‘Frozen Gore’ sculpture returns in Fairbanks to fuel climate change debate
by Jeff Richardson / jrichardson@newsminer.com
8 months ago | 23440 views | 127 127 comments | 152 152 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Craig Compeau speaks to a small crowd during the unveiling of an Al Gore ice sculpture Tuesday morning, January 5, 2010 at Thrifty Liquor on the corner of Cushman Street and Airport Way. This is the second year local businessmen Compeau and Rudy Gavora have had an Al Gore sculpture displayed at the location, with this year s creation being commissioned to sculptor Steve Dean. Eric Engman/News-Miner
Craig Compeau speaks to a small crowd during the unveiling of an Al Gore ice sculpture Tuesday morning, January 5, 2010 at Thrifty Liquor on the corner of Cushman Street and Airport Way. This is the second year local businessmen Compeau and Rudy Gavora have had an Al Gore sculpture displayed at the location, with this year's creation being commissioned to sculptor Steve Dean. Eric Engman/News-Miner
slideshow
Craig Compeau unveiled an ice sculpture of Al Gore on Tuesday at the corner of Airport Way and Thrifty Liquor. The sculpture features "smoke" coming from Gore s mouth - exhaust from a truck. Photo courtesy of Craig Compeau
Craig Compeau unveiled an ice sculpture of Al Gore on Tuesday at the corner of Airport Way and Thrifty Liquor. The sculpture features "smoke" coming from Gore's mouth - exhaust from a truck. Photo courtesy of Craig Compeau
slideshow
FAIRBANKS - In what might become an annual tradition, an ice sculpture of former Vice President Al Gore has taken its place in front of Thrifty Liquor along Airport Way.

The two-ton “Frozen Gore” sculpture isn’t exactly a tribute. It’s a tongue-in-cheek critique of Gore’s vocal belief in man-made climate change, complete with hot air pouring out of his mouth.

Local businessmen Craig Compeau and Rudy Gavora contracted the piece from award-winning sculptor Steve Dean and say they’ll keep erecting one each winter until Gore accepts an invitation to discuss the global warming issue in Fairbanks.

“We do want to invite debate,” Compeau said. “We don’t agree with his theories — we’re suspicious of the financial motivation behind them.”

This year’s version includes special effects, thanks to a system that pipes the exhaust from a Ford F-350 out of Gore’s open mouth. Compeau will fire up the truck periodically this winter to create the “hot air” effect.

With temperatures in the single digits, about 10 people laughed as smoke poured out of the sculpture as it was unveiled Tuesday morning. An excerpt of a recent Gore speech on climate change played over a loudspeaker.

Compeau said the sculpture is inspiring a contest, in which the winner will receive winter gear and an Al Gore bobblehead doll.

He’s asking people to guess how long an F-350 would need to run to match the emissions of a Lear jet flight from Gore’s home in Tennessee to Copenhagen, the site of a recent international climate change summit.

In an e-mail, a Gore spokeswoman said the former vice president doesn’t own a Lear jet and flew to and from Copenhagen aboard commercial flights.

Compeau said he’ll change the wording so his Web site doesn’t claim Gore took a private jet but said the contest will remain the same. He said Gore has been guilty of hypocrisy in the past on the climate change issue.

“I know he’s gone out of his way to be seen flying commercial, but in the past, he’s flown on a Lear jet,” he said.

Last year’s inaugural Gore ice sculpture got national attention, including mentions on The Drudge Report, CNN, Fox News and MSNBC. Compeau said his Web site, which included photos and information about the sculpture and contest, attracted 1.7 million visitors.

Compeau said he was swamped with feedback, including hundreds, if not thousands, of e-mails. He said only a few were negative and that most people found the sculpture entertaining.

Compeau said he’s not denying that human activities might play a role in global warming but he’s skeptical of political solutions that Gore and others are advocating. He said huge sums of government money are unlikely to solve the problem.

“Before we start carbon taxing … let’s try and educate ourselves,” he said.

Climate change scientists say Alaska has warmed by 3 degrees Fahrenheit during the past

50 years. The average temperature for 2009 was 27.8 degrees in Fairbanks, about one degree warmer than normal, said Rick Thoman, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service.

Last winter, however, was unusually cold in Fairbanks. Temperatures in the winter months of

2008-09 were about 4 degrees below normal, according to National Weather Service figures.

