Contaminated North Pole water is unknown health threat
by Amanda Bohman / abohman@newsminer.com
2 months ago | 3769 views | 18 18 comments | 14 14 recommendations | email to a friend | print
North Pole residents listen to environmental experts during a community meeting at North Pole High School to address a recent test of a city water well showing trace amount of the chemical sulfolane Monday evening, Nov. 23, 2009. - John Wagner/News-Miner
North Pole residents listen to environmental experts during a community meeting at North Pole High School to address a recent test of a city water well showing trace amount of the chemical sulfolane Monday evening, Nov. 23, 2009. - John Wagner/News-Miner
slideshow
Flint Hills Resources vice president of Alaska operations Mark Gregory, foreground, addresses public concern regarding a recent test of a North Pole city water well showing trace amount of the chemical sulfolane Monday evening, Nov. 23, 2009, during a community meeting at North Pole High School.  Also pictured from left are Mayor Doug Isaacson, State of Alaska drinking water program compliance manager Cindy Christian, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation contaminated sites program manager Ann Farris and Alaska Division of Public Health environmental public health program manager Lori Verbrugge. - John Wagner/News-Miner
Flint Hills Resources vice president of Alaska operations Mark Gregory, foreground, addresses public concern regarding a recent test of a North Pole city water well showing trace amount of the chemical sulfolane Monday evening, Nov. 23, 2009, during a community meeting at North Pole High School. Also pictured from left are Mayor Doug Isaacson, State of Alaska drinking water program compliance manager Cindy Christian, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation contaminated sites program manager Ann Farris and Alaska Division of Public Health environmental public health program manager Lori Verbrugge. - John Wagner/News-Miner
slideshow
State of Alaska Drinking Water Program compliance manager Cindy Christian addresses public concern regarding a recent test of a North Pole city water well showing trace amount of the chemical sulfolane Monday evening, Nov. 23, 2009, during a community meeting at North Pole High School. - John Wagner/News-Miner
State of Alaska Drinking Water Program compliance manager Cindy Christian addresses public concern regarding a recent test of a North Pole city water well showing trace amount of the chemical sulfolane Monday evening, Nov. 23, 2009, during a community meeting at North Pole High School. - John Wagner/News-Miner
slideshow
NORTH POLE — At least six households near the Flint Hills Resources refinery learned in the past few months that their drinking water is tainted with an industrial chemical whose long-term health effects are largely unknown.

On Monday, about 80 people gathered at North Pole High School to hear from scientists and Flint Hills Resources about how the chemical, sulfolane, got into the water and what is being done about it.

Mark Gregory, vice president of Flint Hills’ Alaska operations, said the leaking of sulfolane into the local water system came as a surprise to Flint Hills. Officials are focused on figuring out how far and wide the chemical has spread.

“We are very much concerned with trying to understand where this plume is at,” he said.

Routine testing by Flint Hills uncovered the groundwater contamination this fall.

Sulfolane, used to make fuel, is not among the hundreds of chemicals normally regulated in drinking water, said Cindy Christian, a state drinking water expert.

It bonds easily with water, which is how a sulfolane spill sometime before 2000 managed to leach into the water table near the refinery, contaminating an unknown number of private wells and one of the wells that feeds the city water system. That well has since been disconnected from North Pole water mains.

“I thought my water was safe,” said Janet Jahn, a schoolteacher who built a house northwest of the refinery in 1979.

Almost two weeks ago, a strange car appeared in her driveway. The occupants, representatives of Flint Hills, asked if they could test her water and provided her a water cooler, advising her not to drink the well water she’d been using for decades.

“When they gave me the water, I switched,” Jahn said. “I do as I’m told.”

Chris Brenner, a 68-year-old retired schoolteacher who lives near Jahn, also switched to bottled water. Flint Hills paid her a similar visit.

Brenner had an ovarian tumor removed in 2002 and a tumor removed from her thyroid earlier this year, she said.

“It could have been the chemical thing, of course I think that,” she said.

Brenner enlisted the help of her son to pull up everything she could about sulfolane on the Internet, she said.

Lori Verbrugge, a toxicologist with the state Division of Public Health, said officials are still trying to determine how much, if any, sulfolane is safe in drinking water. They hope to have a number in a few months.

“It doesn’t accumulate in your body,” she said. “When you get it in your body, it’s metabolized very rapidly.”

Tracy Harmon, a restaurant manager whose family relies on the city water system, said his family has switched to bottled water even though the city’s primary well is purported to be untainted.

“It’s distressing,” he said. “Flint Hills is being proactive, but I hope this doesn’t kill my property value that much.”

Gregory said Flint Hills will work with its neighbors to ensure residents have access to clean water.

“Come spring here, we hope to have a more permanent solution,” he said.

Contact staff writer Amanda Bohman at 459-7544.
comments (18)
« neighbor72 wrote on Wednesday, Nov 25 at 02:27 PM »
"Meth Pole should be bulldozed under and turned into a weapons range for the Air Force. Exterminate the amphetamine manufacturers like the cockroaches they are, they probably had something to do with this contamination anyway."

