by Rachel D'Oro / The Associated Press
11 days ago | 1195 views | 24

|
5 
|
|
ANCHORAGE, Alaska - Democratic party leaders say many residents are thrilled over President Barack Obama's first visit to the Republican-leaning state, though he won't make a public appearance here.
The Alaska Democratic Party received at least 175 e-mails and dozens of calls with the announcement of Obama's brief refueling stop Thursday in Anchorage at Elmendorf Air Force Base.
The Democratic president will speak to troops before Air Force One heads to Tokyo for his first Asia trip.
U.S. Sen. Mark Begich, D-Alaska, will be among those attending. The two other members of Alaska's congressional delegation - Republicans U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski and Rep. Don Young - do not plan to take part.
Kevin Harun, spokesman for the Alaska Democratic Party, said Monday that because Obama's stop is a private visit, there are no planned events coinciding with the stopover.
But he said the scores of calls and e-mails his office received included people wanting to know how they could get a glimpse of Obama. One e-mailer wanted to know if the president could appear at his 3-year-old daughter's birthday party. Others just wanted to express their excitement over Obama's visit, even though they won't see him in person.
"We're hopeful that we can get the president up this summer to meet with Alaskans," Harun said. "We're happy that he'll see our servicemen and women, especially with what's going on in the world, and after the tragedy in Fort Hood."
The deadly shooting at the Texas Army post also is weighing on any response from Alaska Republicans over the president's visit. No events are planned for Thursday, said Randy Ruedrich, chairman of the Republican Party of Alaska.
"We look at the visit in view of Fort Hood, with the murders of Americans on an American installation, and we thought it would be inappropriate to stage a political event at this time," he said.
In last year's general election, Obama lost the traditionally red state to Republican John McCain and running mate Sarah Palin, then Alaska's governor. Obama garnered nearly 38 percent, while McCain received over 59 percent of the more than 326,000 votes cast.
As of early October, more than 126,000 Alaska voters were registered as Republicans, followed by more than 77,000 as nonpartisan. Among the state's total of 485,098 voters, nearly 75,400 are registered as Democrats.
It's unclear if Palin, who resigned as governor in July, will attend the Elmendorf event. Her spokeswoman did not immediately respond to an e-mailed request for comment.
Also, I never said you were a Hanity fan. I was addressing those remarks to Oh-Please, hence the name "Oh_Please" in front of the comments about Sean.
Attacking my user name must have come in handy for a person who couldn't think of a more intelligent argument, eh?
EuMesmo - I'm not a Democrat, but I agree wholeheartedly! America has become an out of control empire no matter who's in office. No other country on earth has nearly a thousand military bases all over the world or has the audacity to attack other nations for their resources like we do. We're still making enemies faster than we can kill them.
STOP THE ENDLESS WAR!
can I ask, is it because he is a Democrat or some other reason?
How ridiculous can you get?! The Bush administration invaded two nations who had nothing to do with 9-11, bulldozed the Patriot Act through Congress, promoted torture of human beings, and bailed out their banker friends to the tune of 750 billion dollars, just to mention a FEW things they're responsible for, and you say LIBERALS have a hard time taking responsibility for their actions?! What turnip truck did you just fall off of?!
Obama DID inherit the mess we're in, but he came in and made it worse with another big-banker bail out, continued the illegal invasions and torture, and ordered more unmanned drones that have killed over 730 civilians in Afghanistan since he took office. Your ridiculous partisan ranting is not only inaccurate, it serves the interests of those who remain in power no matter who's in office.
"Stop being good Republicans. Stop being good Democrats. Start being good Americans."
I wouldn't rush to see Obama any more than I'd rush to see the Shrub. They're both corporately-controlled, scumbag presidents who represent Wall Street, not Main Street.
Oh_Please, don't ya just love that Sean and his lying SOS friends? No hypocrisy there! lol Dems can do no right and Reps can do no wrong. Uh huh, sure...
John Cleese of Monty Python fame, wrote this about Sean:
An Ode To Sean Hannity
Aping urbanity
Oozing with vanity
Plump as a manatee
Faking humanity
Journalistic calamity
Intellectual inanity
Fox News insanity
You're a profanity
Hannity
"The only ideas that they espouse are ways to undermine the troops in harm's way and undermine their commander in chief while they're at war. Your candidates have no idea how to keep this economy strong."
—Sean Hannity, 10/18/06
"He’s the Commander-in-Chief. And what I find frankly repugnant about you and some of your fellow Democrats – you have undermined our president..."
—Sean Hannity, 03/19/06
"You know, Norman, those comments while we are at war, while troops are in harm's way, while he is the commander in chief, do you not see the outrage in that?"
—Sean Hannity, 11/12/07
"I have had it with members of your party undermining our troops, undermining a commander in chief while we are at war..."
—Sean Hannity, 11/05
"You don't criticize the Commander-in-Chief in the middle of a firefight. That could be construed as putting U.S. forces in jeopardy and undermining morale."
—Bill O'Reilly, 04/04
"Can we do it without distorting their legacies and pandering to anti-American elites worldwide and using their deaths to embarrass and undermine our commander in chief?"
—Michelle Malkin, 11/23/05
"On the other hand, if Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Democrat Congress are successful in undermining the commander-in-chief..."
—Tom DeLay, 04/11/07
"And furthermore, one of the fundamental principles we have in America is that the president is the commander in chief of the armed forces and attempts to undermine the commander in chief during time of war amounts to treason."
—Pat Robertson, 12/07/05
"So... The author used the word correctly, you didn't know the definition of the word and became upset, and somehow that's the News-Miner's fault?
I'm just trying to understand... "
You ought to get down on your knees and pray to the Almighty that you never understand that instead of trying to.
So... The author used the word correctly, you didn't know the definition of the word and became upset, and somehow that's the News-Miner's fault?
I'm just trying to understand...
I'm referring to the imagery that this carefully selected word creates in the story. How exciting does "dozens of calls and emails" sound as compared to "scores of calls and emails?" Not even a comparison, which is my point. A news story should be a news story, not a vehicle to flourish the information.
That's 8.5 scores BTW.