Alaska's Sen. Stevens denies rift with Palin, lays out energy relief plan
Published Wednesday, July 2, 2008
ANCHORAGE — U.S. Sen. Ted Stevens sought to minimize reports of friction between him and Gov. Sarah Palin as she joined him Wednesday at a press conference laying out Stevens’ proposals for relief from high energy prices.
“We’re each free to make comments about what the other does and every once in while she’ll say I’m stupid,” said the 84-year-old Stevens, drawing laughter. “She may be right.”
Palin quickly jumped in to say she had never called the longest serving Republican in Senate history “stupid.” There has been a great difference, she said, between perception and reality when it comes to their relationship.
“I have great respect for the senator,” she said. “He needs to be heard across America. His voice, his experience, his passion needs to be heard across America so Alaska can contribute more.”
Palin was directly responsible for bouncing one long-term Republican from office, former U.S. Sen. and Gov. Frank Murkowski, defeating him in the 2006 GOP primary. Her public comments about Stevens gave the impression she might have been trying to oust another.
Palin made openness in politics a cornerstone of her campaign and took aim at congressional earmarks, or direct appropriations, that send money to states outside bureaucratic review. Stevens as a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee has masterfully directed billions to Alaska and makes no apology for it, citing the state’s dearth of infrastructure.
Palin in September called on Stevens to explain why the FBI is investigating the remodel of his home in Girdwood and his ties to former VECO Corp. CEO Bill Allen, who has pleaded guilty to bribing Alaska state legislators.
The FBI and the IRS in July 2007 searched Stevens’ home in Girdwood, a ski resort community that makes up Anchorage’s southern edge. Allen in trials last year testified he sent company employees to work on the remodel in 2000.
Stevens has said he paid all the bills presented to him, and that the investigation should work to its conclusion without any appearance that he attempted to influence the outcome with comments.
Stevens on Wednesday insisted he was not offended by any of the governor’s remarks. They were part of Alaska’s period of need, he said, and with the oil revenue flowing in, there probably will be fewer earmarks.
As for the investigation, “I do think the governor had every right to say what she did. I didn’t entertain any umbrage about it. I never talked to her about it at all. I wish I had her freedom to speak about it, but I don’t. It’s there, it’s continuing and that’s all there is to it.”
On energy plans, Stevens laid out short- and long-term ideas. He said he backed Palin’s idea of cash relief for Alaskans from the state’s swelling coffers.
“We need to return some of that surplus money to the people who are hurting,” he said.
On the federal level, he’s pushing legislation to restrict energy futures speculation that he said has driven up costs.
Long-term, Stevens called for opening the coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to exploration and development, federal revenue from the region directed toward alternative and renewable energy that could someday replace petroleum.
Stevens faces a challenge in the August primary from former state lawmaker Dave Cuddy and four other Republicans.
His likely Democratic opponent in November is Anchorage Mayor Mark Begich, whose own energy plan calls opening ANWR and establishing a national and state target of generating at least 25 percent of domestic electricity from renewable resources by 2025.
Begich also called for setting a goal of reducing energy consumption by 25 percent by 2018 through energy efficiency.
Digg
delicious
Mixx
Reddit
Stumble It!
Community Discussion
Newsminer.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full user's agreement.
I am skeptical about Mayor Begich's long term national plans of setting goals and targets on renewable energy. Drilling ANWR is not a long term plan either. That plan is merely a stop gap and simply brings known reserves online. It needs to be done for short term needs.
A long term plan lays out the necessary steps in achieving goals and targets. For example: Nationally close 50% of the fossil fuel electric power plants and replace them with Nuclear or renewable power plants like wind, solar, or hydro by the time we are projected to have used 50% of our current reserves at current consumption levels. Then our reserves will double and upon reaching 50% of that amount, the remaining fossil fueled plants must be closed. Leaving 25% plus any new reserves discovered to continue to fuel legacy equipment and vehicles. Transportation fuel and conversion is another issue that needs a complimentary plan.
For in state conversion, we need to look at converting to coal and natural gas state wide for heating and electricity until reliable renewable sources are proven effective. We cannot afford to burn fuel oil to generate electricity. Though GVEA says their North pole plant is their most cost effective, our fuel surcharges disagree.
That my friends is a plan based on reality. Arbitrarily setting goals and targets does not make it happen.
Old Geezer you, almost older than dirt
but still has that cloud to bait! bring
that piggy home!
Post a comment
Commenting requires registration.