Judge refuses to end Stevens trial

Originally published Wednesday, October 8, 2008 at 2:25 p.m.
Updated Wednesday, October 8, 2008 at 2:55 p.m.

WASHINGTON — A federal judge on Wednesday refused another defense request to declare a mistrial in the corruption case against Sen. Ted Stevens, instead deciding he would tell jurors to ignore disputed portions of the government’s evidence.

The ruling came after Stevens’ attorneys accused prosecutors of improperly withholding information that was favorable to Stevens and by using business records they knew were faulty to try to sway the jury. The defense has filed motions four times in three weeks asking U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan to either dismiss the case or declare a mistrial.

“This is a criminal case with a career on the line here,” defense attorney Robert Carey argued at a hearing. “The government has responsibilities. Time and time again, they have not lived up to them. Enough is enough.”

Stevens, 84, is accused of lying on Senate forms to conceal more than $250,000 in renovations on his cabin and other gifts from Bill Allen, the former chief of a giant oil pipeline company, VECO Corp.

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell and Sen. Daniel Inouye, D-Hawaii, could be among the first witnesses to testify Thursday for the defense after the prosecution is expected to formally rests its case.

Prosecutors had introduced accounting records showing that a VECO worker logged hundreds of hours on the cabin project. But according to his own grand jury testimony, he was in Oregon much of that time — something the defense only learned about this week.

Though he ultimately kept the trial on track, Sullivan told prosecutors he was disturbed by the accusations and sternly demanded an explanation.

“Why is it so hard to admit that the government knew those weren’t truthful records?” he asked prosecutor Nicholas Marsh. “All along the government knew that was a lie.”

Marsh argued that the government never portrayed the business records as airtight.

“We looked at this in a different light,” he said.

“It was a very dim light, counsel,” the judge responded. “A very dim light.”

Along with his decision to strike parts of the business records, Sullivan said he would instruct the jury on Thursday to ignore evidence and Allen’s testimony about what prosecutors called a sweetheart car swap: a 1964 Ford Mustang and $5,000 from Stevens for a new $44,000 Land Rover purchased by Allen.

Defense attorneys had sought to show on cross-examination of Allen that the Land Rover was worth far less, only to have prosecutors surprise them by producing a check the witness used to pay for the vehicle. The judge found the check should have been shared earlier.

Earlier Wednesday, prosecutors called an FBI agent as their last witness to introduce e-mails about the home improvements.

In e-mails from 2000 and 2001, a neighbor gave Stevens regular progress reports on a project that turned a modest backwoods A-frame into a two-story home with a new roof, hardwood floors, wraparound decks, a sauna and a garage.

“We look forward to seeing the house,” Stevens wrote back, referring to his wife, Catherine. “I guess we can’t call it a chalet anymore.”

The neighbor, Bob Persons, credited a VECO employee with doing the bulk of the work, and the senator occasionally asked for invoices.

“Don’t forget, we need a bill,” he e-mailed Allen at one point.

Prosecutors also introduced financial disclosure forms from the same period that required Stevens to report gifts to himself or immediate family. The senator listed items like a gold coin worth $1,100 and a sled dog valued at $250 but didn’t mention VECO or the cabin project.

Allen, who’s cooperating under a plea deal, testified that he couldn’t bring himself to charge his close friend for the costs, and that the senator never paid him. The jury heard secretly recorded phone conversations in which the pair discussed how to fend off the FBI.

Stevens, who spends more time at his home in Washington than in Alaska, says he paid little attention to the project that his wife oversaw. He says he assumed the $160,000 they paid for the project covered everything.

The corruption investigation has rattled Alaska politics, turning prominent state lawmakers into convicted felons and making Stevens vulnerable to a Democratic challenge for his Senate seat in the Nov. 4 election.

Community Discussion

Newsminer.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full user's agreement.

  1. Musher
    10/8/2008, 5 p.m.
    Suggest removal

    "WASHINGTON — A federal judge on Wednesday refused another defense request to declare a mistrial in the corruption case against Sen. Ted Stevens, instead deciding he would tell jurors to ignore disputed portions of the government’s evidence."
    “Why is it so hard to admit that the government knew those weren’t truthful records?” he asked prosecutor Nicholas Marsh. “All along the government knew that was a lie.”

    Smile Ted, jurors, love you!

  2. RustyShackleford
    10/8/2008, 5:33 p.m.
    Suggest removal

    I hope Alaskans are paying attention - this shocking abuse of justice can happen to anyone if it can happen to Ted. "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere!"

    This trial is out of control - Bundy's hand signals to Bill Allen, and now the prosecution introducing evidence they know to be false - EVIDENCE THEY KNOW TO BE FALSE. Just think if Ted has just rolled over - but he knows he did nothing wrong and didn't make it through WWII, and 40 years of the Senate by rolling over - no he made it by FIGHTING for Alaska and what he believes in.

    I just wish the judge had the gumption to shut this thing down - how much more can he put up with before he throws this thing where it belongs - in history's trash pile.

  3. nr4ever
    10/8/2008, 8:13 p.m.
    Suggest removal

    LOL. He's running scared.

  4. amgray19
    10/8/2008, 10:41 p.m.
    Suggest removal

    Armchair experts know soooo much more than the people actually involved. I love it!

  5. sourdoughdiablo
    10/8/2008, 11:13 p.m.
    Suggest removal

    Yeah right ignore the testimony, that always works. The feds dug and dug, and all they can come up with is an admitted briber claiming that his company did work without compensation from Senator Stevens, a reach indeed.
    It is my belief that Allen knew he was in trouble and set our Senator up by purposely withholding bills from him, or his wife. And speaking of Mrs. Stevens, she must feel awful to be drug into this whole mess due to a set up.
    I for one hope that the jury sees how the feds have done everything short of lying, which they probably have done, to persecute this man just and bring him down for doing nothing wrong.
    It's written in black and white people: "Don't forget, we need a bill."
    Free Ted, Re-elect Ted, Respect Ted

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Also inside
Today's news / Photos / Local / Alaska / Sports / Opinion
Features
Sundays / Health / Food / Outdoors / Latitude 65 / Youth / Business
newsminer.com
Archives / About / Feedback / Privacy Policy / User Agreement / Jobs / Contact / Feeds / Twitter / YouTube / Bookstore
Submit
Letters to the Editor / Applause / Events / Obituaries