Energy experts to discuss Alaska’s ‘stranded’ renewable resources
by Julie Stricker / jstricker@newsminer.com
Jan 13, 2012 | 2497 views | 2 2 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Mount Cleveland, Mount Carlisle and Herbert Volcano are examples of potential geothermal energy opportunities in Alaska located far from population centers.
Mount Cleveland, Mount Carlisle and Herbert Volcano are examples of potential geothermal energy opportunities in Alaska located far from population centers.
slideshow
FAIRBANKS - Alaska’s got an energy problem, but it’s not what you might think. Yes, prices are high and the oil isn’t coming any faster out of the North Slope.

Maybe it’s time to think outside the Oil Patch.

“Alaska is the land of opportunities, particularly for renewable energy,” said Jason Meyer, Emerging Energy Technology program manager for the Alaska Center for Energy and Power. “Why aren’t we capitalizing on these? What are the challenges and opportunities?”

The answer is “heinously complicated,” Meyer said. He and Brian Hirsch of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory will discuss “Alaska’s Stranded Renewable Resources” on Tuesday at The Blue Loon for the ACEP Community Energy Lecture.

Alaska’s problem is one of too many possibilities. The state has tremendous potential for geothermal, wind, hydro, ocean power and biomass-driven energy, Meyer said.

A significant barrier is that many of the state’s renewable energy resources are located far from population centers and transportation corridors and are considered “stranded.” Even if small localized energy sources aren’t necessarily stranded, they still might not be feasible because of economies of scale, “where a local community is just too small to develop a geothermal energy source.”

ACEP and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory collaborated on a report to identify the benefits of these resources and how they can be used. Key parts of the framework are transportation as an opportunity, including increased Arctic shipping as polar ice melts; developing place-based industry and new technology.

A lot of the discussion arises from what Iceland and Norway have been doing. Both are countries that are perceived to have similar resources and economies of scale as Alaska.

“What about high-voltage direct current, which Norway is doing very successfully?” Meyer said. “It’s really what started this conversation: What’s the reality in terms of life in Alaska?

“We have tons of geothermal, but it’s out in the middle of nowhere.”

Contact staff writer Julie Stricker at 459-7532.

IF YOU GO

What: ACEP Community Energy Lecture Series: Alaska’s Stranded Renewable Resources

When: 6-7:30 p.m. Tuesday

Where: The Blue Loon, 2999 Parks Highway

Cost: Free 

Info: http://www.uaf.edu/acep/

This presentation will also be web-streamed courtesy of UAF, Cooperative Extension Service: http://www.ustream.tv/user/ACEP_STREAM/shows

 

Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
andora@nushtel.net
|
January 17, 2012
The answer to unstringing our natural renewable and non-renewable is lack of effective leadership.

Alaskans are suffering from an on-going energy crisis,especially in our villages, that our political, regional corporation, AFN, and other leaders are failing to address and fix.

We will never have affordable, reliable, and long term energy security until we get leaders who WANT to lower the cost of energy for Alaskans.
andyandesite
|
January 13, 2012
“We have tons of geothermal, but it’s out in the middle of nowhere.” Is perhaps an overstatement. Alaska does have stranded geothermal resources, but not in huge numbers. The best known is at Geyser Bight, on the north side of the narrow waist of Umnak Island. Geyser Bight is probably capable of producing electricity in the range of several tens to a few hundreds of MW. There are a few other sites with probable "sure bet" resources. Makushin (near Unalaska/Dutch Harbor) is also one of the best known resources. It is not true that all volcanoes have geothermal resources (resource being a reservoir that is sufficiently hot, shallow, and voluminous for production) - and Cleveland, Carlisle and Herbert are not obvious prospecting targets. It is also not true that Alaska is geothermally (or geologically) similar to Iceland despite repeated public claims a few years ago. Yes, we have some good geothermal, but let's not overstate it.
Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.