Fisheries managers ask for conservation on Yukon River
by Tim Mowry / tmowry@newsminer.com
Jul 13, 2010 | 2769 views | 13 13 comments | 14 14 recommendations | email to a friend | print
FAIRBANKS — State and federal fisheries managers, worried the bottom has dropped out of the Yukon River’s king salmon run and not enough fish will reach their Canadian spawning grounds, are asking subsistence fishermen on the middle and upper Yukon River to voluntarily cut back on the number of kings they catch or face possible restrictions.

“We are at the point where we’re appealing for conservation measures,” biologist Steve Hayes, who manages the Yukon king run for the Department of Fish and Game, said Tuesday in the Yukon River Drainage Fisheries Association’s weekly teleconference. “Restrictions could be necessary if Canadian origin fish passage does not improve.”

That news didn’t sit well with fishermen who have been hampered by high water and debris for the past week and are now just beginning to put their nets and fish wheels back in the water.

Making matters even more tense is the fact most fishermen on the lower river have caught all the kings they need for subsistence, as well as almost 9,000 “incidental” kings in commercial fishing openings for summer chum salmon, which they have been able to sell for $5 per pound.

Fishermen on the middle and upper Yukon expressed frustration with managers during Tuesday’s teleconference.

“The department’s management strategy is totally unfair to fishermen above Y1 and Y2,” fishermen Mickey Stickman in Nulato said, referring to the areas on the lower Yukon where commercial fishing for summer chums has occurred. “They get to meet 100 percent of their subsistence needs, plus they get to commercial fish, plus they get to sell their incidental king catch.

“We don’t get to meet our subsistence needs and then we get cut off,” he said angrily.

Stickman wasn’t the only fishermen who was upset with the Department of Fish and Game’s management of the chinook run.

Tanana fishermen Charlie Campbell said nobody in that village has even met 50 percent of their subsistence needs yet. Subsistence fishing, not commercial, should take priority, he said.

“From the upriver point of view it rankles to see that commercial fishery going on,” Campbell said during Tuesday’s teleconference. “Those fish are being taken in the lower river at the expense of fishermen upriver.”

While they are sympathetic, state fisheries managers say they don’t have much choice at this point, given the low number of kings that have passed a sonar counter at Pilot Station, about 120 miles upstream from the mouth of the Yukon River.

The Pilot Station sonar count through July 12 was approximately 110,000 fish, and the number of fish passing the sonar the last week has dropped significantly, making managers nervous they will not get enough fish to Canada as required by the Pacific Salmon Treaty, an international agreement between the U.S. and Canada.

According to the treaty, Alaska managers are supposed to get somewhere between 42,500 and 55,000 fish past a sonar counter near the village of Eagle, about 16 miles downstream of the border.

Through July 12, the number of kings counted at the Eagle sonar stood at 294. The average for that date is about 1,900.

Because this year’s king run was late, it’s still too early to project how many fish will reach the border, but Hayes said there is “growing concern” it won’t be enough.

Fishermen are being asked to reduce their king salmon harvest and focus more effort on summer chums where possible and to cut down on extended sharing with family members who don’t live in the community.

Commercial fishermen have caught approximately 153,000 summer chum salmon in a dozen commercial openings and about 8,900 kings, Hayes said. Of the king harvest, Hayes said genetic testing indicates about 25 percent were bound for Canada.

At the same time, managers say there are a surplus of summer chums in the river and they want to give fishermen on the lower river a chance to net some income by catching those fish.

Approximately 1.3 million summer chums have passed the Pilot Station sonar so and biologists are projecting a run of about 1.5 million. Managers waited until about 75 percent of the king run was through the lower river before opening commercial fishing for summer chums, Hayes noted.

“We’re probably going to take 150,000 to 200,000 chum when we could have probably have taken 400,000,” he said.

The department is still planning at least one more commercial summer chum opener in district Y1 and two more in district Y2, Hayes said.

Things won’t get much better for fishermen on the middle and upper Yukon any time soon, either. Dana Helmer in Eagle on Tuesday reported “a ton of driftwood” moving down the river as a result of heavy rain in the Fortymile region last weekend.

