Alaska veterinarians office treads lightly on animal care rules
by Matt Buxton/mbuxton@newsminer.com
Oct 30, 2011 | 5029 views | 24 24 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
FAIRBANKS — The Office of the State Veterinarian is treading lightly as it begins work on drafting expanded animal health care standards for sled dogs, pets, horses and other animals.

The issue likely will be a heated discussion in a state famous for its sled dogs and sub-zero temperatures and the State Veterinarian’s office is doing all it can to make sure mushers, veterinarians and the general public will get a say in shaping the standards.

The revisions are aimed at clarifying and strengthening the role of the state troopers and animal control officers when dealing with animal neglect and abuse cases, said Assistant State Veterinarian Jay Fuller during a work session to gauge interest and get a sense of preliminary concerns in Anchorage on Thursday.

“One of the big reasons that we need to develop standards is to make it more clear to animal control officers and peace officers and to veterinarians and to the general public what constitutes proper care, what constitutes lawful care and what constitutes humane care,” he said.

The office hopes to create expanded standards in five animal categories: and will fall into five categories: domestic animals — which includes sled dogs as well as pets — horses, livestock, birds and exotic animals.

To make sure the standards are realistic and acceptable to the general public, Fuller said the office of the state veterinarian will host multiple public work sessions with each group during the next few months before proposed standards are released for formal public review next summer. Anyone is invited to attend the sessions in person or on the phone.

The state has posted a preliminary draft of care standards, which already has drawn some concerns, but Fuller reminded the audience they are solely intended as a starting place and he expects to see them change as the public shares its input.

“We don’t know what it’s going to look like,” he said. “It could be possible that sections of this document will look like they do now, and it’s possible that other sections could end up drastically different.”

Fuller went out of his way to calm concerns that the proposed standards might make it difficult or even illegal to mush dogs.

“There won’t be any adopted regulations that will make it against the law to mush dogs,” he said, “but what is up for public discussion are things that constitute proper minimal animal care.”

Revised changes would be enforceable by state troopers and municipalities with police powers.

More information on meetings, the proposed standards and the state’s effort, visit the vetrinarian’s website at www.dec.state.ak.us/eh/vet/.

People interested in participating in the discussions should email Fuller at jay.fuller@alaska.gov and indicate which category or categories they are interested in.
Comments
(24)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
akcoins
|
November 01, 2011
Mr.roadtrip, Did you read the comments I was referring to? Most of the comments weren't referring to govt. mandates. Typical right winger, doesn't look at the whole picture just make comments that support their view. I suppose that justasking was really concerned about govt. mandates. By the way we were a liberal state before all the oil money brought up the carpetbaggers.

Why don't you take a long road trip back to the lower 48? Things were so much better before all you people moved up here (If you can make comments that don't have any basis in reality I can too).
really_wow
|
November 01, 2011
Why on earth is Alaska following countries such as Scandinavian and Baltic countries, Switzerland, New Zealand, Dutch parliament on this?????
CougarMike
|
November 01, 2011
When you refer to Dr. Jayne be advised it wasn't the fact that the State wouldn't fund him it was the fact that he wasn't getting funded from whomever he saw. Imagine to yourself the costs of traveling out to the villages. Don't read so much into this, exsanguination of pets should be illegal.
nuckolsm
|
January 06, 2012
Serious question: If you believe exsanguination of pets should be illegal, what would be the best way to butcher a chicken? Is breaking its neck better? Or, are you against all animal butchery?
nuckolsm
|
November 01, 2011
The News-Miner had a good editorial on Dr. Jayne worth reading in this case:

http://newsminer.com/view/full_story/5716721/article-Unfortunate-exit--Veterinarian’s-resignation-warns-of-overly-strict-standards-of-care?

Babydoll_W
|
October 31, 2011
Yes, they are probably refering to Dr. Jayne...and I find it troubling that someone is drove out of practice by a competing vet's complaint! I suspect the only real issue was the fact that he was unwilling to charge the outragous fees the rest do.

I was quoted 1200. for give cat a cathitor with an additional 800 for the following manditory two days to be monitored that normally costs no more then 250. in lower 48 with a 50 overnight fee. Price Gouging at it's finest.

Really, more regulations??!!

Highway robbery!!
BudO_Fairbanks
|
October 31, 2011
Good idea- lets have a department of redundancy department.

If we don't spend the fed's money, they might not give us any more- besides, there are still some government employees with unemployed relatives.
JaniceFbx
|
October 31, 2011
I've read the proposals regarding sled dogs; the language is extremely weak, and essentially changes nothing.

On a different note, someone below mentioned that "we" (meaning the State)is broke, but that is not true...we have a surplus.

