Higher temperatures are lengthening Alaska's growing season
by Molly Rettig / mrettig@newsminer.com
Aug 01, 2010 | 6149 views | 38 38 comments | 15 15 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Ed Sarten of Ruby, left, points out the start of an ear of corn to Patrick Smith of Minto, second from left, as rows of corn are grown in the lower Experiment Farm fields at the University of Alaska Fairbanks Saturday morning, July 31, 2010. The pair was on a tour of the farm with Heidi Rader, tribes extension educator for the university s Cooperative Extension Service, third from left, and Edward Alexander of Fort Yukon, right, as part of a sustainable agriculture  outreach program funded with a Western Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education grant. / Eric Engman/News-Miner
view image
FAIRBANKS — One hundred years ago, the growing season in Fairbanks was less than three months long. Last year, some local gardeners were still harvesting broccoli and cabbage in mid-September.

Fairbanks is 2.5 degrees Fahrenheit hotter and 11 percent drier than it was in the early 20th century, according to data gathered by the Alaska Climate Research Center. (The growing season is marked by the last frost in spring and the first frost in fall.) These changes have stretched the growing season from 85 to 123 days in the past century. And while warming might produce more potatoes and pumpkins in cold-climate regions, it could eradicate tree populations.

“Every change in climate will bring positive things and negative things,” said Gerd Wendler, director of the research center at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Agriculture is one beneficiary of a warmer climate in Fairbanks. But before you start planting olives, consider the discrepancy among growing seasons in the just past five years. In 2006, the last hard freeze struck June 6. Last spring, the final frost came May 15, according to data from the National Weather Service.

How long is it, really?

Agriculture depends not just on climate but on weather, a short-term measure of conditions, and seasonal anomalies like early frosts and heavy rain.

“The thing about agriculture is we can have really high temperatures or long seasons, but if you have a hard frost in the middle of August that wipes out everything, you can have another month that’s really good but you can’t take advantage of it because the crops are dead,” said Meriam Karlsson, professor of horticulture at UAF who has observed 20 years of growing seasons in Fairbanks.

Karlsson said the growing season has increased in the past couple of decades from 100 to about 105 days. Though summers typically contain more frost-free days, it’s still risky to plant before June.

Michelle Hebert, horticulture specialist at the Cooperative Extension Service, said last summer was the longest growing season in the 37 years she has gardened in the north.

“Within the last few years, especially last summer, I had, in my garden, 120 days,” she said. “We just had that Indian summer that went on forever.”

Longer seasons allow crops like potatoes to flourish and for second harvests of crops like broccoli and cabbage. They have also allowed the Fairbanks Experiment Farm to test certain varieties of corn, which need at least 100 days to grow, said Karllson.

Balance of warming

In the past 100 years, temperatures climbed the most in winter but rose in every season except fall. Yet every season has been touched by the consequences, as living conditions improve for insects, moisture content changes and freeze-thaw cycles are altered.

The single month with the biggest change was April, which warmed by more than 5 degrees Fahrenheit. That’s partly because April is when snow melts, which compounds warming, Wendler said.

“Snow reflects lots of sunlight so when the snow is gone, more solar radiation is absorbed at the surface. The higher surface temperature causes greater warming of the soil,” he said.

This helps soils thaw faster, a perk for gardening.

“With earlier snowmelt, the field’s going to dry up faster, the soil warms up faster and you can plant earlier,” Karlsson said.

Other effects

Another side effect of warming is drying, because warm air can carry more moisture than cold air. Drying has been less kind to agriculture and forestry, said Glenn Juday, professor of forest ecology at UAF.

“Warm air sucks more out of the plant,” he said, “so the supply of moisture available to trees is reduced.”

Precipitation has dropped 11 percent since 1916. Also, as spring arrives earlier and fall comes later, trees have less time to absorb moisture from the snowpack. As trees in the Interior run out of water, they become more susceptible to disease, he said.

Meanwhile, lower winter temperatures and fewer sustained freezes have allowed insects to over-winter here, causing outbreaks of aspen leaf-miners, spruce budworms and birch leaf scorch. In turn, dry, diseased trees are prime fuel for forest fires.

“Each species is being hit with something. There’s no winner in the boreal forest,” he said.