A video of the sculpture and contest entry forms are available at www.frozengore.com.

Contact staff writer Jeff Richardson at 459-7518.
comments (127)
« grandpa99701 wrote on Friday, Mar 19 at 11:44 AM »
When asked if you are a Democrat or pub, all you have to answer is..."I'm a liar". The everyone will know you are a PUB!!

Have a wonderful day...not too much bagging now...running out of bandages in ALASKA!!!

report abuse
« grandpa99701 wrote on Friday, Mar 19 at 11:38 AM »
PS...this has been the warmest winter ever!!! Ask anyone that is a person of "TRUTH"!!! WARMEST WINTER EVVVVVEEEERRRRR!!!!!!

report abuse
« grandpa99701 wrote on Friday, Mar 19 at 11:36 AM »
This winter has been extremely warm. The block of ice at the liquor store is unrecognizable. If you didn't tell everyone it was Al Gore, no one would know! Fairbanks is among the top 10 cities that will boom, because of the climate change. Scientist have told us that there will be no summer ice cap within a few years. All naysayers are just teabaggers that have no idea what politics is all about. So sad, to be so ignorant!! At least we can tell who they are, they have huge bandages on their chins from all the TEABAGGING!!
report abuse
« LadronesMentira wrote on Monday, Jan 11 at 03:57 AM »
Well, CKN, we've been snowed in for a few days and I don't watch TV.

http://www.dp.ru/?ArticleID=357ff34d-fc03-4a0e-88d4-768ab16d3b2c&readcomment=1&orderBy=up&page=1#comment

Russia, too. : )

Airport security is no different than it ever was, regardless of what they're telling you.

Stay Warm! Say hi to my family in Fairbanks, will be home soon. : )
report abuse
« ckn wrote on Sunday, Jan 10 at 01:38 PM »
Well, well Mr. or Miss or Mrs. LadronesMentira. You're just quite the busy little beaver, aren't you?

Someone might want to google "ladronesmentira" and "al gore" and see how far reaching this and similar posts are.

I'm particularly impressed that you've been able to post to the Buenos Aires Herald and the lil' ole News-Miner in the same day, with the same message. How's the weather down there in Argentina? Any problems with airport security? We can't wait to see you back here in lil' ole Fairbanks.

report abuse
« LadronesMentira wrote on Sunday, Jan 10 at 06:20 AM »


http://globalwarmthis.blogspot.com/

So "chicken little" Al Gore has warned us of our upcoming doom from man-made Global Warming. We are led to believe we will all soon fall off the edge of the earth into the pits of Hell if we don't start using electric lawnmowers, and stop using those pesky road flares they're claiming puts rocket fuel into our water aquifers and consequently into our own bloodstreams. I am not a scientist, nor am I a climatologist. I'm just a simple person leading a simple life. I am not, however, a follower blinded by propaganda, status, greed or deception, and that is precisely what this Global Warming concept has been generated by.

As of this writing, this Winter, there are record snowfalls and record shattering frigid temperatures globally from China, W. Korea, Seoul, The United Kingdom, Texas, Iowa, Massachusetts, British Columbia, Scotland, to Florida, and our "experts" have gone underground because apparently Hell is freezing over. And it appears to me that we have been duped by possibly one of the greatest hoaxes of all time, leaving the believers scratching their heads scrambling to find rationale where there is none.

I like Weatherman David's take on it here, and agree that if we don't laugh at this catastrophic deception, a lot of people might get awfully mad and lose an awful lot of money on this snake-oil concoction. You can fool some of the people some of the time, Al, but you can't fool Mother Nature.

Hats off to Weatherman David, and thanks, Mother Nature, for hitting the mule between the eyes with a two-by-four this Winter 2010.
report abuse
« claudius5545 wrote on Friday, Jan 08 at 09:44 PM »
I can respect Scotsman's belief that there is insufficient evidence for certainty. Unfortunately, sufficient evidence would require waiting and observing as catastrophic feedback loops in the climate went far beyond any hope of amelioration. A similar situation applied in the case of CFCs, and the decision was made to address the problem before it was beyond control. Now, to refute the belief that nothing was wrong involves proving a negative. We no longer have the severe and deteriorating reduction of ozone to test the reality of the projections. I suppose we could relax all the world restrictions on CFCs, renew DuPont's patents and allow them to score billions in profits while the increased UV instigates several million cases of skin cancer. Somehow, that just doesn't seem like a truly sensible course of action, though.
report abuse
« Scotsman wrote on Friday, Jan 08 at 06:48 PM »
Correct that mis-speak to read, "Just as there is insufficient scientific evidence supporting the conclusion that ozone depletion was man-made or that it affected climate change, there is insufficient scientific evidence supporting a conclusion that, first, the climate is warming, and second, that if indeed it is, then the warming is man-induced."