“Most people who had nets out are trying to get them out so they don’t get ruined,” she said. “We’ve got big trees coming down.”
Comments
(13)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
ryemil
|
July 14, 2010
For WINDRUN: No roe stripping for king salmon, they are poor quality compared to summer chum salmon(dogfish), processors won't buy king salmon roe! But thanks for your comment!
realism101
|
July 14, 2010
This is just the beginning. We have over fished our oceans and have polluted our waterways. If we do not stop fishing for 5-10 yrs, we will not replenish the species. Subsistance fishing should be the only thing allowed until the fish are replenished.
akgg
|
July 14, 2010
The fact that commercial fishing for salmon is even allowed before the salmon we need even gets upriver angers me so much. And the lower Yukon residents meet 100% of their subsistence needs?? So us upriver residents who rely on salmon for subsistence use have to pay for F&G mismanagement. Any ideas on what we can do to help?? I feel so helpless when the F&G can say whatever and us helpless people who rely havily on their decisions have to abide by them. Can we write letters , and to who? And is it just me, or didnt this happen a few times before, did they not learn?
Mushroom
|
July 14, 2010
Maybe the federal government needs to step in and manage the fishery for subsistence uses first.
ryemil
|
July 14, 2010
About all the Alaskan rivers are reporting low returns on kings, the commercial intercept fisheries(trawlers, too)are the cause of it. Their fisheries is 'big money' compared to the river systems, the trawlers have more control & power to back them. They have the money, the politians & F&G on their side to control it. Our little squeaky voices on the rivers mean very little. Until the trawlers are stopped, expect low

returns & more mismanagement from F&G. I need to express this again for the Yukon River People, upon the projection of future returns of 'kings',

F&G needs to subtract another 40,000-60,000 kings to account for the bycatch from the trawlers. Ex. If F&G thinks 170,000 kings are going to return, subtract up to 60,000 off that number then the projected return of kings will be about 110,000, closer to reality for a management plan!!!!
ryemil
|
July 14, 2010
Fish & Game new what they were doing(doing wrong)

Summer chum nets only need to be 5" mesh or smaller, F&G intendually made it for them to target the 'kings' with 6" mesh nets. The kings are worth more by far. The other reason I think F&G is playing up to the lower mouth is to satisfy them for they will keep their mouth shut about the trawlers intercption. The last time the lower mouth spoke about the trawlers, it made it to Washington D.C. This was basically a political management year for the trawlers, satisfy the lower Yukon River fishermen & the heat will not be on the trawlers!!! Because of the trawlers interception, the Yukon River suffers again, with the lower river very satisfied!!! In the future, F&G needs to subtract another 40,000-60,000 kings off their projection to account for the trawlers bycatch. I realize the trawlers are turning in false bycatch numbers to protect their fishery!!! The last 3 years of bycatch numbers are false by the pollock trawlers!!!
Fairbanksgas
|
July 14, 2010
I think that they should change the name of the department to Fish and Game Mismanagement. There is absolutely no foresight and what we get is knee jerk reaction over and over again. For sport fishing there are multiple 200 page regulation guides and they don't mean anything since there are EO's being announced daily that supersede the published regs.
SetItStraight
|
July 14, 2010
Clearly, the fisheries managers were overzealous in trying to full exploit the king salmon "resource." When you don't leave much of a margin of error, inevitably, you're going to get burned sooner or later. Unfortunately, the folks getting burned in this case are the folks who live off the land. Asking them to cut back on subsistence use after allowing for commercial exploitation of the fishery downstream is contrary to the spirit (and possibly to the letter) of ANILCA. Subsistence hunting and fishing MUST be given priority over commercial use.
Mushroom
|
July 14, 2010
"While they are sympathetic, state fisheries managers say they don’t have much choice at this point"

Well the managers did have a choice earlier, and they screwed it up. They should make sure enough fish get upriver before any commercial fishing is allowed in the lower river or out in the ocean.

Ultimately, the problem is that people are trying to use 100% of the fish resource, without any lee way for error, which is inevitable. A secondary problem is that commercial fishing takes priority over subsistence fishing because the Board of Fisheries is comprised primarily of commercial fishermen. Talk about a conflict of interest! How is it that non-elected board members are allowed to make such important decisions that impact so many people?

Shokd
|
July 14, 2010
Wait a minute! I must not understand wildlife "management". I thought conservation meant hunt and fish it to the point of extinction, then blame low numbers on a predator or invasive species, so you can hunt and fish the "responsible" critters to the point of extinction, too.
Arctic_Lynx
|
July 14, 2010
More hatcheries on the Yukon would help I suspect. Also a more examined look at where in the world Alaskan salmon travel.
LivinInterior
|
July 14, 2010
Another prime example of mismanagement of our states resources. Our state biologists are a joke.

Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.