Kamen
|
October 31, 2011
--The state vet, dec and the ak vet board went through extreme measures get rid of the low cost veterinary care program that was not funded by the state because they felt it was cutting into profits.--

I hope that isn't a reference to Dr. Jayne quitting his "practice" rather then answer for his violations and try to change the regulations for rural areas.

islandliver
|
October 31, 2011
I'm sure few of these astute posters have ever been to the animal shelter to see just what wonderful care some folks give their critters. It's too bad they might stop some of you from abusing animals (not always your own.)

What is most revealing is the post complain about a practice that is not mentioned in the story. Now that provided readers with insight to the sick minds of some posters. Why would a poster bring something not contained in the article into the forefront if that is not what they do to critters as a matter of course?

Mr.roadtrip
|
October 31, 2011
What, you think Gandhi was talking about govt mandates? Typical liberal, thinks govt is the nation. No country treats it's critters better then we do. Our dogs enjoy a better standard of living then the average third world person.

When it come to govt less is more.
akcoins
|
October 31, 2011
The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated... I hold that, the more helpless a creature, the more entitled it is to protection by man from the cruelty of human kind-Gandhi. I can see from the comments on this page that the greatness and moral progress of this nation has a long way to go.
maveric
|
October 31, 2011
It's already required that animals be provided food, water and shelter. Do they want to add make the veterinarians richer?

I'm all for low cost spay/neuter clincs to reduce numbers of unwanted pets and pet education but not something like this that will make vet visits mandatory by law as a form of revenue for themselves.

Especially after these same people fought so hard to shut down the only nonprofit program that provided vet care to 70 remote communities.

justasking
|
October 31, 2011
dog meat is tasty, don't waste dog meat.

I hate cats IMO we should kill all cats by any means possible..also the cats kill wild birds..

also don't feed the ducks below the power plant on the cheana river,,make feeding the ducks a felony.
maveric
|
October 31, 2011
Just so everyone knows, DEC and the state vet started the ten year long investigation that shut down the only nonprofit veterinary care program to 70 remote communities.

THEY WANT A "STANDARD OF CARE" IN THE CITIES AND "NO CARE" IN THE REMOTE AREAS.

The state vet, dec and the ak vet board went through extreme measures get rid of the low cost veterinary care program that was not funded by the state because they felt it was cutting into profits.

This is about revenue not the animals.

Luntzd
|
October 31, 2011
Per the state DEC site: "Any determination as to whether or not the standards of this chapter are met shall be based on the professional opinion of a veterinarian licensed under AS 08.98".

Opinions are like - well you know.. everyone has one. This is b.s. // our states administration is hampering business growth not helping it.

Now our under staffed LEOs will have to be monitoring pigs, chickens, horses and dogs.. i guess that means AST will need a new division to carry out this mission.

All this is - is more jack booted intrusion into our lives.

If the state representatives would stop accepting this federal money, maybe they wouldnt feel so abliged to Quid Pro Quo our rights and privacy away. Doubt it though.
AggressiveProgressive
|
October 31, 2011
We're broke, but we can afford frivolous BS like this? Sorry, I'm not buying it. Spend the money on more health insurance for the human children in our state.
nuckolsm
|
October 31, 2011
The state's webpage for the proposal is located here:

http://www.dec.state.ak.us/eh/vet/AnimalCareWorkshop.html

One thing I have already noticed is they are adopting a standard of practice for euthanization by reference. In the standard, they cite "exsanguination" as being unacceptable. This means that if animals are butchered by having their throats cuts - a traditional method particularly among those seeking Kosher meats - you are guilty of animal abuse.
aurorawatcher
|
October 31, 2011
You have to know how this is going to go. We'll show up for the public hearings with legitimate concerns and suggestions, they'll thank us for our input and then they'll do what they were going to do all along because they "know better than we do". Mark my words.
swanny1790
|
October 31, 2011
There is currently a trend throughout North America toward establishment of baseline "standards of care" for the treatment of animals. This trend has been accelerated by some high profile abuse cases, some of which involve sled dogs as well as so-called "puppy mills", poorly managed "rescue shelters" and so forth.

Having read the draft that DEC had on-line, it was instantly clear that the proposal regarding dogs was about as lame as possible, reflecting little understanding of the physiological and psychological needs of dogs. I can't speak for standards proposed for other species, because I haven't studied those other species.

I would suggest that a widely accepted standard of care for dogs is already available, in the form of the current (3rd edition) Mush with P.R.I.D.E. Sled Dog Care Guidelines. The guidelines are free of charge and can downloaded at http://www.mushwithpride.org/Guidelines/PDFs/3rd Edition guidelines, edited1.pdf
aksala
|
October 31, 2011
When you have a vet office obtaining $5 million in Obama stimulus money to build a new facility, you better believe they will increase regulations to generate new business. Amazing, 100 years ago not only wasn't Fairbanks here, there weren't any vets either, but how many dogs were there.
Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.