With agriculture, however, it’s easier to combat drying.

“The whole paradigm is different,” Juday said. “If there’s no water, we irrigate. If the soil’s not fertile, we fertilize it. If the soil’s too acidic, we lime it.”

The future

This season began with a warm, dry spring but evolved into a cool, wet July.

While the recent rain has helped this year’s crops, it’s not enough to save the forests, Juday said. If warming trends continue, he anticipates most native trees species in the Interior will be eliminated within the next few decades, replaced by more temperate imports from farther south.

“We’ve just gone through one of the two or three driest, hottest periods in the last century,” he said. “The cumulative drying we’ve had has just crisped things to the level that these higher precipitations are just not enough.”

While warming is provoking some negative changes in Alaska, it is not without positive impact. Agriculture could be one of these bright spots.

“People are already harvesting red tomatoes,” said Hebert. “The gardens overall across Fairbanks are unbelievable, healthy and thriving, and I think it’s all the moisture we’re having now.”

Contact staff writer Molly Rettig at 459-7590.
Comments
(38)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
1AhHa
|
August 02, 2010
By the way, the UAF scientists tho support the Global warming scam where honest enough to point out the local climate data is flawed be they thermometer has been moved several times, heat islands grown to the point that heat from buildings warm the air, and local winter temperatures are relative to altitude.

Thus I remain thankful for global warming and climate change which drove evolution leading to mankind.

Regretfully, Acorns and Democrats have something in common..... yfvrt

ckn
|
August 02, 2010
I had this feeling Invictus and others would grow silent on this one. It's funny how, when you start asking very basic science questions, the thread dies down. Says a lot, in my mind.
FreeLiberTea
|
August 02, 2010
I hope this 2.5 degree change stretches the Tanana Valley State Fair season to 123 days!

End The Fed
myAlaska
|
August 02, 2010
Duh! That is why it's called Global Warming. Craig Compeaus eat that. And for useless guy that is what it's called. Where did most of you get your education from a Kentucky cereal box? That is why they call it science. Repukes belive what they want when it's to their liking and the others do the same but for some reason Republicans appear to be so much more constipated about any issue when it comes to topics like this one. Regardless whether it's caused by man or not it is happening on this Earthly globe sooooo....it's GLOBAL WARMING stick that where your sun doesn't shine nay sayers your temps are climbing already I can just hear you whining now.
LostAlaskan99712
|
August 02, 2010
Those are called "temperature inversions", 1LaLa.

1AhHa
|
August 02, 2010
For you global warming fans.

---

The local climate data is useless! And the official [1] text says why. I have listed 2 or the main reasons ... there are others..

1) They moved the thermometer from a very cold location to a warmer location.

2) The winter temperatures in Fairbanks are related to elevation.

3) Heat Island from urban development warms the air -- enough to be measured.

One time I measured a 2 F difference between the up wind side of the (Bently Mall) shopping center and the down wind side and -30F.

It was clear the Mall was heating the local air! Now you know where and what your money is really heating -- the air around your house!

Also, elevation has a pronounced effect.

I put $5 digital thermometer on my car antenna and watched it change as I drove up and down the local hill to and from town.

In the winter the temp varied as much as 30 F. Most of the time it varied 20 F from the cold flat low lands to the warmer hills.

I had an email friend who lived up on top of the hill north of Gold Stream who claimed it never got below 20 most of the time when it was -40 or lower in Fairbanks.

----

[1] this is worth keeping in your archive!

http://climate.gi.alaska.edu/history/Interior/Fairbanks.html#Fairbanks

--\jlceg
ArcticWriter
|
August 02, 2010
triproad and invictus:

Thank you for proving my point.

Nowhere in my post did I give an opinion of my interpretation of the facts, but you both jumped to the conclusion that I had.

I merely said that the FACTS are that the growing season in Fairbanks has lengthened by nearly a month and the number of -40 degree days per winter has shortened. I said that an interpretation of the fact was open to debate. And that many citizens lack critical thinking skills and concoct all sorts of wild ideas. That is ALL I said. The rest you just ran with.

noainc
|
August 01, 2010
100 years of temperature data is meaningless in the context of "climate change".

