Conservation groups urging stop to Tongass timber sales
by Mary Pemberton/The Associated Press
3 months ago | 840 views | 14 14 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print
ANCHORAGE, Alaska - Nearly a dozen conservation groups are appealing to Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to put a stop to two timber sales in the Tongass National Forest.

The groups say both sales would cut old-growth trees in roadless areas of the Tongass - the largest national forest in the United States.

The groups - including conservation heavy-hitters such as the Sierra Club, the National Audubon Society, Defenders of Wildlife and the Wilderness Society - are asking Vilsack to uphold President Barack Obama's commitment to protect undeveloped areas in the national forests.

They are making the appeal this week and next in an ad running in two publications seen primarily inside the Washington, D.C., beltway: CongressDaily and Politico.

The ad says in bold, white letters, "Secretary Vilsack, now it's up to you to protect our Tongass rainforest."

In a break with the previous Bush administration, Obama promised during the presidential campaign to support a 2001 Clinton administration rule to protect roadless areas in national forests from commercial logging.

Then, last May Vilsack said he would personally review proposals to log in roadless areas.

The conservation groups are objecting to a timber sale planned for Kupreanof Island. The Central Kupreanof timber harvest would require 15 miles of new roads at a $6 million cost to taxpayers. The other timber sale on Suemez Island, the Sue timber sale, would require 2.2 miles of new roads.

Both sales include inventoried roadless areas that are covered under the 2001 roadless rule, Jane Danowitz, director of the Pew Environment Group's U.S. public lands program, said Thursday.

Alaska Forest Service officials by advancing the sales are out-of-step with the stated intentions of the new administration, Danowitz said.

"It is now up to Secretary Vilsack to honor that commitment by stopping new roadless area logging in the Tongass and giving this crown jewel the full protection it deserves," she said.

Vilsack's May directive gave him sole decision-making authority over all proposed forest management or road construction projects in designated roadless areas in all states except Idaho. The Tongass was exempted from roadless protection in 2003.

Forest Service spokesman Ray Massey said the 2008 Tongass forest plan says that the agency will use low-value inventory in roadless areas to meet timber demands.

"It says it right in the plan. This should not be a surprise to anybody that we are doing this," he said. "You have to get it somewhere."

In July, Vilsack approved a timber sale in a roadless area of the Tongass. The sale allows Pacific Log and Lumber to clear-cut about 380 acres. About nine miles of roads will be constructed.

comments (14)
« bubbo wrote on Sunday, Oct 25 at 06:09 PM »
Have you seen the regeneration areas down on the Tongass? I can guarentee its still a forest, at least in the areas that the Forest Service manages, don't forget that native corporations also are cutting down there with less restrictions then the feds.

Has anyone heard of helicopter logging???? seriously, I bet some of those plots are helilog only, you don't need a road for that!
report abuse
« LostAlaskan99712 wrote on Saturday, Oct 24 at 08:57 AM »
Blue- we did used to "do things" in this country, sometimes a little too much (like suppressing wildfires).

Like it or not it's the forest services own fault for all those charred trees as they had stamped out every single little fire that started in that park since it was "created". Pine forests NEED fire and you don't make anything better at all by letting the duff build up and small trees and shrubs grow in between large pine trees for years and years.

Everyone thought the park was "ruined" after the fire, then after all the new growth came up and animals started wandering/feeding in places where they couldn't before- most everyone realized that that fire was probably the best thing to happen for Yellowstone.

The worst thing you can do to a pine forest is not allow a grass fire to "clean-up" every 10 years or so......wait, actually- the "worst" thing you can do to any forest is saw it down, as you cannot "replant" a forest, only trees.

(and planting a bunch of trees in the ground does NOT make a forest, btw)
report abuse
« AKLegacy wrote on Saturday, Oct 24 at 07:10 AM »
greater good makes a good point. Why should taxpayers subsidize for-profit logging companies by building roads?

