by Harry Karmun, North Pole
13 days ago | 541 views | 21

|
4 
|
|
Nov. 5, 2009
To the editor:
The winner in the runoff election is “I don’t care.” In close second is “Why should I bother?” And someone will enter the mayor’s office with a sweeping mandate from 13 percent of the eligible voters. Maybe it will suddenly seem relevant when the clean-air czar comes to confiscate your wood stove and fine you for having a junkyard.
- the story was there. It was under "National News", which is located at the bottom of the "home page" of the online version of the DNM; an updated story appears there as of tonight
- the legislation only passed the House; the Senate has yet to vote on it
- "the rest of the world" wonders what took us so long to provide our own citizens with a some kind of health care safety net like every other industrialized nation in the world
- no one is going to force you to buy your insurance policy from the government - it's a choice you will make. You either buy your own, get insurance through your work, or you buy a government policy. YOU CHOOSE.
Don't fear what you don't understand. Information is a good thing.
If I didn't know what the two reps stood on different issues, how would I have voted with conscience? Based off of some soundbite tv commercial or newspaper ad? Or maybe based on them having an R or D by their name? No, I prefer to vote for a person's views and not a single issue or party affiliation.
Kuddos to the FDNM for putting articles up and interviews, I simply did not take the time to read them. Ergo, I decided to stay in for the election (and was sick for the initial one)
Doesn't it bother anyone that a candidate running for office, makes application to fill a vacancy at State level before the tally is even in! That looks like politicians seek positions only for personal gain and really care less about working for the betterment of their community. It really is hard for voters to believe what the mouth is saying when they can't tell what the brain is thinking!
Meetings, as a whole, are so formal in the strict adherence to Roberts Rules of Order, that public participation is heavily discouraged. The agendas are very often overloaded and perhaps that is by design to further discourage public input. Often, over half of the agenda is tabled or postponed definitely and even indefinitely. Meetings are anything but friendly!
All of that said, I do agree that every citizen should attempt a pretense of actually being one!
If you don't vote you lose the right to bitch. It's really quite simple. If we want to get, we should be willing to give.
you don't need to do all that to vote. read the news? have conviction? A basic grasp on issues and a point-of-view are all you need...well, a willingness to vary your routine on election day also helps.
Now, after a year of watching the results of the '08 election, I prefer that unengaged citizens not bother going to the polls. Anybody that wants to vote should, but I don't want to encourage the uninterested and the uneducated.
As for our local election, and the apathy of local voters, how up to date are the voter rolls? Are deceased and relocated voters still counted for the overall number? I know that the total used to be hugely overstated, which in turn made the voter turnout look worse than it really was.
Head of household didn't vote? Kids don't qualify either!
Who wants to go to endless committee meetings when the latest entertainews is on? or the latest Xbox game?
I apply the same to myself. I might be more involved if it were more open process I understood and if I had my life more together, but a lot of the issues I wouldn't want to be involved in.