Sexual abuse trial of ex-pastor starts with victim's testimony
by Chris Freiberg / cfreiberg@newsminer.com
Nov 05, 2010 | 7936 views | 60 60 comments | 20 20 recommendations | email to a friend | print
FAIRBANKS — A teenage girl told a jury Thursday of how a once popular pastor manipulated her into carrying on a sexual relationship with him last year.

The teen was the first witness called in the trial of Shawn Anthony Justice, 32, the former pastor of Corinthian Baptist Church who has pleaded not guilty to 12 counts of second-degree sexual abuse of a minor. Each count of the class B felony carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison.

The girl detailed how Justice revitalized the church when he took over in 2007, expanding membership and getting long-time members more active in the church.

While she knew him from lock-ins at the church and her time with the dance team, it wasn’t until 2008 when she was 14 that Justice began to text her, first on her friend’s phones, and then her first cell phone, which her parents allowed her to purchase with that year’s Permanent Fund dividend.

“I thought it was cool to be able to talk to him,” she said. “He was the youth pastor. I didn’t really have feelings for him.”

The News-Miner does not identify victims of sex crimes.

Though the teen had to return her cell phone to her parents at night, she would often delete the texts. It wasn’t until November 2008 when she took the phone to a sleep over without her parent’s permission that they quickly confiscated the phone and discovered the first texts between her and Justice.

Justice, who had been removed as the church’s pastor three months earlier, had asked the teen to come over to his apartment to shower with him.

“(The mother) looked at this text and she probably got one of the shocks of her life,” prosecutor Gayle Garrigues told the jury in her opening statements.

She went to the police the next morning. While police agreed the texts were inappropriate, they said they were not illegal. The family stopped going to Corinthian Baptist Church and monitored the teen’s phone use even more closely, but that wasn’t enough to keep her and Justice apart.

At school, at the library, she continued to e-mail him. Around the beginning of the summer of 2009, they arranged their first sexual encounter. She snuck out of her house early one morning and rode her bike to Jillian Square where Justice lived and they had their first sexual encounter.

“I don’t remember why, like the actual transition,” she said. “I couldn’t tell you how it transitioned.”

She said Thursday she met Justice three more times that summer. Justice’s attorney, Nelson Traverso questioned her several times about sometimes contradictory statements she made about Justice.

Last year, she told investigators she first had sex with Justice in the winter, and her account of the activities she engaged with in Justice has some times changed. She said at the time she was more hesitant to talk about what had occurred.

In October 2009, she confided to one of her friends what had been going on. That friend in turn told her mother who told the teen’s mother. The police were alerted again, but this time, their investigation culminated in a March indictment.

Justice’s trial continues this morning.

Superior Court Judge Michael McConahy has ruled the jury of seven men and seven women, including two alternates, will also hear about Justice’s 2003 misdemeanor conviction in Virgina for contributing to the delinquencey of a minor.

In that case, Justice, then 24 years-old and a choir director, had sex with a 15-year-old member of the choir.

Contact staff writer Chris Freiberg at 459-7545.
Comments
(60)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
BudO_Fairbanks
|
November 07, 2010
I realize that sex is a natural act, stemming from natural urges, and we live in a pretty uptight society here in the U.S.- BUT... a 35 year old who desires to have sex with a 14 year old is a mentally unstable person- also known as a PEDOPHILE.

This is NOT a natural act. If this situation seems OK to you, then you too, are a PEDOPHILE, or at least are sympathetic to PEDOPHILES. Sorry- denial is a hard thing to overcome.

It seems like the state of Virgina is very lenient towards sex offenders- contributing to the delinquencey of a minor? Really?

This time this man's nasty perversions will bring a stiffer penalty.
BudO_Fairbanks
|
November 07, 2010
What if this girl was 11? Would you still feel the same way, 1BM? What if a 9 year old suggested a sexual encounter with a 35 year old....still consentual sex?

Is it the premeditation that makes you assume this child "asserted her adulthood"?

This wasn't a 16 year old who fell in love with her 18 year old classmate. This was an intelligent 14 year old, with childish romantic notions and raging hormones, and a 35 year old man, who's job was to guide (often confused, and vulnerable) youth. Not only did he betray the trust of those he was supposed to be guiding, but knowingly committed an act he knew (from previous experience, mind you) to be illegal. Period.
AlaskaBorn
|
November 07, 2010
You’re right BM, various societies have set the age of maturity in many differently. Often the average lifespan influences the age of maturity. Joan of Arc lived in a time when the average lifespan was approximately 30. At 14, a person was nearly middle aged.

You live in a society that defines the victim (and I do mean victim) as a child. Your dismissal of this societal norm leads me to believe that you are a sociopath. Your obvious intelligence is a common attribute of sociopaths.

Nothing anyone says to you will change your opinion, and you will continue to dismiss them in your mind. Let me leave you with a thought that you may be able comprehend; the people who feel constrained by society will reject your view. If you indulge in sex with an undocumented adult (we call them children), even if he or she “was asking for it” life as you know it may come to an end.

Just ask S.A. Justice about his experience.

BTW, spare me the “I stand by my prior comments” comment. We get it.

1BullMoose
|
November 07, 2010
« akmom7 wrote on Sunday, Nov 07 at 02:51 PM »

She was only 14. What age does 1BM think is acceptable for a child to "consent"?

