North Pole and its surrounding areas have seen the smokiest winters in the area, according to the Fairbanks North Star Borough’s monitoring results. They also were a stronghold against the proposition, which would have banned certain wood- and coal-fired heating devices in the core populated area and introduced regulations for wood burners.
The North Pole-area precincts all resoundingly voted “no” — from a low of 75.54 percent in the city of North Pole to 82 percent in the Badger Road precincts.
City residents do have concerns about air quality, said North Pole Mayor Doug Isaacson.
The vote reflected the community’s investment in the wood- and coal-fired heaters and a desire to negotiate any attempt to clean up the air, he said.
“There was a suspicion that the initiative is too broad and cuts too deep,” he said. “I believe everyone wants clean air, but this wasn’t the vehicle.”
Many have echoed Isaacson’s analysis, including voters in typically left-leaning precincts near the university. Voters in those precincts came out in support of Proposition 2, but did so at a much slimmer margin than opponents did in areas like North Pole.
The University Campus precinct provided the proposition’s strongest support in the borough, with about 65 percent voting “yes.” Other neighboring precincts averaged about 50 to 60 percent voting “yes.”
The University West precinct, where smoky days keep Woodriver Elementary School students indoors during recess, offered moderately strong support for the initiative. In a place that has been a focal point for clean air proponents, 56 percent of voters said “yes.”
“This was a hard one,” said John Callahan, a neighbor who agrees that smoke is a problem but voted “no.”
“It came down to that there are some of those hydronic heaters burning cleaner than wood stoves, and I don’t think it’s fair to shut them down,” he said.
In Fairbanks No. 8 precinct, which covers the smoke-laden Hamilton Acres neighborhood, 55.9 percent of voters said “no.”
Proposition 2 also found little support outside the non-attainment area, where the bans and regulations wouldn’t reach. The staunchest opposition in the borough came from the Salcha precinct, where 87.59 percent of voters said “no” to the initiative.
At the end of the day, two of the area’s three mayors agreed that the “no” vote didn’t reflect a lack of concern among borough voters about clean air.
Borough Mayor Luke Hopkins said the vote reflected a consensus that a discussion between interested parties must commence.
As the Environmental Protection Agency’s 2014 deadline to get the borough into meet federal air quality standards looms, North Pole’s Isaacson said, the borough and state leaders will have to figure out something. They’ll do that through involved discussions, and that’s the way people want it, he said.
“When it comes to regulation, we have a lot of folks who say ‘show me,’” he said. “That can create healthy conversation and dialog. We need to make sure we’re not attacking issues on an emotional basis and thoroughly explore the consequences of any regulation.”
Contact staff writer Matt Buxton at 459-7544.


SaidSo: "The rich upper-class in UAF West who can afford oil voted YES." Really? I'd have put it this way: The most educated people in the Fairbanks area voted YES.
I would put it another way-"the most educated people in Fairbanks" have the herd instinct of sheep. On top of that they easily become intoxicated on vogue ideologies.
From the history book: "if it were not for the doctors, the lawyers, the preachers, politicians, newspapers, and scientists the Holocaust would not have been possible."
I would add if it were not for smart people war would be impossible.
Hit the scroll back button on the bottom of the "Opinion" page and look at all the vote yes letters.
Yes took a betting 2 in row
You never know, next you could have more success duping voters when you claim steam from SUVs is wood smoke. See page 9 FNSB pamphlet "air quality Fairbanks" bottom left picture.
The borough only recommends people "with respiratory or heart disease, elderly and children should remain indoors" when the PM 2.5 levels are over 500.
Below the 500 ug/m^3 level the borough recommends "avoiding prolonged exertion outdoors".
Nowhere in the document does the borough recommend anyone take any simple filtering precautions to protect your health from wood smoke.
They don't even recommend covering your nose with a sheet of toilet paper.
"Let them pay $.25 a kilowatt to heat their house versus a poultry $4000 a year for fuel oil."
Is a poultry $ a new currency in Ester? What is the exchange rate?
