use water as before? Will Flint Hills be cleaning up the mess? Will they pay for the reduction in property values area-wide which might come from a nice toxic waste problem? Does the DNM actually do any reporting or is it just gather a few lines and print them? Does the DNM have anything from articles before 2000 explaining the spill so we can get some perspective? What has been done since to clean up? Just a few things that come to mind. I would have thought the DNM would have wondered the same things.

Imagine, our own little Love Canal. Think of the stories. Go for the gusto DNM.
report abuse