Michael O. Anderson, 35, does not face any criminal charges, but prosecutors say he is an important witness in the investigation into Cox and needed to be detained because he was allegedly avoiding a subpoena.
Anderson spent more than six months in jail this year after he was arrested with Cox and three others and accused in state court of planning to kill Alaska State Troopers and court officials.
The state case was dismissed in October after a judge ruled that secret recordings made by two FBI informants without a search warrant were not permissible in court under the Alaska Constitution.
Anderson was released, but the other four remained in jail on either federal weapons charges or, in the case of defendants Lonnie and Karen Vernon, charges related to an alleged plot to kill federal officials.
The FBI took Anderson into custody again Tuesday at the home of his friend Joshua Bennett, where he had been living with his wife for the last few weeks. Bennett said Anderson was taken away by between 20 and 30 armed men wearing bullet-proof vests who would not show him a warrant.
On Wednesday afternoon, a federal judge unsealed the warrant and an FBI affidavit in support of the warrant. The affidavit, by Special Agent Richard Sutherland, adds new details to previous criminal complaints that accused Anderson of being a “computer guru” who looked up personal information on government workers for Cox.
When Anderson’s home was searched after his March 10 arrest, investigators found a notebook with a page that said “Federal Hit List” which included the name of the Deputy United States Marshall stationed in Alaska, Sutherland said. Elsewhere, the notebook contained the names of three Fairbanks TSA employees who apparently would not let Cox pass a security checkpoint wearing body armor and the words “I need the names of federal marshals” along with a note suggesting he consult the paperwork of Karen and Lonnie Vernon. A separate document had research into finding the address of workers from the Alaska Office of Children’s Services who clashed with Cox over the custody of his children in 2010.
After Anderson was arrested in March, he was interviewed about a list of home addresses for law enforcement officers, Sutherland said. Anderson said he spent a day on the computer working on the list for Cox, but later decided the list could be used for violence and that he didn’t “want to go that route,” according to the affidavit.
Since Anderson’s October release, Sutherland said Anderson has not made himself available to be served a grand jury subpoena, boarding up his home on the Elliott highway, not answering his phone and telling his lawyer not to accept the subpoena.
Reached on the phone in his home in Florida, Anderson’s father, Mike Anderson, said he’s previously tried to keep a low profile in the case, but agreed to speak on the record because he believes matters have gotten “out of hand” with his son’s detention Tuesday.
Far from hiding, he said Anderson was in communication with authorities and knew he was wanted at a grand jury in Anchorage.
After Anderson’s release in October, his father said the younger Anderson was in contact with authorities about the grand jury and planned to cooperate because he does not have any information to hide.
“They know exactly where he was,” he said. “They’ve been monitoring our phone calls.”
Anderson did not return to his home on the Elliott highway after he was released because he could not afford to heat it, his father said. A mining engineer, the younger Anderson was in financial ruin after losing a new job he got right before he went to jail, said his father, who has been helping support Anderson’s wife and two young children since Anderson’s arrest this spring.
In addition to losing his job, Anderson’s father said his son lost his ability to fly commercially. While he was in jail, Anderson received a registered letter from the TSA stating he was on a no-fly list because he was on a list of terrorists, his father said.
In general, Anderson said his son was a pacifist, and would have had no part in any plans to kill anyone. The now-defunct criminal case against his him, he said, was based on “pompous” statements Cox made to the FBI’s informant.
Contact staff writer Sam Friedman at 459-7545.


Your right, just because it is on my private property, why would I think such a foolish thing?
Unless it is that we don't have property rights.
See how far you get.
Also , the rule in question pertains to one arrested .
Even this latter aspect possibly presents an issue pertaining to the question of his being arrested or not.
David Richard Luntz
Retired. U.S. Army. 20 years of defending your right to make stupid remarks like you do.
Desert Shield / Storm I, II & III Vet.
Airborne, Air Assualt and Bronze Star among others.
Oath Keeper, Three Percenter and Citizen Militia Member.
Protector of the Constitution and Bill of Rights
In Service of the Republic
Have a good day Sir
I hope every GI takes note this happened on Dec. 7 the 60th anniversary of Pearl Harbor.
I hope every GI & all GI's family members read & comprehend the National Defense Authorization Act that removes American freedoms.
And directs the military against Americans & American rights & freedom.
Congress has made America a military country.
Nice Mr. Dukes, why are you towing the Fed line? You KNOW for a fact that the Feds lie. Mike was served a subpoena in November, and he was dismissed from it. It is well known that I am Michael's friend, and I was never contacted by the police. It's so very odd that they had no way to get ahold of him for a subpoena, but they had no problem finding him to ARREST him. Yes, I still hold when armed men put handcuffs on you, it is an arrest. And if these armed men want to accost my or anyone's home, we deserve to see a warrant! That is our Right! Not a photo copy after the fact in the newsminer. I must be right, if they felt the need to "provide" it to the public.This whole thing is bogus and weak minded statist eat whatever is fed to them. And I was the one lied too. Wow. Pathetic.
His hearing isn't public. He has been in jail 2 more days!
He's troubled by the fact that "20-30" armed agents executed that warrant. I can sympathize that while that may be disturbing to him and his family, given mr. anderson's association with people who apparently plotted to kill and/or kidnap people, as well as the Bennett bros own statements, I think it only prudent that the warrant was executed as it was.
"I must be right, if they felt the need to "provide" it to the public."
This kind of statement is very cox-like. I think you're smarter than that Josh.
Bye the way there is a slightly different version of this in the Alaska Dispatch. It would not change anyone's position on how the see this but it might show how the media can make different views of the same issue.
