Alaska seeing impact of climate change in its infrastructure, villages
by Molly Rettig / mrettig@newsminer.com
Jan 30, 2011 | 8891 views | 85 85 comments | 27 27 recommendations | email to a friend | print
FAIRBANKS — Climate change has already begun to make life difficult for state transportation managers. And they expect it to become a bigger and more expensive challenge if warming trends continue as predicted.

“With over 6,600 miles of coastline and 80 percent of the state underlaid by ice-rich permafrost, you can certainly imagine we are at the forefront of climate change impacts,” said Mike Coffey, maintenance and operations chief for the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities.

Coffey discussed the impact of climate change on transportation in a webinar last week, hosted by the Alaska Center for Climate Assessment and Policy at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. New challenges include warming permafrost, coastal erosion and the potential for more dramatic storms and flooding, he said. These could lead to more highways and facilities cracking, icing up or even washing away. The hardest-hit areas are northern, western and Interior Alaska, where roads and structures are built over permafrost and near the coast.

Overall trends

Climate data show Alaska has warmed in the past century and is likely to continue warming. Some regions and seasons will experience more warming than others, according to UAF climate research. The research, by Scenarios Network for Alaska Planning, projects average monthly temperatures for different communities using international climate models and predicted greenhouse gas levels. In Fairbanks, for example, the average January temperature climbed approximately three degrees from the late 1990s to this past decade. It’s projected to go up about two more degrees in the next two to three decades.

Climate change looks more dramatic in a place like Newtok, a Yupik village on the west coast of Alaska. Average January temperatures rose about six degrees from the 1960s to last decade. They are projected to climb another two to three degrees by 1940 and approximately five additional degrees by 2060.

The effects of warming

Melting permafrost is the biggest challenge for roads and infrastructure, Coffey said.

“Permafrost is essentially a function of average annual temperature. If average annual temperature goes above the freezing point, eventually you’ll see changes,” said Nancy Fresco, coordinator at Scenarios Network for Alaska Planning.

In most of the nation, roads deteriorate when pavement wears out. But in Alaska, permafrost often gets them first.

Melting permafrost causes pavement to sink and often crack.

“Gravity tends to move material down to fill the void, and we get a depression in the road,” Coffey said.

Severe melting can make roads as wavy as ribbons, as seen on sections of Goldstream and Chena Hot Springs roads.

“This increases maintenance costs and impacts the DOT budget,” Coffey said.

The state spends roughly $11 million per year dealing with permafrost-affected roads and has for about eight years, he said.

The more remote the infrastructure problems, the more expensive they are to fix. While gravel or crushed aggregate used for reconstruction might cost $20 per yard in Anchorage or Fairbanks, it can cost up to $400 per yard in Newtok or $1,000 per yard in Savoonga, Coffey said.

The freeze-thaw cycle is another enemy.

“We’re expecting those to get worse and expand farther across the state,” he said.

In Fairbanks, fall traditionally turns to winter quickly and temperatures typically remain below the freezing mark until April. But lately, the transition has lasted longer.

“We get snow, and it warms up,” Coffey said.

Irregular warm spells during early winter cause events like the freezing rain storm in November that blanketed Fairbanks in ice.

These events force planners to manage roads differently.

“One thing we’re implementing next winter in Fairbanks is an anti-icing program,” Coffey said. “That’s something that has never had to happen in the Interior before.”

Warmer falls also have delayed sea ice formation along coastlines. Without sea ice protection, waves hammer the shoreline during storms.

“Even without increased storm intensity, just with normal weather patterns, if you lose sea-fast ice you get massive coastal erosion,” Fresco said.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has identified 180 communities in Alaska threatened by erosion, Coffey said.

Newtok, the Yupik village on the west coast of Alaska, is “basically being eaten away by erosion of the shoreline,” Coffey said.

Its dump site and barge landing have already eroded away, and houses are next.

Shishmaref, located on an island in the Chukchi Sea, lost 125 feet of beach in a single storm in 1997, he said.

“Many years ago this would have been unheard of,” he said.

Changing weather patterns

Scientists predict climate change will produce increased storms and flooding in the next 50 years.

You can’t blame specific weather events on climate change, Fresco said.

But Coffey described how increased flooding and storms (if they occur) would impact transportation managers, using recent disasters as examples.