European populations expanded as a direct result of sufficient warming during the 1600s and 1700s to allow dependable agriculture to expand northwards.

Greenland was warmer when Scandinavian colonizers arrived and created permanent settlements. Cooling temperatures created an environment that they could not cope with and essentially killed off the Europeans, but made the land and surrounding seas favorable for eastward migrating Inuits, who make up the bulk of today’s population.

Even the most ardent believers in the "man created CO2 is scorching the earth" dogma cannot assign "blame man" to account for the loss of the Bering land bridge due to warming and rising seas.

Central planners who create artificial increases to energy costs for financial profits, political reasons and social control are a direct threat to everyone. This includes "scientists" who prostitute their fields of science for the benefit of grants with pre-determined outcomes.

Enjoy your gardens and summer weather and hope like heck that we will not soon face $10 a gallon fuel oil and gasoline, because that will be a man caused disaster.

TheAlaskaCurmudgeon
|
August 01, 2010
"Of course, no one pays attention to the fact that Fairbanks was several degrees warmer before the last major ice age."

Funny, all this time I had thought that Fairbanks wasn't founded until 1901.
ckn
|
August 01, 2010
« Invictus wrote on Sunday, Aug 01 at 03:05 PM »

miledr -- you've missed my other posts in which I've verified the near term cooling trend and the long term cooling trend."

===========================

You seem to have a lot of expertise in this chatroom. I wonder if you would help me understand some basic physics.

Consider the Earth's radiation budget. You've seen it in hundreds of books, and here's just one example:

http://rst.gsfc.nasa.gov/Sect16/earth_rad_budget_nasa_erbe_big.gif

Though the numbers can be disputed, let's just stick with them for now - the atmospheric system loses 6% of its energy budget in the form of LWR directly to outer space. That 6% is forever gone and will not contribute to warming the atmosphere.

So, let's say we chuck a couple additional CO2 molecules into the atmosphere, and one of these quantums of LWR that was otherwise headed straight for space collides with it. As explained to me, the molecule gets excited, and then returns to its stable state, re-emitting a quantum of LWR. What now becomes of that quantum? It "was" destined for outer space - what's going to happen to it now, and how will it affect the Earth's energy budget?

This has struck me as quite fundamental, and I see so much else in these chatrooms as being "noise." Where am I mistaken?
deepbreathnow
|
August 01, 2010
This article is full of liberal-biased FACTS!
Pearl=W
|
August 01, 2010
cc1 - this definitely does seem to be a very 'heavy bug' year, but then last year was an exceptionally 'low-bug' year, out my way at least. I think it has a lot to do with last summer's 'breeding season', and last winter's warmer conditions enabling greater numbers to over-winter, as well as very good breeding weather this summer.

And there do seem to be some species expanding their range northward, possibly because the warmer winters now allow them to over-winter, when they would have winter-killed in the past. Compton's Tortiseshell butterflys were not seen in the Fbk area prior to 2003 [1st sighting of 2-3 winter-killed butterflies in NP], but are now a common late summer sight. They are one of the butterflies that depend on hibernation over the winter for their breeding cycle to complete.
triproad
|
August 01, 2010
arcticwriter, you are a perfect example of your statement that there are many citizens without the critical thinking skills to understand or interpret the big picture. You just know that Al Gore is the man and you look for any information the will support your veiw piont. Very scientific.

"Global warming" is a religion, and a bad one at that.

mileder
|
August 01, 2010
inv- Well, you're right about one thing: I could well have missed some of your posts since I really can't hover over these comment pages all day. What I read was this (posted by you 9:52 am)

"....It is quite a simple thing to show that the global climate is warming with or without human influences. It has been doing so for at least 13,000 years ..."

which is clearly wrong. The post-ice age warming ended 9k years ago. There is noise on the signal, as you say, on a scale of about .25 degree C but a very general appraisal would be "more or less flat from 8k BP to 4k BP and trending downward for the next 4k years." Granted, you also said

"...during the last several thousand years, global climate has been remarkably stable with a few little blips like the Medieval Maxima and the Little Ica Age."

which is quite true although inconsistent with the first quote.

