Hensley: Do-it-yourself rural energy is needed
by Christopher Eshleman / ceshleman@newsminer.com
Apr 27, 2010 | 3952 views | 24 24 comments | 10 10 recommendations | email to a friend | print
FAIRBANKS - Willie Hensley said this morning that Alaska, particularly its energy-starved rural communities, should think about bracing for tough times.

Oil development and federal financial aid have left Alaska with great per capita wealth. They've declined in recent years, and Hensley, an icon in modern Alaska Native history, told an energy conference that Alaskans should "reconfigure our value system" to escape from dependence on aid and major development projects.

Such federal support, Hensley told roughly 400 people at the downtown Westmark Fairbanks Hotel, once meant major subsidies for power plants so villages could electrify their homes and public buildings. But Hensley said he expects Alaska may need to rely more on ingenuity and resourcefulness if it expects future improvements to the quality of life here.

"It has been nothing short of phenomenal to see the kinds of programs and services and facilities and infrastructure that we now enjoy," Hensley said. "The big question is, is it sustainable?"

Hensley's comments helped open a three-day conference on rural energy issues. The state Energy Authority and university-based Center for Energy and Power organized the conference. Gwen Holdmann, who directs the energy center, said memories of a two-year-old

spike in energy prices seems to remain fresh in public memory given the strong interest in the conference, which is held every 18 months somewhere in the state.

Holdmann said the conference aims to "bring different people together with different skill sets" to share lessons learned from energy research and development around the state.

Public concern over rural Alaska's energy costs, which tower over average costs across the United States, spiked with the prices of oil and natural gas two years ago.

While the spotlight has since dimmed, interest in this week's conference appeared strong: The energy center said roughly 450 people have registered for the conference, close to the last conference, which was held in Anchorage. It estimated roughly 95 communities have specialists - power plant operators, for example, or public decision-makers - or other residents in attendance.

Gene Therriault, a top energy aide to Gov. Sean Parnell, and key state policy makers will address the conference at 9 a.m. Wednesday morning following an 8:30 address by UAF Chancellor Brian Rogers.

Hensley, as are Therriault and Rogers, is himself a former lawmaker and has also served as state commerce commissioner. An Inupiaq from Kotzebue who played a central role as Native leaders pushed for huge settlements in land claim cases, Hensley said Tuesday that rural communities have changed with the times.

But Hensley said the cost of rural Alaska's energy, which has grown higher relative to more "powerful" urban areas, has become a political hot potato. He subtly challenged lawmakers to address the long-term needs of communities outside the road system.

"Political power and energy are obviously linked," Hensley said. "I worry because we don't look to far ahead. Our political system is geared to look, sort of, a year or two down the road."

Comments
(24)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
territorial
|
April 28, 2010
I took Mr. Hensley's remark as a slam at the state of Alaska's non-participatoy energy policy. Essentially, it is "hey folks you're on your own! . We're happy to be your cheerleaders, but we can't handle this. You figure out your own solutions and we'll back you if we agree with it".

Galena is a good example. Who can blame them for the solution for which they have arrived? The state and federal government's solutions of improving "liquid gold" storage facilities hasn't presented solutions - they are prolonging the misery. Certainly leaking diesel storage tanks had to be eliminated, but they are a dead end energy solution.

I do find it interesting that there is no session for private power producers. Utilities can't handle the competition? No wait, monopolistic utilities don't want competition! So, there is no place for them on the agenda.

Great site DT. Thanks.
noramarie
|
April 28, 2010
I'm not sure which particular "do-it-yourself" energy sources Hensley is talking about, but I think renewable sources make a lot of sense. They're not subject to price spikes, they won't run out and leave people cold in the winter, and they're everywhere in Alaska. As Shokd pointed out, sources like geothermal, hydro, wind, tidal, and even solar could be produced more or less on-site in many villages, meaning residents wouldn't have to pay so much to ship fuels in from afar and could benefit from energy industry jobs right in the community. It would be wonderful if leaders like Hensley could help promote the renewable energy investment and development that Alaskan communities really need. Much of this kind of development will depend on the kind of legislation that gets passed both within Alaska (like the sustainable energy bills that just passed in the state legislature) and nationally (in particular, the U.S. Senate clean energy bill). If we want to see these kinds of cheaper, DIY energy opportunities become available for rural Alaskans, advocating for clean energy legislation is a good place to start.
Shokd
|
April 28, 2010
I think this observation hold value for "urban" development as well. Energy companies love the idea of putting all the eggs in one basket. If all communities developed smaller coal power plants, hydro plants, wind farms, etc. they could save big time, and pull the teeth out of the big energy companies (GVEA, take note!).