The Yukon ice jam in 2009 was preceded by an extremely cold winter, high snowpack and above-average ice pack in the river.

“In mid to late May, temperatures rose into the 80s. We had this unseasonably hot temperature in the Interior. All of a sudden the ice started moving,” Coffey said.

The flooding of Taylor Highway last summer was triggered by three huge rainfalls (equivalent to a typical year’s worth of rain) in July. The rain set off landslides above and below the road.

The road, and access to Eagle, was shut down for more than a month.

What DOT is doing

Managing the statewide impact of climate change ranges from adjusting plowing strategies to relocating entire communities.

Newtok is moving to an island eight miles away on higher ground. To this end, the state built a barge landing facility and an evacuation road at the new site and it is designing an airport plan. The move is estimated to cost $130 million.

In other areas, DOT has transplanted airports and improved drainage systems on arteries like the Steese and Taylor highways.

And in many places, DOT simply tries to keep permafrost frozen, Coffey said.

This can be achieved by pouring deeper fills for roads to insulate the ground underneath. Engineers might also use larger rocks on highway embankments to allow air to circulate, chilling the ground.

Crews currently plow snow onto the shoulder of roads or runways, which insulates the shoulder and prevents frost from penetrating.

They are experimenting with clearing the shoulders to allow cold to penetrate deeper.

Adapting to the future

Transportation managers are designing new infrastructure that can adapt to future impacts of climate change.

That could mean larger culverts, more bridge spans or siting structures like airports higher, above flood zones.

And, for communities near oceans and rivers, that means making buildings that can be relocated if needed.

Contact staff writer Molly Rettig at 459-7590.
Comments
(85)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
childofsol
|
February 01, 2011
stones

I completely agree with your latest post.

Getting back to this UN thing, do you have some concrete examples of cities or towns where the institution of these programs was brought about by people outside the municipality?

5smoothstones
|
January 31, 2011
One of the beautiful things about America is our freedom of speech. I don't have to agree with another's point of view. Thankfully we don't live in a country with harsh domination.

Egypt is de-energizing cell phone and internet communication. Their citizens are rioting. They've had enough of oppression and their plight being ignored.

I accept and acknowledge that others have different worldviews. I presume we all want the same things. Respect, Freedom, Security.

There is a way to accomplish this.
Invictus
|
January 31, 2011
I blame Rush and Palin for childofsol's incivility.
childofsol
|
January 31, 2011
"Enough rope to hang yourself" is just an expression, not meant literally of course.

Were there really that many jabs? I'm sorry. You must not have a heart of stone.
5smoothstones
|
January 31, 2011
Rope to hang myself?

I've let pass quite a few jabs from you Sol. You began sometime ago with "head full of rocks" and the disparagement continues.

We can agree to disagree and be respectful, or not.

childofsol
|
January 31, 2011
stones

You've put out about three times as much rope as you needed to hang yourself with.

LostAlaskan99712
|
January 31, 2011
"Yes some preparation by our government agencies may have prevented SOME of these events from being worse, but at what cost and to what overall effect?"

Ummm, what cost? I dunno, how much is a human life worth? [at least to people like you]. The effect of the governments actions during those outbreaks was the prevention of virus pandemics.
LostAlaskan99712
|
January 31, 2011
Where's the "absolute proof" that humans have zero impact on our environment? (Since y'alls excuse to keep polluting is that there's no [immediate] evidence that human waste effects our finite atmosphere.)

It's about the health of the atmosphere WE ALL NEED TO LIVE, you can't breathe money, or crude oil for that matter.

In fact, everyone who thinks that industry is more important than the atmosphere we all live in should seal themselves inside a concrete box with nothing but crude oil and hundred dollar bills, then see how long you survive.

Crude oil has been very useful, people have made allot of money off it. Yet extracting crude remains a very expensive, time consuming, ineffecient operation that is much more beneficial for the producer than it is for the consumer. Alternative energy sources are a direct threat to big oil/coal (hence the reason why companies like BP have been dabbling in "green" energy), so don't expect oil to get any cheaper, like ever.

We are bearing witness to the beginning of the end of the "crude era", it will be public demand (not "liberal agenda") that will usher in the new age of renewable energy sources.

commomsense
|
January 31, 2011
We have weather data for just over 100 years. a drop in the bucket as far history goes. Are we now going through a warming trend, it appears so. This is not unusual. We were just told 20 years ago that we were going to have another ice age, what happened?

