North Pole '241' militia suspect asks for lower bail
by Jeff Richardson / jrichardson@newsminer.com
Jun 29, 2011 | 6174 views | 17 17 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
FAIRBANKS — One of the defendants accused of participating in the “241” murder conspiracy plot is asking the federal court to lower his bond on federal weapons charges.

Attorney Tim Dooley said he planned to file documents on Wednesday asking for a federal bail review for North Pole resident Coleman Barney, who is being held without bond. If the move is successful, the 36-year-old electrician hopes he can gather enough money to get out of jail, Dooley said.

Barney convinced state Superior Court Judge David C. Stewart on Friday to drop his bail on state murder and kidnapping conspiracy charges from $2 million to $100,000.

Dooley said relatives and supporters have scraped together enough money to pay the bond.

Dozens of relatives, friends and church members sent letters to the court requesting a lower bail for Barney. His wife, Rachel, gave birth to the couple's fifth child Friday.

Barney remains imprisoned, however, because he also is charged with federal weapons violations.

“If it was just the state charges — which are more serious than the federal charges, I should add — he’d be out,” Dooley said.

Barney is one of five local defendants with ties to the Alaska Peacemakers Militia who are accused of concocting an elaborate plot they dubbed “241.” That effort, which was reportedly discussed during hundreds of hours of secret FBI recordings, involved a conspiracy to kill two Alaska State Troopers or state judges anytime a militia member was arrested or killed by authorities.

Prosecutors say the plot was concocted to protect Schaeffer Cox, the militia leader who was a fugitive last February for failing to appear at trial in February on misdemeanor weapons charges. Coleman and Rachel Barney also are charged with harboring Cox as he hid from authorities.

Contact staff writer Jeff Richardson at 459-7518.
Comments
(17)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
momofafew
|
July 03, 2011
Only the defendants, the attorneys (to some degree), the judges and to some degree the victims (the ones that had their lives threatended (to be killed or kidnapped) know some of the details of this case. Many times speculation goes in directions by well meaning individuals that do not always reflect much factual evidence or truth. I doubt if the defendants are presenting anything but their best selves to everyone (do they really want to do anything but present their best selves; what is in their best interest?) Of course, they are innocent until proven guilty. I am going to take a somewhat wild guess in assuming there is a desk FULL of evidence somewhere against them, waiting to be revealed. Until then, I don't think I'd be assuming letters from everyone, including their closest associates are anything but nice letters on their behalf, unless, of course, they witnessed something first-hand. Then, they would be, yes, evidence. I would be a little skeptical as a church member in their church (yes, I am one) of someone accused of conspiracy to commit murder. We have many different professions represented in our church. I do not myself support anyone that would murder anyone. Quite simply that is against the Commandments no matter how you slice it. I will continue to watch evidence. I am not too worried about so-in-so that says he or she or they are nice people or this, that or the other. Almost all criminals have character references. Not impressive. It's also not impressive that criminals go to church (if they are criminals). All are welcome to attend any church, unless, of course, they are in jail.

Pearl=W
|
July 02, 2011
You know, Jeff_S, I can't help but wonder how you would expect this woman accused, to be able to earn an income sufficient to feed and clothe 5 children, AND provide the 24/7 care and oversight any 5 kids need, AND provide for her own defense in court [a constitutional right of us all], all by herself, with her husband imprisoned fairly indefinitely . . . all without *some* form of outside assistence. Punitive action before a person has been given the opportunity to defend themselves, before there has been proof of their guilt submitted and accepted by a Court, is not permitted by our Constitution and is highly offensive to most of us. But very often, it IS what actually occurs, frequently from the very moment of LE 'suspicion', no matter how unfounded or questionable that suspicion may be, and very certainly, the filing of charges and the necessity of defending one's self in a case such as this one, IS an extreme burden on the accused, arguably quite punitive in and of itself, if you consider the incarceration, the inability to earn a living, support one's family, etc.
freetheinnocent
|
July 02, 2011
Hey Jeff_S, maybe you should chill out with your comments about people you know nothing about! That "domestic terrorist's wife" happens to be my sister and has never done anything hurtful to anyone in her life. Innocent until proven guilty
AMarcusYoung
|
June 30, 2011
Personally, I dont just believe things because somene tells me something. There hasnt been a scrap of evidence presented so far. Its interesting to see weak minded people led like sheep by a government who has lost its integrity through corruption
Jeff_S
|
June 30, 2011
How much does anyone want to bet this domestic terrorist's wife and their 5 children will be asking for state and federal assistance before long, if they already have not? Welfare, medicaid, food stamps, energy assistance, you name it. More white conservative hypocrites, like Liar Joe Miller, who slam the government for entitlement program spending on minorities, all the while sucking up all the free money and benefits they can. Talk sure is cheap in this state/country!!
doubledumb
|
June 30, 2011
The plot thickens to a..............farce and sham stew. Give them all a reasonable bail. Oh yeah, $2,000,000.00 is a very reasonable bail for someone supposedly "talking about it"...sure it is.
islandliver
|
June 30, 2011
Every weeks there is some change to this case that provides a bit more insight as to who knew what, said what, maybe ever who told what. In any event it is still a long way till any actual trial of any of these accused of an assassination plot.

Now we see a little change in the bail for Barney. What we we read of next week?
really_wow
|
June 30, 2011
snowedin

What church has members that would bail out attempted murderers?

Ummmm snowedin

No attempt to murder was made by those charged. Sooo, they are not attempted murderers. Talk has never killed anyone.

Not only are you snowed in... you have a bad case of brain freeze.

Pearl=W
|
June 30, 2011
snowedin - a church whose members recognize "innocent until proof has been presented and judged"? Or one that either doesn't have upper level troopers in their congregation, or that eschews supporting loose gossip and gossipers? Who would have thought there was one such in Fbk, eh??
Rex_Podicum
|
June 30, 2011
bottomfish: Once you've followed these comments awhile, you'll recognize that TheAlaskaCurmudgeon's posts are (by his own admission, even) 99 44/100 percent hogwash. Don't worry about it.
snowedin
|
June 30, 2011
What church has members that would bail out attempted murderers? They should be ashamed if they had a clue.
teapartyteamster
|
June 30, 2011
Let them ALL sit there and rot...
BullMooseParty
|
June 30, 2011
We don't negotiate with terrorists.
TheAlaskaCurmudgeon
|
June 30, 2011
That reminds me, when are they going to storm the prison and free Schaeffer?
doubledumb
|
June 30, 2011
As Dooley has indicated in court, the state charges will probably go away.....and we all know why.
Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.