There may be evidence for speculation or hypotheses, but it is clear from the continuing debate among respected scientists that there is not sufficient evidence to prove either of the hypotheses.

report abuse
« claudius5545 wrote on Friday, Jan 08 at 01:44 PM »
Scotsman said, "Just as there is no scientific evidence supporting the speculation that ozone depletion was man-made or that it affected climate change"

Where were you in the 70s and 80s as this was being addressed? Did you have a bunker where you were going to wait out the Soviet invasion, led by the one-world government conspiracy who were fluoridating the drinking water to weaken your mind?

For you and Invictus: http://zapatopi.net/afdb/

"An Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanie (AFDB) is a type of headwear that can shield your brain from most electromagnetic psychotronic mind control carriers. AFDBs are inexpensive (even free if you don't mind scrounging for thrown-out aluminium foil) and can be constructed by anyone with at least the dexterity of a chimp (maybe bonobo). This cheap and unobtrusive form of mind control protection offers real security to the masses. Not only do they protect against incoming signals, but they also block most forms of brain scanning and mind reading, keeping the secrets in your head truly secret. AFDBs are safe and operate automatically. All you do is make it and wear it and you're good to go! Plus, AFDBs are stylish and comfortable.

What are you waiting for? Make one today!"
report abuse
« EP wrote on Friday, Jan 08 at 12:41 PM »
Scotsman, where do you get your information? Don't tell us from college dropouts/substance abusers like Rush Limbaugh and Glen Beck.

Here is a reliable source, a report from 300 leading scientists with the World Meteorological Orgranization, among others (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,

National Aeronautics and Space Administration,

United Nations Environment Programme,

European Commission)

http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/csd/assessments/2006/

[b]Ozone, Ultraviolet Radiation, and Other Related Changes to Date[/b]

The previous Assessment noted that stratospheric ozone depletion was expected to begin to reverse within the next decade or so. Now we ask: Are there any signs of this beginning? Have other factors influenced the behavior of ozone

during this period? Has surface UV radiation responded as anticipated?

[i]• Our basic understanding that anthropogenic ozone-depleting substances have been the principal cause of the ozone depletion over the past few decades has been strengthened. During the recent period of near-constant abundances of ozone-depleting gases, variations in meteorology have been particularly important in influencing

the behavior of ozone over much of the polar and extrapolar (60°S-60°N) regions.[/i]
report abuse
« Scotsman wrote on Friday, Jan 08 at 11:57 AM »
Just as there is no scientific evidence supporting the speculation that ozone depletion was man-made or that it affected climate change, there is no scientific evidence supporting a conclusion that, first, the climate is warming, and second, that if indeed it is, then the warming is man-induced.

Does it come as any surprise that any corporation with the wherewithal to patent and produce CFCs would, when the government banned CFCs, also have the wherewithal to develop and produce the substitutes to replace them, in response to demand??
report abuse
« anonymous wrote on Friday, Jan 08 at 10:56 AM »
Scotsman said: "Sounds similar to another crisis attributed to man a number of years ago. That was the hole-in-the ozone about which we heard nothing more after massive, taxpayer-funded grants were cut off. What happened to the drastic climate change and biosphere death that the "models" predicted back then?"

Ummm, well. Yes, scientists found that the ozone hole was increasing in size, potentially resulting in increased exposure to UV radiation. Part of the cause was linked to CFCs and the like. So after a decade or so of haggling, CFC use was cut back. Lo! Some 15 to 20 years later the ozone in the southern hemisphere is shrinking.

Same post, but a couple of typos cleaned up.

[Denialist Answer: Oh, that's natural variation and just a coincidence--just a bunch of greedy overpaid scientists trying to make money; just ask Rush. Oh, and did you know that dinosaurs walked the streets of Wasilla, just 6000 years ago...?]

