Opponent Joe Miller critical of Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski’s debate schedule
by Chris Freiberg / cfreiberg@newsminer.com
Jul 15, 2010 | 2978 views | 17 17 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
FAIRBANKS — Senate candidate Joe Miller will attend three debates with Sen. Lisa Murkowski but is taking issue with the format and scheduling.

A statement released earlier this week by the Miller campaign called the debates “soft” forums that will not allow exchanges between the candidates and have little participation from the public.

“It’s sound bites,” Miller spokesman Randy DeSoto said. “(Murkowski) can say whatever she wants without any follow-up questions.”

DeSoto said that setup may benefit Miller as well but that the campaign would prefer a “free exchange” between the candidates, who are squaring off for the Republican nomination in the Aug. 24 primary.

Miller said he approached Murkowski during the July 8 Anchorage Republican Women’s luncheon at the home of former Gov. Bill Sheffield and proposed a schedule of four debates.

The next day, Murkowski issued a news release stating that because the Senate will be in session until Aug. 7, the first debate she will attend is the one scheduled for Aug. 10 and sponsored by the Greater Fairbanks Chamber of Commerce.

The other two debates are set for Aug. 11 before the Kenai/Soldotna Chamber of Commerce and Aug. 18 by Anchorage-based KAKM television.

“I spoke with two female staffers in attendance, and they relayed to me that after the event, as they were leaving to go to another meeting, our opponent was waiting outside the house and a discussion took place,” said Murkowski campaign spokesman Steve Wackowski. “The senator relayed to him that she has to spend time in Washington doing her job and the time for campaigning is in August.”

The Miller campaign has accused Murkowski of “ducking” debates and purposely positioning the schedule to begin after absentee voting begins Aug. 9. In a press release, Miller also criticized Murkowski for not holding a debate in Anchorage, the state’s largest population center, despite the fact that the KAKM debate will take place there.

DeSoto said that the campaign still takes issue with the KAKM debate not being more open to the public.

Wackowski said it is “silly” to think Murkowski is avoiding debates and that the campaign never received a written debate proposal from Miller.

Contact staff writer Chris Freiberg at 459-7545.
Comments
(17)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
unitypeace
|
August 12, 2010
There is information contradicting Joe Miller and his statement he is not affiliated with racists, and possibly racist himself (Source: Tea Party Express Comes to Anchorage; Story and Photo Annie Feidt, APRN – Anchorage; Mon, July 19, 2010). Since I have no faith in politicians, and he is one, I challenge him to take a lie detector test before the election 8/24/2010 to vindicate him of the accusation. If he refuses, then I would presume he is a liar. THE OPTION STANDS JOE MILLER. IF YOU'RE NOT A LIAR, THE TEST WILL VINDICATE. PROVE IT!
Conserv
|
July 16, 2010
batty man and friends, all of your comments seem to from a Im wealthy and millers not point of view. If you want to say that bush started this mess, this is true, but its the continued support of the current political establishment that will keep this ressession or depression going. Lisa is the establishment and Joe miller is a man of true integrity and honesty, its to bad you and your freinds here dont know what that is!
AggressiveProgressive
|
July 16, 2010
Thanks, Pearl. Money should not be part of elections at all. We should have a publicly owned station dedicated specifically to the political process. Candidates should be required to have a certain number of citizen signatures in order to be on the ballot, and debates should be mandatory. Real debates and public questioning, not the shams we're stuck with now. Keeping money out would give Joe/Jane citizen more of a fair shake against the uber-wealthy as well as corporate lobbyists, who should not even exist in a citizen-run government. As our system now stands, a regular citizen has a snowball's chance in hell to make it into office, especially after the Constitutional terrorists made their fateful decision last January. Welcome to Amerika, Inc.
chena13
|
July 15, 2010
remember

Lisa's daddy gave her the senate seat

now she is trying to buy it with this type of money..

Fifty-eight percent of Murkowski's total campaign money for this election has come from political action committees. Maryland-based Constellation Energy and Edison Chouest Offshore, a Louisiana firm involved in offshore oil operations, have been the top two donors to her campaign through employees and PACs. That's according to an analysis by the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics

is this the type influence you want

your senator answering to ...
Pearl=W
|
July 15, 2010
AggressiveProgressive - I agree 100%!!! I'd very much like to hear some open, free ranging debates in all political campaigns. I think ads and "poli-speak" sound bites on various topics [usually advertized as 'debates', which they are not] are pretty worthless.

