Alaska Department of Fish and Game asks you to please not Taser the moose
by Tim Mowry / tmowry@newsminer.com
Apr 10, 2011 | 10827 views | 15 15 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print
FAIRBANKS — It’s OK to use a Taser to stun a mugger, but you shouldn’t do the same to a moose — unless it’s about to stomp you.

The Alaska Board of Game passed a statewide proposal prohibiting the use of electronic control devices, aka Tasers, for hunting, but the new regulation does not prevent people from using a Taser on animals in defense of life and property.

According to a press release issued by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game on Thursday, the department submitted the proposal after media attention about the use of Tasers on wildlife, particularly bears and moose, and subsequent public and wildlife safety concerns related to their use.

“The department recognized the lack of authority to regulate the use of (Tasers) on wildlife and brought the concern to the Board of Game,” the press release stated. “Restricting the use of (Tasers) will reduce the risk of improper or unethical use on wildlife by the public or other agency personnel who are unfamiliar with the potential effects and hazards.”

The action was taken during a March 26-30 Board of Game meeting in Anchorage.

ADF&G Soldotna biologist Larry Lewis, the department’s Taser expert, wrote the proposal that was passed by the Game Board.

“This is referencing all use of (Tasers) for incapacitation of game in Alaska,” Lewis said.

The department isn’t as concerned with a hunter killing a moose or bear with a Taser as it is “catch and release hunting,” Lewis said.

“Conceivably someone could Tase a moose or bear, go up and get a picture taken with it, shut the (Taser) off and then release the animal,” he said.

With no regulations on the book to outlaw such an action, “it’s ripe for abuse,” Lewis said.

“What we wanted to do was kind of head off at the pass any non-trained use of this equipment,” he said.

ADF&G staff and personnel from other agencies, such as law enforcement, may be authorized to use Tasers on wildlife, but only after going through an intensive training course taught by Lewis, a certified Taser master instructor and receiving a permit. About 25 state wildlife biologists have been trained in the use of Tasers on wildlife so far, Lewis said.

Wildlife biologists in Fairbanks unsuccessfully used a Taser on a cow moose a little more than two months ago in an attempt to stun it so they could remove a rope from its neck. The moose had been roaming an east Fairbanks neighborhood with the rope since early January, when residents rescued the moose from the Chena River.

Biologists used a special wildlife Taser on Feb. 4 in the Hamilton Acres subdivision but could not get the probes to stick, which they attributed to the animal’s thick winter hair.

It was the first time state wildlife officials used a Taser on an animal in the northern region of the state.

Lewis said he has used a Taser to haze bears and moose on the Kenai Peninsula and it has been effective. He called a Taser “an electric fence in a person’s hand.”

“With all the animals, we’ve seen a 100 percent flight response and an aversion to the area it took place,” Lewis said. “They learn not to be in that place.”

Lewis also used a Taser to stun a moose so he could remove a chicken feeder stuck on its head.

“I was able to knock it down, remove the feeder, examine the animal for injuries and release it,” Lewis said.

A Taser also can be used to examine animals with injuries to see if they are suffering from a mortal wound, Lewis said.

“What people need to understand is that a Taser is one piece of equipment a wildlife first responder can use,” he said. “It’s another tool.”

Using a Taser means biologists don’t have to use tranquilizers, which can be dangerous or deadly for the animal.

“It takes away the safety issues involved with using drugs,” Lewis said.

The department does not endorse the use of a Taser as a primary means of defense from an attacking animal, Lewis said.

Contact staff writer Tim Mowry at 459-7587.

Comments
(15)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Rowdy214
|
April 13, 2011
I'm originally from Tennessee, and I have to admit that this seems like something they would outlaw back home for the drunken rednecks going after deer or black bear. Maybe I'll feel more at home here with this kind of thinkin in the state.
Samm_redux
|
April 12, 2011
This is a perfect example of government out of control. Is tasing moose by hunters (or photographers as the story suggests) a problem? Has a hunter ever tased a moose? If you can get within 25 feet of the animal to tase it, how is it you were not able to shoot it?

ABSURD!
DarkSideOfTheHill
|
April 11, 2011
Rats! That 50 inch rule had me scared off from hunting moose in 20a. I had a plan to stun the moose and measure it's antlers before I shot it.
Yota99714
|
April 11, 2011
Of course, do as I say, not as I do...

They already have this thing known as 'harassment of wildlife' on the books, of which they didn't issue a citation to themselves for doing.

Big fat DUH to Lewis and the BOG.
gadian
|
April 11, 2011
Sooo...do as you say and not as you do? I still get a huge laugh out of the mental image of a group of you guys standing around trying to taser that moose and her just looking at you like you're idiots. All that planning, the coordination, getting exactly in the right spot, but no one having any clue what they were doing.
Hmph
|
April 11, 2011
@Fairbanksgas - your comment made my day!

Tasing/tasering (WTF?) a wild animal is about as effective as charging it with a notebook ready to papercut the thing to death.
Yota99714
|
April 11, 2011
Just because you ree-turds at the AKF&G lacked any sense about tasering a moose doesn't give you the right to impose your stupidity on the rest of us.

Thanks for giving us another reason to laugh at you.

Some of us actually have some sense.
Alaskaman100
|
April 11, 2011
MJE - you realize a taser has a maximum effective range of 100 feet??? One would have to be very stealthy to get that close to a moose. Could do it, especially if they are distracted by your lilacs or garden but not typical poacher behavior. Poachers typically aren't stealthy or quiet. They run around in the dark with big spot lights or on the highways in cars or on rivers with noisy boats. They aren't ninjas.
spicer
|
April 11, 2011
just great. now how am i supposed to get close enough to bludgeon the beast with my baton?
sloughrunner
|
April 11, 2011
Why exactly was Mr. Lewis hazing these critters,where they trying to join his sorority??I say if they are dumb enough to try it let'em have at it. I'm all for selective gene-pool enrichment ...

islandliver
|
April 11, 2011
This would certainly be a winner on America's Funniest Home Videos. And probably would qualify for some of the Alaska movie tax credits. Maybe Sarah could include this in her adventure series.
Fairbanksgas
|
April 11, 2011
Ok the tazer is out, but can we still use nun-chucks or boomerangs?

JoeParks
|
April 11, 2011
Don't Taser a porky pine, a thousand high velocity quills come flying out in every direction, and they look ugly without their quills.
MJEofFairbanks
|
April 11, 2011
I have to say, I honestly never would have thought of tasering a moose.. but now that you mention it...

I suppose it would be a poachers dream.. taser a moose, then dispatch the moose with a knife, nice and quiet like.

Of course, getting close enough to be stomped to death by a pissed off moose when the taser doesn't work, does seem to pose a wrinkle in an otherwise perfect plan.

Wonder if the hospital will see a rise in injuries by moose attacks.

Stay tuned.
Isanova
|
April 11, 2011
Any idiot who decides to taser a bear and walk away... scratch that, any idiot who TRIES to taser a bear at all, deserves the mauling he's going to get.

Don't think a simple civilian taser will protect you... it may only enrage the animal. If you're not big on carrying a firearm, bear-quality pepper spray as well as common sense camping is your best bet. Call up fish and wildlife for advice if you are a novice.
Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.