Since I don't qualify under your conditions (I vote, and I actually didn't vote for Prop A), I would like to ask you a question. Would you support the idea Carebear35 came up with? If not, why not?
I also like akbob's idea from a few articles ago. I think the combination of the two would help quite a bit.
It is completely possible that the day chosen was a total coincidence. However, even if they did coordinate the burning with election day, would they admit it?
"The North Pole-area precincts all resoundingly voted “no” — from a low of 75.54 percent in the city of North Pole to 82 percent in the Badger Road precincts. "
October 4th, 2011 by Pat Cruse
Marmian Grimes
907-474-7902
10/3/11
The Fairbanks Experiment Farm at the University of Alaska Fairbanks is burning brush this week as part of its normal preparation for the winter season.
The farm burns brush at regular intervals during the year, when conditions allow staff members to do so safely.
Members of the public may notice smoke in the area. The farm is located near the agriculture fields on the southwest corner of campus.
That's funny.
By the way, to the posters who (1) are saying "yes, we need to solve it, but I don't trust the evil government"; (2) also voted "yes" for Prop A; (3) made a bunch of noise so that the borough removed the teeth (fines) from the original ordinance; and (4) are with a few exceptions the same people who continually rail against state and federal regulations as a matter of principle: how's that working for us so far? Is the air cleaner NOW than it was before you got involved? Did everyone get all educated and responsible during that 3-4 years, like you said they would?
Maybe it was just them - I knew they were burning something, but I find it surprisingly that their smoke alone would be so widespread. I also find it suspicious that the UAF (which happens to be a liberally-slanted institution) chose to burn all their brush on election day, of all days.
It's too big of a coincidence for me to believe that they did it on that day with no idea that they could be "helping" some people to vote for the "clean air" proposition.
35 consecutive days of -50F, add $5.50 a gallon home heating oil with a touch of chronic power outages a pinch of a few runs on the store for staple foods and you will see the these Prop2 supporters fly south or eat crow. Funny how hard cold reality gets in the way of their inconvenient untruth.
Had this monstrosity passed we all know what the future would be like:
Your cord wood piles subject to annual Borough inspections, the cord ends would have cute little "FNSB Passed 2013" stamps, storing cord-wood on your property? Then you better have a wood harvest permit! Exceed the birch limit for that year?, ah oh, $600. per cord fine, storing cord wood in your yard past August without the Borough $60. per cord wood Stamp? Fire wood confiscation and an $800. fine and a wood harvest suspension for five years, get caught poaching wood during that time and have the borough stove police remove the wood stove from your home at your own expense.
Really? I'd have put it this way:
The most educated people in the Fairbanks area voted YES.
Please elaborate on how the AP twisted it. Downtown North Pole which has the worst smoke problem of all, voted overwhelmingly against it.
Just because you don't like the headline, doesn't mean its inaccurate.
No sense in being embarrassed now, its too late.
Fairbanks need to have one protesting the local elected & the state congress & their failure to get a natural gas line put in & for not listening to the voters.
A little state & national embarrassment served up by both sides of the voting.
A little team work from both sides of Prop.2 ...with local & national media & citizens.....
Embarrass them & their p--- poor excuses & inaction...
Smokiest Fairbanks neighborhoods strongest in opposition to clean-air measure
Associated Press
Read more: http://www.adn.com/2011/10/06/2107722/smokiest-fairbanks-neighborhoods.html#ixzz1a3N2Skds
One of my biggest issues with this deal is that NOTHING is pushed upon home owners, it should be their own choice. The incentives, both monetarily and enviornmentally, should be the modivation factors.
My heart will ALWAYS be in ALASKA, and I want to protect it so that it will be just as beautiful in centuries to come. But, I don't want to give up the freedoms that Alaska's nature blesses us with and requires of us in the process. I don't think that anyone else is willing to do that either.
Could not have said it any better.
Anyone who would like to take my idea and make it into a decent proposal for a petition is very welcome to do so. I think that everyone agrees that something needs to be done, and hopefully this idea is a way to reach the better air standards.
Put it up for petition, and I'll sign it. I think I would even help try to pass it.