Although there has been speculation that ozone depletion could be linked to climate change, there has been no scientific evidence of that.
report abuse
« joeslankas wrote on Friday, Jan 08 at 10:48 AM »
invictus:

You lost this debate man. Suck it up and admit it. You're spouting nonsensical crap, and have no valid answers for any of the questions posed to you. You have no credible sources, and are dead set on disproving something with a ton of scientific validity supporting it.

It's okay man. It happens. But if you look hard enough online, I bet you can find instructions for a tinfoil hat.

report abuse
« EP wrote on Friday, Jan 08 at 10:40 AM »
Scotsman said: "Sounds similar to another crisis attributed to man a number of years ago. That was the hole-in-the ozone about which we heard nothing more after massive, taxpayer-funded grants were cut off. What happened to the drastic climate change and biosphere death that the "models" predicted back then?"

Ummm, well. Yes, scientists found that the ozone hole was increasing in size, potentially resulting in increased exposure to UV radiation. Part of the cause was linked to CFCs and the like. So after a decade or so of haggling, CFC us was cut back. Lo! Some 15 to 20 years later the ozone in the southern hemisphere is shrinking.

[Denialist Answer: Oh, that's natural variation and just a coincidence--just a bunch of greed overpaid scientists trying to make money; just ask Rush. Oh, and did you know that dinosaurs walked the streets of Wasilla, just 6000 years ago...?]

Although there has been speculation that ozone depletion could be linked to climate change, there has been no scientific evidence of that.
report abuse
« claudius5545 wrote on Friday, Jan 08 at 10:37 AM »
Scotsman - The threat from widespread use of CFCs was and is very real. CFC use was drastically reduced world-wide, but there are still stockpiles of them being used up, there are significant quantities still in the atmosphere, the ozone is still depleted, and it will take decades or longer for the ozone layer to replenish itself. If the world HADN'T managed to achieve those reductions, the situation now would be drastically worse.

Interesting to note that at the height of discussion over the issue, DuPont (holder of patents for very profitable CFCs) was broadcasting denials, bogus "facts", and doing everything in their power to prevent any action. Once the CFCs were banned, suddenly they were all in favor, being the good, corporate citizens all over the media, like Phillip Morris and tobacco. Guess who now owns most of the patents for the replacements for CFCs.
report abuse
« claudius5545 wrote on Friday, Jan 08 at 10:29 AM »
Invictus - You just keep trotting out the same discredited extremist quotes, and refusing to accept any source as valid that doesn't agree with them. OK. Several people have presented actual facts, with verification from legitimate sources, so the validity of your position becomes very clear to all. I'm not going to play whack-a-mole with you.
report abuse
« Scotsman wrote on Friday, Jan 08 at 10:00 AM »
Regarding Invictus, Jan 8, 9:03AM: "The effect of the grotesque alarmism over climate change is the grotesque reaction led by unscrupulous charlatans like Al Gore and the corrupt scientists like James Hansen and Michael Mann (et al). They've found the perfect venue to scare people and nations into dramatic and expensive contortions ---"

Sounds similar to another crisis attributed to man a number of years ago. That was the hole-in-the ozone about which we heard nothing more after massive, taxpayer-funded grants were cut off. What happened to the drastic climate change and biosphere death that the "models" predicted back then?
report abuse
« joeslankas wrote on Friday, Jan 08 at 09:47 AM »
'money, power, and greed.'

What money and power, to who? Cite specific examples of 'greedy' people capitalizing on the concept of global warming for financial gain.

You're 0 for 5 bud. Come on...impress me.
report abuse
« EP wrote on Friday, Jan 08 at 09:40 AM »
Lindzen also defended big tobacco, and tried to debunk the nicotine-cancer link.

There are some big name scientists who do disclaim anthropogenic climate change--including a couple of very notable scientists at UAF, Lindzen, and the likes of William Gray, a retired climate researcher in the lower 48. Nevertheless, a recent survey indicated that 97% of climatologists do believe that humans are a factor in climate change: http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/americas/01/19/eco.globalwarmingsurvey/index.html

Now now, you denialists will get all foamy at the mouth and vindictive in your rhetoric. So here's a hanky to wipe that off your face--it's quite unbecoming and detracts from the discussion.

report abuse
« EP wrote on Friday, Jan 08 at 09:12 AM »
Invictus, do you have a real job? You are a real piece of work. What's with the name anyway? Do you feel like you are persecuted or something? Do you have a degree in science, let alone have you taken or passed a science class?

By all means, let us know.
report abuse
Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.