We had the HUGE aids scare that was going to infect us and kill us all. Next was the swine flu, then the bird flu.

Yes some preparation by our government agencies may have prevented SOME of these events from being worse, but at what cost and to what overall effect?

LostAlaskan99712
|
January 31, 2011
"More than likely"= GOSSIP.

5smoothstones
|
January 30, 2011
Sustainability:

“Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class – involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, air-conditioning, and suburban housing – are not sustainable.” – Maurice Strong, Rio Earth Summit 1992

"Many of the commenters on this forum have argued that we must drill as much as possible because we (the US) NEED a high rate of oil consumption. If NEEDS had not been met, there wouldn't be sixty years of increasing sprawl, mostly single-family dwellings, extremely high rates of meat consumption, and a proliferation of personal transport and disposable goods."

Child of Sol, 8/10/10 FDNM comments,

Stop our oil addiction Leasing NPRA would help fuel climate warming

Quite a similarity.
5smoothstones
|
January 30, 2011
And again another like the other, quote.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development prepared a progress report for the U.N. Conference on Human Settlements in 1995, which describes in great detail the features of the “national policy on human settlements.” Here is a sample:

"...Community Sustainability Infrastructures [designed for] efficiency and livability that encourages: in-fill over sprawl: compactness, higher density low-rise residential: transit-oriented (TODs) and pedestrian-oriented development (PODs): bicycle circulation networks; work-to-home proximity; mixed-use-development: co-housing, housing over shops, downtown residential; inter-modal transportation malls and facilities ...where trolleys, rapid transit, trains and biking, walking and hiking are encouraged by infrastructures."[7]

Wow- Vision Fairbanks. And we thought we reached this consensus locally. Can you say manipulation? Deciept?
1BullMoose
|
January 30, 2011
The news story reads like a press release. I wish the reporter would cite the original source.
1AhHa
|
January 30, 2011
Currently it is 7°F at my location.

and I do appreciate global warming because it could be -50°.

I've lived up here before global warming was ever conceived as a con job. The roads buckled and heaved then, just as they do today. The buckling and heaving has to do with the expansion and contraction of materials, especially asphalt, as the temperature swings from ninety some degrees in the summertime to -65 in the winter.

Poor maintenance combined with poor construction specifications result in poor lifespan.

About twenty years ago, DOT rebuilt Chena Hot Springs Road. There was a place where the asphalt cracked and fell in within thirty days.

Needless to say, the people living off federal spending glommed onto global warming as an excuse for more spending.

As for the permafrost melting – hooray! Some day Alaska's chief agricultural product might be grain crops rather than pot and subdivisions.

midusdew
|
January 30, 2011
brrrrr it's -8F

wtf
DHT3
|
January 30, 2011
I just realized! Overpopulation is the issue! Don't you see? Humans emit green house gases out their backsides! If this trend of overpopulation continues the only thing we'll have left to breath is METHANE!
5smoothstones
|
January 30, 2011
Here's another like the other.

From the United Nations Conference on Human Settlements in 1976,

"Land...cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes. The provision of decent dwellings and healthy conditions for the people can only be achieved if land is used in the interests of society as a whole. Public control of land use is therefore indispensable...."[1]

5smoothstones
|
January 30, 2011
Here's a quote that showcases the kind of socialist mentality we're faced with. FNSB is a participating member of ICLEI and APA.

Single family homes and business structures that already exist when a community is transformed to sustainability are a special problem, since they rarely meet the criteria required by the comprehensive plan. APA's Legislative Guidebook offers a new solution for this problem: "Amortization of Non-Conforming Uses." This means that a city or county may designate a period of time in which existing structures must be brought into conformity with the new regulations.

"But for homeowners who live in a community that adopts the Guidebook's vision, the APA amortization proposal means the extinguishing, over time, of their right to occupy their houses, and without just compensation for loss of that property. How long they have before they must forfeit their homes would be completely up to the local government." (21)

5smoothstones
|
January 30, 2011
I'm amused because of the communities nationwide that embrace and promote sustainability. Some openly admit and promote the UN's agenda 21 and some vehemently deny it.

Sustainability/ICLEI/UN. We're saying the same thing with different words.

Should anyone care to read a few choice quotes.

http://www.newswithviews.com/DeWeese/tom162.htm

Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.