Alaska tax break initiative will be on 2012 ballot
by Molly Rettig / News-Miner
Jan 02, 2011 | 4791 views | 12 12 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
FAIRBANKS — Alaska voters will decide in 2012 whether local governments can increase property tax exemptions.

An initiative that started locally has been recently approved by the state and will appear on the ballot during the next primary election. The proposition would allow cities or boroughs to give homeowners a bigger tax break.

Laws in Fairbanks allow taxpayers who own a home and live there for at least half the year to deduct $20,000 from its assessed value when paying taxes. If voters approve the new measure, the Fairbanks North Star Borough could raise the exemption to $50,000.

The measure would not force municipalities to increase exemptions but would instead let communities determine their levels. It also would let local governments adjust the exemption for cost of living.

The initiative was sponsored by Borough Assemblywoman Nadine Winters. It grew from an earlier attempt to raise exemptions and an older effort to lower property taxes for homeowners.

In 2007, Winters and then-Mayor Jim Whitaker sponsored an initiative to raise the maximum exemption from $20,000 to $100,000. The Borough Assembly appropriated $150,000 in 2007 to pay for signature gathering to get the question on the ballot. They later withdrew that initiative application. But in summer 2009 they began gathering signatures to raise the exemption to $50,000.

The initiative failed in June when sponsors fell short of the 32,734 statewide qualified signatures that were required.

This year, supporters of the initiative gained 34,421 signatures from 40 different house districts.
Comments
(12)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
AMarcusYoung
|
January 03, 2011
Will the ballots be counted by the ANC? Or, will the taxpayer get to decide?
Yota99714
|
January 03, 2011
kpjlaw, how many of those sigs were those of property owners v. renters? Any way to tell.

I don't like the notion of paying 'rent' to the Borough on a place I own, but also realize that infrastructure needs to be paid for somehow; don't think folks would cotton too well to pitching their garbage into the Tanana like they did in the old days.

As soon as you utter the words 'sales tax' around these parts, everybody screams bloody murder.

My questions are also reflected in abowman's response.
Theabowman
|
January 03, 2011
I'm not sure that I support this. Sure, it would be nice to get a break on my property taxes. But would it be zeroed out by in increase in the taxes on vacant land that I own? Would mom and pop businesses that are just hanging on get their taxes hiked? Or, heaven forbid, is this a backdoor prelude to another try at a property tax? The money to run the borough has to come from somewhere, so if homeowners share is reduced, then where is that shortfall going to land?
kelieff
|
January 03, 2011
"This is just another shell game move. The only real fix is to remove private residence property taxes. People should not owe indefinitely on a home they own."

I whole-heartedly agree! Because we are all just renters to the City of Fairbanks until then. If we don't pay our taxes they can take our home.
dodakid
|
January 03, 2011
Why is it that all voters get to vote on bond issues that raise the property taxes for people that own property. How about only letting the people that own property vote on raising their taxes. Better still lets go to using a local sales tax to fund the bond issues.
kpjlaw
|
January 03, 2011
I am so pleased to see this story. I assisted the Fairbanks North Star Borough as a volunteer attorney on this initiative. When the initial rejection took place with 32,734 signatures, I filed suit in Anchorage to support the initiative. Jacobus v. State of Alaska, Division of Elections, Alaska Superior Court Case No. 3AN-10-9850 CI. The problem was that the State had rejected entire petition signature booklets. After the suit was filed, the State allowed certain minor errors to be corrected, which resulted in additional booklets being counted and sufficient signatures validated. The result was that the signers' right to submit this initiative to the voters of Alaska was protected. Many thanks to the Office of the Alaska Attorney General, the Division of Elections, and the Lieutenant Governor for this result. Also, thanks to Katharine Molly Nelson and her signature-gatherers for the large number of signatures collected statewide, and the Fairbanksians who supported and assisted in this effort. Now, the initiative needs to be passed to allow greater local control over the taxation of residential property. Work is still ahead of us.
Plebeian
|
January 03, 2011
This will change very little. They'll just raise the mill rate to compensate. The number of businesses is much smaller than the number of residences, and most businesses (with property) are valued at much more than the average home. Their rates will go up very little, but homeowners will still have to pay close to what they do now.

This is just another shell game move. The only real fix is to remove private residence property taxes. People should not owe indefinitely on a home they own.
islandliver
|
January 03, 2011
What we need is massive support for any ideas that will allow home owners who live here a lower property tax.

Private residence are fairly easy to establish the fair market value while rental and business properties have lots of room for interpretations of what the value might be. Home owners therefore pay what is a tax based on accurate values why other owners get by with a less than equatable valuation in many cases.
BigOldMooseHunter
|
January 03, 2011
Add on to that initiative the ability for local governments also to tax churches for their landholdings, and BOMH would call it Highly Commendable
Shokd
|
January 03, 2011
Why are tax breaks a matter for voting...

But tax increases are not?

Larmex
|
January 03, 2011
Why is it that when "they" wish to raise taxes they can do it a one meeting and one vote, but when it comes to lowering taxes it takes YEARS???
Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.