Invictus
|
August 01, 2010
ARcticwriter -- which do you think is the "scare tactic"?:

1. The Earth is getting so warm that half of animal species will go extinct, Arctic ice will disappear completely in our lifetimes, the oceans are dying, and we must spend trillions of dollars and dramatically reduce our quality of life for negligible yield; or

2. It's not an emergency, it's been happening for thousands of years, so let's adapt and promise each other that we will not build anymore cities at sea level.
Invictus
|
August 01, 2010
miledr -- you've missed my other posts in which I've verified the near term cooling trend and the long term cooling trend. I've frequently stated that Pleistocene to Holocene, the overall trend is cooling (entropy) and that warm interstadia are relatively brief and may be shortening; therefore, the only logical conclusion is that we should be very grateful for the current minor warming trend and if humans are marginally responsible for warding off global cooling, then our fortune is good. I've also frequently stated that in the future (~500? yrs from now), mankind will work very hard to artificially warm Earth's climate.

You will also have to admit that since the 8,200yr event, Earth's climate, measured in Greenland ice sheet core, has been warmer than current climate a number of times. The periodicity appears to be ~1,500yrs, implying that with or without anthro-input, it was getting warmer anyway.
ArcticWriter
|
August 01, 2010
PS: Who changed the "human test" into illegible letters??? Takes me 2-3 tries each time.

Come on, News-Miner! Fix this!
ArcticWriter
|
August 01, 2010
Sorry to burst the bubble of those who deny, but this is not up for debate. Facts are that the growing season in Fairbanks has lengthened by nearly a month and the number of -40 degree days per winter has shortened. These are FACTS. I can vouch personally for these facts, watching my winter gear languish in the closet and my garden keep producing until the beginning of October.

The interpretation of these facts may be open to debate. That is a different story.

There are still people who think the earth is flat and that the moon landing was fake. There are many citizens without the critical thinking skills to understand or interpret the big picture, and many others willing to fill those folks with a bunch of scare tactic dribble for their own advantage.
1AhHa
|
August 01, 2010
[« SetItStraight wrote on Sunday, Aug 01 at 09:00 AM »

1AhHa, sorry to burst your bubble, but climate change is settled science. It has been for well over a decade. The questions that are being researched by scientists today attempt to identify the percentage of global climate change is human-caused (most serious scientists agree that a vast majority of the changes are human-influenced), the aspects of human and natural life which will be impacted, and the rate at which changes will take place.

I'm not sure why some folks are so skeptical of volumes of scientific inquiry, but I guess people resisted the idea that the world was not flat too. [more] ..."

-- Rebuttal ..

« SaidSo wrote on Sunday, Aug 01 at 07:01 AM »

Ever little bit helps! 5% in 100 years is .05 day per year or 1.2 hour per year.

How may hours per day? Ans: .003287671

I bet cutting down a shade tree would do more good.

--- I don't know if SaidSo made a math error or not but the change is minuscule.

There is one thing we need to keep in mind: natural selection is an on going process. Those who fail to adapt are deselected from the planetary gene poll.

This is political issue [other wise known as a scam] to con the federal and state gov into more taxation to justify more jobs for government employees.

Perhaps you tell us how more taxation is going to alter the planetary climate, or better yet change the Earth's orbit or change the amount of dust between the Sun and Earth.

Earth will most likely continue to thaw out during this 14,000 year inter glacial warm spell.

Frankly, we need to spend more thanking mother nature for her gift of "warmness".

Here is why:

Do you have any idea what would happen to the Northern 2/3s of the United states if the climates flipped to freeze?

Hints. There would be no mobility obese people running round.

Do you think it would be anything different than what happened during the Little Ice age when about 1/3 to 1/2 of the population in the Northern hemisphere starved to death [and/or died from warfare related to the economic collapse]?

I suggest all you "(most serious scientists agree that a vast majority of the changes are human-influenced)" promoting this fraud look closely at the graph on the web page sighted below.

[maybe some one can copy and paste it?]

http://www.scotese.com/climate.htm

-----

And, by the way -- since this place started thawing out -- the oceans have risen 394' not inches or millimeters but FEET. Also, there was an enormous flood which went down the Matsu Valley.

An estimated 350 cubic MILES of WATER was released by a broken a ice(?) dam.

Now that is change I believe in!

--]

rcibk

Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.