I think it would benefit our society if campaigns, and campaign spending were distinctly limited. A $2.5mil 'campaign chest' smacks of an intention to purchase political office by manipulation of public opinion through a massive "ad campaign". A much better informed public would result from a handfull of open [real] debates on topics and policies, and a few position papers from canidates, and they would not need to preceed the election by very long.

batman - maybe DNM is carrying so much "Miller news" because the more you hear, the worse he sounds??

lala - political party affiliation in AK is mostly just for the PR value, draws the 'loyalists' from a voting population. In reality, all powerful political 'in-groups' in AK belong to the same party, the Commerce Party, generally.
northpoleone
|
July 15, 2010
Maybe instead of Miller, Mr. DeSoto should debate Lisa. After all, he seems to speak for Miller even more than Miller speaks for Miller. Who is he anyway? Is he some Tea Party paid Outsider who is running Miller's campaign? Yes, I know, Lisa has a "spokesman" too. Guy names Wackowski. And, he's not from Fairbanks either, but at least he's from Alaska (Anchorage, I think). And, Senator Murkowski is in Washington, with the Senate in session. Apparently, Miller isn't working right now, and has more time to campaign. He should be able to speak for himself. Otherwise, how are people supposed to know who he is?
CoolRon
|
July 15, 2010
I know that during the last presidential campaign at least two sitting US Senators were campaigning for two years! Senator Murkowski can and should find the time if she wants to keep her job.
lalaleelou
|
July 15, 2010
"Miller said he approached Murkowski during the July 8 Anchorage Republican Women’s luncheon at the home of former Gov. Bill Sheffield and proposed a schedule of four debates."

Now, that's interesting! Bill Sheffield was a Democrat when he was governor!

Despite all of the hooplah about how Lisa got there in the first place, I have been as pleased with her as one can be with a politician. It would take someone far better than Joe Miller to entice my vote away from Lisa.

akfish
|
July 15, 2010
Murkowski has time in July to go fishing with Washington power brokers in the Kenai river classic but she doesn't have time for a live Debate?

I know of at least two south central groups that have offered to sponsor a debate in July and she did not even have the courtesy to respond.

Just like she did not respond to the parental notification people, she just showed up unannounced for her photo op.

If Lisa does not set a day in July for a real 90 minute debate with Joe Miller she IS ducking not only debates but her constituents.

I hope she has fun fishing with the lobbyist this year it may be the last chance she gets.
AggressiveProgressive
|
July 15, 2010
With the technology available today, Lisa doesn't have to be in Alaska to have televised debates. They could be arranged electronically for both candidates to have meaningful discussions of the issues with public input just like a teleconference. But for some political reason, candidates don't have real debates anymore. They have contrived press conference sort of things, in which the questions are answered in meaningless political rhetoric.

It's not just Joe and Lisa, it's ALL the races these days. Politics has nothing to do with the truth, nor the real issues facing real people. Elections are contrived media events put on by those who make lots of money producing them.
41yrsinFbx
|
July 15, 2010
The Aug. 10 meeting with the Fairbanks Chamber of Commerce should be open to the public. I'll be there and am interested if seeing Miller in person will confirm my feelings that he's a little whiny.
bumpo
|
July 15, 2010
DHutchison

I agree with your comments about the Senator having scheduling conflicts, and her job as Senator trumps politicking. But I wonder why the two candidates couldn't have scheduled debates during the 4th of July recess. Was the Senator in Alaska, and if not, why not?

It is never in the incumbent's advantage to allow the challenger equal face time. I think that's what we're seeing here.
Boodrow
|
July 15, 2010
Maybe someone in the debate will get Lisa to actually state a yes or no answer on Cap & Tax and amnesty for illegal aliens. She has been avoiding any real answer on these issues for months.
DHutchison
|
July 15, 2010
I worked for Senator Stevens. Many people don't understand that a US Senator has limited time between sessions to travel the State and visit constituents across the State, not just in one or two locations. If you are doing your job, representing your constituents in Washington, DC, you don't miss important floor votes. Unfortunately, you can't plan those voting times to fit your individual schedule. If Senator Murkowski left DC before scheduled breaks, to campaign, people would complain she is putting her political career before her job of representing us.
Charliebussell
|
July 15, 2010
Lets have as open a debate as we can...this is an important race and who ever is elected can and will have an effect on us all. We all need to be as informed as we can to make the best choice when voting in August.

We lost Ted because a LOT of information was held from us.
twain
|
July 15, 2010
Poor little feller, just cant have his way, so he will have a temper tantrum. Maybe silly sarah can come to his defense.
Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.