Budget cuts, layoffs likely in 2010 for city of Fairbanks
by Rebecca George / rgeorge@newsminer.com
21 days ago | 945 views | 7 7 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print
FAIRBANKS — Fairbanks city Mayor Terry Strle has proposed a fiscal 2010 budget that includes six layoffs and the reduction of the discretionary bed tax contribution to local nonprofit organizations as a way to deal with a projected revenue drop of nearly $1 million next year.

“I’m certainly not the type of leader that would budget for things we don’t have,” Strle said Friday afternoon. “I looked at the numbers conservatively. We’re working with exactly what we have.”

It came as no surprise, Strle said, that projected 2010 revenues will be insufficient to maintain the city’s expenditures.

The city’s general fund revenue was a little more than $37 million in 2008. The 2010 revenues are estimated to be about $29 million, showing an $8.1 million decrease in revenue in just two years.

The decline led Strle to question the city’s ability to give out discretionary funds to local organizations.

“It’s unfortunate, but I can’t see funding the bed tax organizations if we’re having to eliminate positions here at the city,” she said.

Despite the six layoffs, Strle clarified in a letter to the City Council that she and her staff made an effort to avoid making any cuts among front line public services such as police, fire and public works.

City departments almost across the board will see budget cuts next year, but grants will help spare the building department, police and fire department from reductions.

City officials are relying on more than $1 million in grant money to maintain about nine positions in the police department and six positions in the engineering department.

Strle has proposed to hire one additional dispatcher to help alleviate overtime costs. She said that adding an additional employee would cost less than paying overtime to the current staff.

“I think the city has run a tight ship for a very long time, and it’s an unfortunate fact that we have to make something tighter that was already tight,” she said.

Strle’s budget is only a proposal. The final budget lies in the hands of the council.

Councilwoman Vivian Stiver said she was anticipating some cuts in this year’s budget but that she has concerns.

“I want to be sure we’re not seeing an overstated reaction to the failure of the sales tax measure” in the Oct. 6 election, Stiver said. “I believe there’s so much in that budget that we have to watch out for.”

Strle, in her letter to the council, stated her 2010 budget estimate was balanced, within the boundaries of the tax cap and was prepared using conservative revenue statements.
comments (7)
« TheBigDipper wrote on Saturday, Oct 31 at 10:26 PM »
Which 6 positions?

What happens when the grant money runs out on the 9 public safety spots and 6 engineering jobs? (How is it that 15 jobs add up to $1M? That's only $66K per job.)
report abuse
« BigMikeIsBack wrote on Saturday, Oct 31 at 08:38 PM »
use_your_head

Stiver did not support the sales tax. Strle did.

Stiver was predicting that Strle was going to make cuts as a backlash towards the voters turning down her sales tax proposal (i.e. cut back on the already dismal road maiintenance to get back at the folks).

Its too bad that Stiver did not run for Borough mayor. She would have destroyed Luke Hopkins.
report abuse
« use_your_head wrote on Saturday, Oct 31 at 03:01 PM »
The reason she's in this position is her leadership of the city council to overextending and overspending itself this year and years prior.

I have yet to see a budget Ms. Strle has put forward or supported that was conservative at its writing.

Nice plug for the sales tax Ms. Stiver. The citizens said no to your planned fleecing of the people. We caught on just in time and voted the measure down. Now, how about the city council and borough assemble learn to live with the taxes they already collect? The rest of us have to budget our finances responsibly and it is about time the borough/city started doing the same. Increasing taxes on the citizenry is the sleazy way out, write a budget that spends less money than you collect each year and watch what happens.
report abuse
« BigMikeIsBack wrote on Saturday, Oct 31 at 07:42 AM »
Mayor - maybe you should have thought about the budget when you were negoiating the sweetheart union contracts.

Think about this when you go to the polls on Tuesday!
report abuse
« Fathermoose wrote on Saturday, Oct 31 at 07:27 AM »
Whew, thank goodness Fairbanks didn't pass a sales tax! Golly, then they might not have been placed in the position of having to make tough budget decisions. Besides, once the city council is through with the proposed budget they'll be able to jack up the property taxes to pay for pet projects, causes, or free city services to non-taxpaying citizens. The only person smiling in the grave is Karl Marx.
report abuse
« Larmex wrote on Saturday, Oct 31 at 06:17 AM »
Its about time, now when will they pay their bill to the state retirement system?
report abuse
« Larmex wrote on Saturday, Oct 31 at 06:16 AM »
Its about time, now when are they going to pay their bill to the state retirement system?
report abuse