by Mary Pemberton/The Associated Press
3 months ago | 840 views | 14

|
4 
|
|
ANCHORAGE, Alaska - Nearly a dozen conservation groups are appealing to Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to put a stop to two timber sales in the Tongass National Forest.
The groups say both sales would cut old-growth trees in roadless areas of the Tongass - the largest national forest in the United States.
The groups - including conservation heavy-hitters such as the Sierra Club, the National Audubon Society, Defenders of Wildlife and the Wilderness Society - are asking Vilsack to uphold President Barack Obama's commitment to protect undeveloped areas in the national forests.
They are making the appeal this week and next in an ad running in two publications seen primarily inside the Washington, D.C., beltway: CongressDaily and Politico.
The ad says in bold, white letters, "Secretary Vilsack, now it's up to you to protect our Tongass rainforest."
In a break with the previous Bush administration, Obama promised during the presidential campaign to support a 2001 Clinton administration rule to protect roadless areas in national forests from commercial logging.
Then, last May Vilsack said he would personally review proposals to log in roadless areas.
The conservation groups are objecting to a timber sale planned for Kupreanof Island. The Central Kupreanof timber harvest would require 15 miles of new roads at a $6 million cost to taxpayers. The other timber sale on Suemez Island, the Sue timber sale, would require 2.2 miles of new roads.
Both sales include inventoried roadless areas that are covered under the 2001 roadless rule, Jane Danowitz, director of the Pew Environment Group's U.S. public lands program, said Thursday.
Alaska Forest Service officials by advancing the sales are out-of-step with the stated intentions of the new administration, Danowitz said.
"It is now up to Secretary Vilsack to honor that commitment by stopping new roadless area logging in the Tongass and giving this crown jewel the full protection it deserves," she said.
Vilsack's May directive gave him sole decision-making authority over all proposed forest management or road construction projects in designated roadless areas in all states except Idaho. The Tongass was exempted from roadless protection in 2003.
Forest Service spokesman Ray Massey said the 2008 Tongass forest plan says that the agency will use low-value inventory in roadless areas to meet timber demands.
"It says it right in the plan. This should not be a surprise to anybody that we are doing this," he said. "You have to get it somewhere."
In July, Vilsack approved a timber sale in a roadless area of the Tongass. The sale allows Pacific Log and Lumber to clear-cut about 380 acres. About nine miles of roads will be constructed.
Has anyone heard of helicopter logging???? seriously, I bet some of those plots are helilog only, you don't need a road for that!
Like it or not it's the forest services own fault for all those charred trees as they had stamped out every single little fire that started in that park since it was "created". Pine forests NEED fire and you don't make anything better at all by letting the duff build up and small trees and shrubs grow in between large pine trees for years and years.
Everyone thought the park was "ruined" after the fire, then after all the new growth came up and animals started wandering/feeding in places where they couldn't before- most everyone realized that that fire was probably the best thing to happen for Yellowstone.
The worst thing you can do to a pine forest is not allow a grass fire to "clean-up" every 10 years or so......wait, actually- the "worst" thing you can do to any forest is saw it down, as you cannot "replant" a forest, only trees.
(and planting a bunch of trees in the ground does NOT make a forest, btw)
The forest service has been selling out the people for decades - selling rain forest and other woods at bargain basement prices to Japanese and other companies who couldn't care less about the damage they were doing.
There's a difference between being pro-development and being a whore for development. Knee jerk "development good!" reactions fail to look at all available information that help us make wiser, more self-interested decisions.
blue- forest fire is a natural thing, would YOU like to pay to have all that charred lumber removed?
(I think logging in a national park is illegal anyway.)
Make it legal or whatever it takes. Leaving all that charred wood and trees is criminal in my mind. The value of the lumber would pay for itself. Just cannot let trees grow unchecked. We used to DO things in this country--now, way too much regulation.
Hopefully Secretary Vilsack has a back bone to stand up to the enviromentalists, unlike so many politicains that give in. There is nothing wrong with maintaining a sustainable renewable resource. Theres so many rules and regulations on harvesting that restrict the way timber plots are set up, its rediculous to even think that there going to harm anything.
(I think logging in a national park is illegal anyway.)
It is finally time to push back and re-create jobs in SE Alaska by harvesting a RENEWABLE resource!