Oh come on now.....same could be said for the, crime infested gang ridden sqaurebanks well on its way to becoming the next skankorage.....but we don't need to go there now do we.
report abuse
« Samm_redux wrote on Wednesday, Nov 25 at 01:01 PM »
LostAlaskan99712 - If you turned it into a weapons range for the Air Force first you would save the cost of bulldozing it. ;-)
report abuse
« LostAlaskan99712 wrote on Wednesday, Nov 25 at 12:50 PM »
Meth Pole should be bulldozed under and turned into a weapons range for the Air Force. Exterminate the amphetamine manufacturers like the cockroaches they are, they probably had something to do with this contamination anyway.
report abuse
« akexplorer wrote on Tuesday, Nov 24 at 08:24 PM »
"Flint Hills is being proactive about it. Doing the right thing - even though the spill did not happen on their watch."--Glacierwolf

Didn't happen on their watch? Doesn't the article explicitly say

"sometime before 2000 managed to leach into the water table"

am I missing something? BTW, justasking is justanidiot.

report abuse
« jerry2815 wrote on Tuesday, Nov 24 at 08:10 PM »
So what else is new? None of North Pole area water from wells is fit to drink or wash clothes with. All my white underwear looks like it is still dirty after washing in NP well water. The whole area should be condemned. Water from areas around the refinery has been contaminated for 30 years or more...nothing new. By the way remember that woman that worked at the refinery lab, the one that used to blow the whistle on them all the time. I heard she died young. So people be careful, you too may die young if you make too much noise. I also heard that the early spills at the refinery warrant a major cleanup and that whoever buys the refinery has ten years before they have to do the work and that is why they keep selling the refinery about every 9 years or so.
report abuse
« Navin wrote on Tuesday, Nov 24 at 04:02 PM »
justasking is juststupid. Like they say, your right to swing your fist ends where my nose begins.
report abuse
« justasking wrote on Tuesday, Nov 24 at 03:52 PM »
people have the right to do what they want on thier PRIVATE PROPERTY

just ask Tammie
report abuse
« neighbor72 wrote on Tuesday, Nov 24 at 03:46 PM »
"the refinery has private property rights to dump chemicals on its PRIVATE PROPERTY if you don't like it buy thier property pay their taxes and do with it like you like."

Not sure where you get your information at but I can assure you that your statement is completely false. NOBODY has the right to dump toxic chemicals on the ground or in the water regardless if the property is their own personal property or not. You do this, accidently or not and you are fiscally responsible for the clean up and repricussions from the spill...not to mention potential jail time if the release was intentional. I can direct you to the Alaska Department Of Environmental Conservation's website with more information on this matter if you would like.
report abuse
« justasking wrote on Tuesday, Nov 24 at 03:18 PM »
the refinery has private property rights to dump chemicals on its PRIVATE PROPERTY if you don't like it buy thier property pay their taxes and do with it like you like.
report abuse
« Navin wrote on Tuesday, Nov 24 at 03:02 PM »
The nutcase liberals are already blaming this on Tammie Wilson.
report abuse
« Samm_redux wrote on Tuesday, Nov 24 at 12:23 PM »
I have long said... far longer than the refinery has been there... there must be something in the water out there at North Pole.
report abuse
« Glacierwolf wrote on Tuesday, Nov 24 at 08:34 AM »
Steelrsv. I live in the effected area. Smack in the middle of it. Eventually this 'plume' will be right under my home - 65 to 120 feet below my home to be exact. But, everyone in the neighborhood is on city water - so no problem. When my kids try to dig to China, they don't ever get much past the 3 foot level....... If the sulfoline does reach the surface, it is quickly eaten by microbes that find it yummy. I have no issues with it,

Now, people not on city water with a well? If they live in an area where they cannot easily connect to city water - that my friend is a whole different ball of wax! Their house value is gonna drop quicker than Obamma's approval rating. I would not be shocked if Flint Hills did not offer to pay to connect them up, or, eventually purchase the property - I have that much faith in Jeff Cook and Mark Gregory. If it were not for these two fine gentlemen - last nights gathering would have been nothing but pitchforks and torches.

So long as Flint Hills keeps people of this caliber on staff - I think we are gonna pull though this in the long run. If this had been any other company in any East Coast town - they would have quietly closed down once the initial test results came in..... that is a fact I witnessed over and over in Mass, Maine, and RI as a kid growing up there.

Isanove - if your home has a well and was even anywhere near the effected area - FHR would have contacted you already and offered free testing. I am sure you can contact them for free testing if you think you need it.
report abuse
« steelrsrv wrote on Tuesday, Nov 24 at 08:09 AM »
"House values are the least of the worries" what?!?!

Yeah I am sure that homes next to a refinery with contaminated well water are flying off the shelves. What world do you live in?

report abuse
« Glacierwolf wrote on Tuesday, Nov 24 at 07:06 AM »
House values are the least of the worries - sink a well in the middle of any high density residential building area in the world and you will find something - usually fecal coloforms - but always something. Oil from botched driveway oil changes your dad did back in the 1970's are a prime suspect.

Flint Hills is being proactive about it. Doing the right thing - even though the spill did not happen on their watch.

report abuse
« rmtrevino wrote on Tuesday, Nov 24 at 07:01 AM »
I don't personally believe in govt regulations. But regulations are needed to insure "good" water is maintained for the communiity. In my community, we had natural radioactive particles. The water company had to drill another well regardless of the cost. The reason we pay taxes is to insure we have the infrastructure to maintain a good water system. On a practical note, drinking the water has minimal impact on folks that are approaching end of life but this could be unhealthy for very young people.
report abuse
« Isanova~ wrote on Tuesday, Nov 24 at 05:52 AM »
Does anyone know where one can get their water tested for it, and how much?

Why aren't we more concerned about how the leak happened, regardless of how bad the chemical is!
report abuse
« mnguardian01 wrote on Tuesday, Nov 24 at 05:01 AM »
The chemical in question can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sulfolane and being a scientist I wouldn't want it in MY water. Sionix may be able to help. check out www.mngeos.com click on Sionix and from there you can log on to the company web site.
report abuse
« James_Brooks_FDNM wrote on Tuesday, Nov 24 at 12:12 AM »
For further information on this, check out the DEC's incident Web site.
report abuse