The forest service has been selling out the people for decades - selling rain forest and other woods at bargain basement prices to Japanese and other companies who couldn't care less about the damage they were doing.

There's a difference between being pro-development and being a whore for development. Knee jerk "development good!" reactions fail to look at all available information that help us make wiser, more self-interested decisions.

report abuse
« salcha-nancy wrote on Saturday, Oct 24 at 06:30 AM »
The Tongass is already clear-cut. No more roads. Do we want our forest to look like Washington state. Hug a tree today.
report abuse
« majast2211 wrote on Friday, Oct 23 at 09:55 PM »
i wish alaskan groups would stand up for alaskan causes. i feel like outside groups give this less credibility.
report abuse
« noainc wrote on Friday, Oct 23 at 08:38 PM »
Wonder why there are no jobs and the economy is gone. All over the country everything that makes sense is shut down. Logging off timber is necessary for a healthy forest, and the habitat in cleared areas becomes excellent for wildlife.

report abuse
« blue5011 wrote on Friday, Oct 23 at 04:36 PM »
LostAlaskan99712 wrote on Friday,

blue- forest fire is a natural thing, would YOU like to pay to have all that charred lumber removed?

(I think logging in a national park is illegal anyway.)

Make it legal or whatever it takes. Leaving all that charred wood and trees is criminal in my mind. The value of the lumber would pay for itself. Just cannot let trees grow unchecked. We used to DO things in this country--now, way too much regulation.
report abuse
« greatergood? wrote on Friday, Oct 23 at 03:09 PM »
is this sale subsidized in any way? who pays for roadbuilding, and who gets the revenues? Are benefits greater than costs? Can someone please tell me how it works. I do not understand all details in a timber sale.
report abuse
« arcticnomad wrote on Friday, Oct 23 at 10:45 AM »
When are people going to realize that for these groups, this is a RELIGIOUS cause for them. Logging and mining (and any other resource extraction) is an attack on their god, and we've let them shove their religion down our throats. In this day and age of over the top regulation, there are plenty of safeguards in place to keep companies from detroying an area when resources are harvested. The notion that there should be "sacred" places that cannot be touched is simply foolishness.
report abuse
« bubbo wrote on Friday, Oct 23 at 09:55 AM »
Granted forest fires are a natural thing, it should be policy that anytime a fire accures that logging be permitted to remove any trees that are of quality, they've done it in Alaska and the lumber is amazing with cool blue streaks. Else where enviromentalist get there way and millions of board feet are laid to waste, ie the Biscuit fire in OR is a good example of good lumber left to rot.

Hopefully Secretary Vilsack has a back bone to stand up to the enviromentalists, unlike so many politicains that give in. There is nothing wrong with maintaining a sustainable renewable resource. Theres so many rules and regulations on harvesting that restrict the way timber plots are set up, its rediculous to even think that there going to harm anything.
report abuse
« free_thinker wrote on Friday, Oct 23 at 08:02 AM »
pave the planet
report abuse
« LostAlaskan99712 wrote on Friday, Oct 23 at 07:12 AM »
blue- forest fire is a natural thing, would YOU like to pay to have all that charred lumber removed?

(I think logging in a national park is illegal anyway.)
report abuse
« blue5011 wrote on Friday, Oct 23 at 06:47 AM »
Recently visited Yellowstone Nat Park. The damage by fire is still evident. What is also evident is that the park ***should have logged out*** some of the timber. OK it's pristine, OK it's natural. But what is natural and pristine about the total destruction of a forest fire? I am not calling for clear cutting, just a reasonable few acre patch here, another patch there. Surely there are some bright folks who can figure this out.
report abuse
« jwcehc wrote on Friday, Oct 23 at 06:24 AM »
Once again the enviro nuts show their true colors that they want to turn the Tongass into a park and will say anything to get there. After spending years working on the current Tongass management plan with all users, and coming to an agreement, they are now going back on their word.

It is finally time to push back and re-create jobs in SE Alaska by harvesting a RENEWABLE resource!
report abuse