Fairbanks, for instance, could profit greatly from ideas and actual development accomplished by the good folks at Chena Hot Springs. Rural areas, sitting on top of geothermal resources, could easily thumb their noses at the energy companies if they'd implement some of these ideas, too.
DistantThunder
|
April 28, 2010
Ag Pro...

You are most welcome for that handy link to the Pure Energy Directory.. Stewart Udall and Willie Hensley would get a kick out of it too.

The PESwiki Directory would make an effective college syllabus at UAF for energy studies.
AggressiveProgressive
|
April 28, 2010
DistantThunder - Thanks for that incredible site!
AggressiveProgressive
|
April 28, 2010
Villages could grow hemp and/or algae for a substantial portion of their energy needs. They'd be getting power for a lot less than the 25 million dollar start-up fee! Growing hemp would also give people plenty of raw material for other superior products like building materials, insulation, textiles, and the most nutritious food on the planet (which would improve the general health as well). Hemp can be made into hemp oil, ethanol, coal, and pellets for burning. It's a sustainable form of energy and raw material for thousands of useful products that won't poison the planet like fossil fuels and nuclear waste do. It would give the people in the villages something to produce that would add to their livelihood as well as their survival.

If each village was set up with an algae bio reactor, they could produce their own oil. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=977787795501216393# Growing algae isn't rocket science. Rocket fuel, but not rocket science. :-)

TeaPartyPatriot - Thirty years will come and the waste will have to be removed from the Toshiba battery. By that time, there might be thousands of them in use, and our children and grandchildren will have to deal with the waste eventually. I would much rather deal with clean, sustainable fuel than the toxic waste of nukes that cannot be ignored. I'm not going to call you names for disagreeing with me, even though you do. I am not a "Luddite" because I am opposed to using highly toxic fuels like uranium and plutonium to produce energy. Hemp and algae production will produce as much energy as any village needs and will put plenty of people to work in their production without the need for armed guards. Hemp/algae farms would not be targets for terrorists. It's a ludicrous argument that the Toshiba battery will create jobs in the form of armed guards, because hell, so did Auschwitz, but that didn't necessarily make it a good thing, did it?
DistantThunder
|
April 28, 2010
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory
triproad
|
April 27, 2010
Hensley for Governor. And yes, he has a solid working knowledge of the obvious, and that's good enough for me. To quote the president's teleprompter, "whether we like it or not" the old model of Govt to the rescue is coming to an end.

Change, believe in it.
out_in_the_cold
|
April 27, 2010
TeaPartyPatriot:

A couple of web sites that you might find interesting.

Bill Gates goes nuclear with Toshiba tie up.

http://www.fastcompany.com/`594671/bill-gates-goes-nuclear-with-toshiba-tie-up.

Union of Concerned Scientists ~ Subject: Review of Toshiba 4S sodium-cooled nuclear power reactor proposed for Galena, Alaska.

http://www.yritwc.org/Portals/0/PDFs/nuclearreactorlettersucs.pdf

For those that haven't heard about Galena. The town was build during WW II. It was supposed to be called West Ruby, but when the Army Corp of Engineers unload the cat off the barge it sunk out of site in the mud, so they backed up and chose the gravel bar on the north side of the Yukon River.

Yep, most of the time money trumps intelligence .. but it might be cheaper and faster to build an electrical high power inter-tie line to all the villages if that "experimental" liquid sodium cooled reactor goes super critical or an uncontrolled melt down .. AND if Washington DC is worried about the last flight of the Enola Gay headed home.
Yota99714
|
April 27, 2010
Arbiet macht frei, ja?
Isanova
|
April 27, 2010
Um, Japan actually has nuclear reactors. They also reprocess their nuclear waste for re-use, thus greatly reducing the amount of toxic waste generated. Not leaping into the tiny reactors/tomahawks until I see real specs on them.