SFN, it darn well does pertain to me WHEN THEY COME IN MY HOUSE. Are you kidding? You don't think so or you don't think? Read the 4th amendment. Quit letting hate and bias make your decisions. If it doesn't apply here, then it doesn't apply anytime.
And don't patronize me by calling me Cox-like and I'm smarter than that,I am not going to quit telling the truth for fear of being labeled.I am not being arrogant,I am upset. We all want to see "justice" in this 241 case, but we give the Feds a pass, when they do unjust things.
The Feds (Mr Southerland)made only a febble attempt to locate Michael. They have phone numbers and monitor his wife's and family members phones. Any of us would have directed them to Michael if they had asked, but they didn't try. Nor did they ask any of his friends. Mr Southerland in his affidavit makes it sound like they did a vigorous search for Michael but the United States FBI couldn't locate him in tiny Fairbanks. What a Crock! The reality is that they wanted to arrest him as a suspect and hold him until Cox's trial in April. This was the only legal way to rob him of his rights and keep him locked up without charges filed against him. There is no time limit for a MW warrant
"An exception to the warrant requirement is searches incident to a lawful arrest. This is also known as the Chimel Rule after the case that established it, Chimel v. California. This rule permits an officer to perform a warrantless search during or immediately after a lawful arrest. This search is limited to only the person arrested and the area immediately surrounding the person in which the person may gain possession of a weapon or destroy or hide evidence."
Now if you feel your rights were trampled on get yourself a good lawyer and file suit. Of course, any honest lawyer won't take your money, cause your claim wouldn't be found to be valid.
You MUST HAVE THE WARRANT IN THE FIRST PLACE FOR THAT ARREST TO BE LAWFUL.
If I did need a lawyer to explain what the 4th amendment to the constitution was and meant, it certainly wouldn't be you.
Either do something about or quit complaining.
Not under arrest but carted off to FCC and needs bail to get out...?
Arrest = kidnap. Bail = ransom. Secret State Police = GEheime STAat POlizei = GESTAPO.
Wilkommen zum der amerikanisher reich.
Cox and his buddies were hoping in that which is passing away. This nation will never return to what it was in its infancy. We have passed the point where the 2nd Amendment can bring about its original intent.
The heart of the nation wants a "mommy government" who will give it all it needs, instead of seeking after hard work, personal responsibility, and the Lord God who sustained the people when the nation was born. Hence, the people will unknowingly vote for their very own enslavement.
Observing this failed patriot movement from the outside sure makes me ponder where my greatest hope needs to lie --> living a quiet and peaceful life in the Lord while upon this earth, while preparing for an eternal home with God.
This is why the sealing of this warrant by the judge is so important. I wont argue at what point it was sealed....just why was it necessary to sealt...period. If they are relying on the patriot act for doing it...that shoud scare the hell out of every freedom loving american who belives our constitution means anything. Dont forget your elected congress gave them this unconstitutional powers and then renewed it. Anderson is no Al Capone...just a local thug, but no reason to use gestapo tactics in america.
I admit back in 2001-2002 I supported the patriot act. I admit back then I was wrong. It's a shame that both parties support it now.
Obviously, they are sealed to prevent the subject of the warrant from taking a hike. Once there is no longer a need for that secrecy they are unsealed, as in this case.
Sam: " I know. It's all wrong. By rights we shouldn't even be here. But we are. It's like in the great stories, Mr. Frodo. The ones that really mattered. Full of darkness and danger, they were. And sometimes you didn't want to know the end. Because how could the end be happy? How could the world go back to the way it was when so much bad had happened? But in the end, it's only a passing thing, this shadow. Even darkness must pass. A new day will come. And when the sun shines it will shine out the clearer. Those were the stories that stayed with you. That meant something, even if you were too small to understand why. But I think, Mr. Frodo, I do understand. I know now. Folk in those stories had lots of chances of turning back, only they didn't. They kept going. Because they were holding on to something.
Frodo: What are we holding onto, Sam?
Sam: That there's some good in this world, Mr. Frodo... and it's worth fighting for.
Great if NM would do a little investigative reporting in this matter. (Thanks!)
.
Hmmm, where did I read about something similar....hmmmm. OH YEA, the National Socialist Party. Yes indeed, Nazi Germany. Look at all the anti-semitism from OWS. Those damn rich Jew bankers are the reason that we are poor (please take no offense to this if you are Jewish, it is making a point).
I now direct my attention to Exibit A: BullMooseParty and other Progressives. YOU are the real brow shirts. Civil rights and individual liberty have no meaning if they impede your agend. Brian
YUM!
What makes you think for one second that I agree with the 241 plot? I, like others here, simply bring up the bigger picture this investigation. I am quite indiferent to the plight of these individuals pending a FAIR trial by a jury of their peers while protecting their rights under the Constitution. Is that a bad thing...oh, silly me, you are right. Burn them at the stake because they have views counter to yours. If our history books weren't written and taught by individuals such as yourself, we wouldn't find ourselves in a lot of our current mess. Highlight the greatness of the likes of Lincon, Teddy Roosevelt and FDR while giving little attention to Jefferson and Adams. What a shame.
Tatics like this concern me.
I'm assuming though you are a full supporter of the patriot act, so I guess my opinion doesn't matter to you...
Anyone who is quick to "hang" these guys out to dry should leave this country. You are Anti-American. We have due processes for these things and thankfully these men still have those things to assist them. Until you know their characters personally or the details of the case I think it best to withhold your judgments. Coleman Barney has 5 kids of his own and would never hurt anyone else's kids, but unless you knew him personally you wouldn't know that.
Sincerely, Chelsea Barney sister in law of the accused Coleman Barney
And to think, my only superpower is to type while in a straightjacket...
In case you forgot.