The survey was called the Alaska K-12 and School Choice Survey, sponsored by The Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice. About 1,000 people were surveyed over the telephone in September to get their views on the state’s education issues.
The survey’s margin of error was plus or minus 3.1 percent. Braun Research Incorporated, the survey organization, used a sample frame of registered voters from around the state.
People were quizzed on their knowledge of education in Alaska and asked for their opinion on the current public school system.
People were asked, “If it were your decision and you could select any type of school, what type of school would you select in order to obtain the best education for your child?”
Of Alaskans surveyed, 39 percent answered regular public school, 30 percent answered private school, 15 percent answered charter school and 11 percent answered home school. Another option was virtual school.
Currently, about 94 percent of Alaska’s students are in public schools, while about 3.7 percent are in charter schools and 2.5 percent are in private schools, according to information provided in the survey’s results.
The survey’s question number 15 stated, “A school voucher system allows parents the option of sending their child to the school of their choice, whether that school is public or private, including both religious and non-religious schools. If this policy were adopted, tax dollars currently allocated to a school district would be allocated to parents in the form of a ‘school voucher”’ to pay partial or full tuition for their child’s school. In general do you favor or oppose a school voucher system?”
Sixty-four percent favored the system and 29 percent opposed it.
Question 17 stated, “A proposal has been made that would amend Alaska’s constitution to allow state and local tax money to be allocated directly to parents, who could then use the money to send their child to the school of their choice, whether that school is public or private, including both religious and non-religious schools. In general, do you favor or oppose this kind of constitutional amendment?”
Fifty-five percent of participants favored the amendment, while 37 percent opposed it.
A House Bill proposed in February this year could have created the “Parental Choice Scholarship Program,” which could have provided public funds to schools that typically don’t receive per-pupil funding.
The National Education Association-Alaska was against the bill because, as President Barb Angaiak wrote in a message in the association’s newsletter, there is an abundance of education diversity available in public schools.
On April 1, with a hearing of House Bill 145 impending, the NEA-Alaska issued a statement that, “NEA-Alaska opposes the use of public funds for private or religious schools. Alaska's constitution is crystal clear on this issue.”
Contact staff writer Reba Lean at 459-7523.


School choice vouchers will empower parents to choose the best educational fit for their kids. Who can be against that? Under HB145, Parental Choice Scholarship Program, the parent picks the school and the funds follows the child to that choice school.
This allows low income parents to get their kids out a failing public school and provides the opportunity for all to reach maximum potential.
The public school monopoly would have to get better or go away. That is what competition does.
Suppose the government owned all the shoe stores and they only had one type, one size fits all shoes. One could not choose a type of shoe, size, or style to fit oneself.
Go to: www.alaskapolicyforum.org for the full survey.
Remember: this is about the kids, not the adults.
The Hite Report
A Tale of Two Cities
Think And Grow Rich
The Hobbit
The Catcher In The Rye
The Common Sense Book Of Baby And Child Care
Angels and Demons
The Diary of Anne Frank
In His Steps: What Would Jesus Do?
The Very Hungry Caterpillar
The Ginger Man
Where The Wild Things Are
Lolita
How To Win Friends And Influence People
The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy
Charlie And The Chocolate Factory
Peyton Place
The Bridges of Madison County
The Exorcist
The Kite Runner
What To Expect When You're Expecting
The Grapes of Wrath
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_books
Aren't we humans a wonderfully varied and creative species? So many books ... so little time. It seems a shame to waste your (or your childrens') days in self-programming, when you could be using that time to explore new worlds and ideas.
The comment about the importance of reading cannot be emphasized enough.
"Want to take a guess at which book has been read more than any other in the history of the United States?"
And why do you suppose that that is the case? Better yet, explain why your statement is in any way relevant to 1952's comments about reading.
- I have no problem with public funding going to any legit school provided that the school is willing to accept every student on an equal basis (for example the lottery system used by many charter schools) as public schools do.
- Private schools are not necessarily better than public schools. Studies have shown that charter schools generally get similar results as public schools.
- Teachers and teacher's unions have been unfairly vilified. They lobby just like other interest groups and advocate for teachers.
- Education is a team effort between teachers, parents, and students. Failure in this venture is a joint responsibility.
Lowlifes like Abraham Lincoln spent a lot of time reading it...
Save your money. Instead, take your kids to the public library; it's free, it's open seven-days-a-week, it's safe, and they don't even fine you for overdue books.
Reading is empowering and emancipating. A child busy reading is not one who's in-thrall to external entertainment... to the television or video/computer games.
The same holds true for adults.
Since I don't have kids, I don't have a reliable means to go about vetting this... anyone?
When parents who can ill-afford to pay thousands of dollars do so, they end-up working second (third?) jobs, borrowing from savings, refinancing homes, building more credit-card debt, and more... and, consequently, spend less and less time with their kids. And the kids? They might wear a uniform at school, but they're still ill-mannered, inarticulate, shallow, poorly-behaved... and unprepared for post-secondary education.
With private schools, everyone loses.
Just like its time to take a differnt approach to our governing the world, its time to take a different approach to education.
Abolishing the Dept. of Education and putting control back to the state/local control would be the best solution.
But vouchers are a good interim step.
Public education is one of the premier benefits of American democracy, and it's a terrible shame that its quality has dropped so much during the past 40 years. Private schools, charter schools, and vouchers won't fix it; they're just another symptom of Americans giving-up.
President Lyndon B. Johnson famously told us that we had to choose between "guns or butter". Sadly, we continue to choose the former... to the tune of some $3-trillion over the past ten years, in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Stalin was narrow-minded.
Mao was narrow-minded.
None of them allowed anyone but the state to educate the children.
Much damage was done under their rule.
"???? if you can't measure "it" how do you know "it" exists?"
How? By direct observation... the same way we don't need a TV weatherman to tell us it's raining outside, or that the soup's too salty.
But seriously, it's metaphorical speech: "it is impossible to measure" means that conventional notations of quantity are not sufficient to express the damage caused, throughout history, by narrow-mindedness.
???? if you can't measure "it" how do you know "it" exists?
The Washington, DC school superintendent said he can measure the effect of education on children by looking into their eyes.
Frankly, I wonder if he is mistaking the roots of their hair for education "when he looks into their eyes."
I believe the news said, the prior superintendent fired 1500 teachers before the teachers union ran her out of town.
America has been brain-washed by atheistic lawyers and the media. Don’t listen to them. The 1st Amendment is plain and simple:
“CONGRESS shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; ...”
I capitalized CONGRESS to help folks “get it”. Receiving back some of your tax dollars to fund your children’s Christian education is NOT an act of CONGRESS establishing a state alliance with any particular denomination or religion.
So few people have anything but a warped “ACLU view” of the 1st Amendment.
Why are "monopolies evil" for industry but not for education? Why are the “Occupiers” protesting corporate greed, but are not protesting the constant greedy increase in college tuition?
Could there be an incestuous relationship between public education and the Left?
I doubt there's very much, if any, "seeking" going on in the ranks of the children; and, as for their parents, I'd be much happier if they sought an "education model" that emphasized mathematics, the physical and natural sciences, reading comprehension and expository writing, history (to name a few), rather than "their belief system[s]".
It is impossible to measure the damage caused by narrow-mindedness, but there can be little doubt that one-dimensional thinking debilitates.