But the real problem is obviously the native villages. Living off the road system with no jobs and taking up money... we should round up anyone not living on the grid and force-migrate them down to the lower 48 and make them work the farmhand jobs that illegal immigrants are working... no need for silly things like "minimum wage".

While we're at it, let's round up the homeless and do the same. Anyone who's been unemployed longer than 6 months and not in college should go. Single mothers living on welfare should all have their children put in state-run institutions and go out and work as well. Don't forget the Indians on lower-48 reservations as well, they're also living off the government.

In fact, I think the answer to illegal immigration is really to capture them all and, along with the above crowds, put them to work. 1/4 of their wages can goto the federal government as compensation, and we can put little exploding metal collars on them in case they try to run.

While we're at it, we should really start capturing people overseas in our wars and shipping them home to benefit our economy...

Yes, I will now run for El Presidente on the Tea-Party-Conservative-Redneck ticket, the TCRs. Our party symbol can be a giant rooster.
Yota99714
|
April 27, 2010
Why guard it? The USAF has their RTG's out at Burnt Mountain. Just has a fence, IIRC. DET460 at Eielson monitors the equipment, last time I checked.

More about it here; seemed to me this was an impact statement/study from some years ago.

http://www.fas.org/ota/reports/9423.pdf
1AhHa
|
April 27, 2010
Knowledge is power!

Have fun! The site has some graphs of oil going back mamy yeas. In 1998 oil was about 10 bucks per barrel! Now it is about 84-90. Because OPEC responding to the demands of the environmentalists agreed to cut production to run up the price of oil to reduce consumption... same trick as running up the price of cigarettes.

How does if feel to reduce the CO2? Can you tell the difference? Has your standard of living gone up or down as you save the planet?

Suggest bookmarking this site:

http://futures.tradingcharts.com/marketquotes/index.php3?market=CL

-

wsnfp

pelep
kapohomike
|
April 27, 2010
Besides being a legislator and a commissioner Willie spent 10 years as Alyeska Pipeline's director of governmental affairs. Let's not leave out the important credentials when evaluating someone's opinions. Where does this guy stand and what are his suggestions other than "looking ahead."
Flatus
|
April 27, 2010
"I'm with Willie on this. We've got to be more self-motivated and more self-sufficient."-Invictus

Great--two grandstanding fools.

No one doubts we need to be both self-motivated and self-sufficient.

The question is: How? And, from among all the answers to the "how" question, to select the best.

If either one of you was contributing to answering those questions, you'd have my support.

Posturing as you do, as so typical of the pseudo-statesmen of our time-- you have my contempt.

Simply stating the obvious and trying to make it seem as if this puts you out in front as leaders, won't do any longer.

1AhHa
|
April 27, 2010
I wounder if any of the attendees has the cojones to ask the ultimate question:

"How much profit does the State of Alaska make on a barrel of royalty crude sold the the Fairbanks Refineries?" "Does the State's amount of profit effect the price?"

Profit is when you subtract the cost of production and transportation to the refinery subtracted from the selling price.

---

If none of the 450 attendees HAVE to courage to ask the correct question and demand a factual answer -- then you all deserve to suffer!!!

Your pain is self inflicted!

tgsxx

Charliebussell
|
April 27, 2010
Susitna hydro project will provide lower rate for all none connected utilities....Lower the cost of Energy for 85% of Alaskan's and add the need PCE fee's to lower rual non-grid connected utilities and All Alaska has a brighter future.

Susitna is a large yet untapped renewable energy field for instate use...
clockwise44
|
April 27, 2010
Fairbanks needs a gas pipeline from Prudhoe Bay. Homes and generating plants here can be retrofitted to use gas and the benefits in cost and air quality would be great. If a gas line doesn’t come soon people will start converting to coal and the air quality in the valley will suffer greatly. Gas is our best hope…lets get it done!!
Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.