----

I must confess my reference to Joan of Arc and Alexander the great was to obtuse.

Clarification: Both historical figures by our standards were under age neither could buy a cigarette. Nor, have a drink. They were leaders who made a mark on history

In my judgment, Joan of Arc represents "woman's" potential

We do not all mature precisely on our 16th birthday nor on our 21st or even on our 50th.

In this case, according to what was reported about her sworn testimony the young lady consented, help plan, took the effective action to evade parental supervision/control to assert her free will as an adult to participate in a tryst.

"At school, at the library, she continued to e-mail him. Around the beginning of the summer of 2009, they arranged their first sexual encounter. She snuck out of her house early one morning and rode her bike to Jillian Square where Justice lived and they had their first sexual encounter. "

Whether any of you like it or not, she asserted her adulthood.

I judge from several of your bigoted comments and represented by juvenile name-calling reminiscent of fifth graders, more than one of have a lot to learn about reality and human behavior.

-------

I stand by my prior comments.

carlad
|
November 07, 2010
Thank you to all on this forum for your input.

It is so refreshing to hear all these comments.

Keep loving and protecting our precious precious

children.As we are truly privileged to have them in our lives:)
carlad
|
November 07, 2010


1BullMoose

I notice that the only hatemonger in this discussion is actually YOU!

So that being the equation here;I feel no obligation to answer even remotely your remarks addressed to me.

My, my, you are so very angry.You behave as though deprived of any loving relationships in your life, because you seem so incapable of decent basic discourse.

There is a saying...

"Hurt people,hurt people."

So I truly feel sorry for you, because in my opinion, you fit this description.

May you experience true contentment and inner peace in this lifetime:)

Peace.

akmom7
|
November 07, 2010
Joan of Arc and Alexander the Great, seriously?!?! Ridiculous comparisons to our kids today, good grief... Our over-sexualized, media driven, child coddling society has many kids living at home until they are mid-20s! In my day we moved out to college, work world or the military at age 18. If anything we have given dangerous and mind numbing technologies to youth who are much more immature than days past. And I read with nutrition puberty is coming earlier and earlier. Recipe for disaster... immature and hormonal! Perfect for predators...
LadyNYC
|
November 07, 2010
Or could it be, 1bm, that you're Justice himself, or a defense attorney. Nah, no lawyer could be as willfully ignorant of the law.

Yes, we all mature at different ages. The law remains firm that the age of consent is 16, however.

And this girl was not mature for her age. She stated that she didn't know when the transition [between platonic to sexual] occurred. A more mature individual would have been clearly aware of such a transition. And, what else did she not know? How can decisions be considered rational when there's such a dearth of knowledge?
LadyNYC
|
November 07, 2010
Gender reversal doesn't make things any more legal, or appropriate.

You're pretty much hopeless, 1bm.

And from the looks of it, a sociopathic pedophile.
1BullMoose
|
November 07, 2010
« akmom7 wrote on Sunday, Nov 07 at 02:51 PM »

She was only 14. What age does 1BM think is acceptable for a child to "consent"?

----------

In this case, the girl actively participated in planning the tryst over a period of months, she bought a cell phone with her own money to maintain contact and spite of parental efforts and left she left house to participate without the consent or knowledge of her parents.

This suggests to me, she rationally consented.

I note it takes a lot of intelligent planning and mental effort ( IQ ) to deceive your parents, especially when they suspect you.

-------

Regarding your question, I have nothing to offer.

My comments are solely based on this news report/story.

-------

"She was only 14."

We mature at different ages.

Example:

Joan of Arc at age 19 died.

"Saint known as the Maid of Orléans; French name Jeanne d'Arc. ?1412--31, French national heroine, who led the army that relieved Orléans in the Hundred Years' War, enabling Charles VII to be crowned at Reims (1429). After being captured (1430), she was burnt at the stake as a heretic."

---------

Alexander the Great at age 20 conquered Greece

356--323 bc, king of Macedon, who conquered Greece (336), Egypt (331), and the Persian Empire (328), and founded Alexandria

akmom7
|
November 07, 2010
She was only 14. What age does 1BM think is acceptable for a child to "consent"?
1BullMoose
|
November 07, 2010
"« LadyNYC wrote on Sunday, Nov 07 at 01:56 PM »

Pearl=w to the rescue, spelling out the law in black and white.

It continues to amaze me, 1bm, that you refuse to acknowledge how the victim was harmed. You refuse, in fact, to see her as a victim."

-------

@#$%^& A rational thought! Has been stated

"You refuse, in fact, to see her as a victim."

Aside from your OPINION based on your political agenda's advocacy posture.

I did not see anything in the story reporting her testimony --- suggesting she was a victim.

This is your opinion based on your prejudices and imaginary facts.

Were your ever a teenager? Did you ever lie to your parents? Date someone they did not approve of?

Claim you were older than your actual age?

----------

Your political argument that it is always the "man's" fault is patently false.

More more over it is a slur on all women who exercise free will when making their mating choices.

---------------

As a footnote when older women has a tryst with teenage boy I have the same opinion they willingly consent.



LadyNYC
|
November 07, 2010
Pearl=w to the rescue, spelling out the law in black and white.

It continues to amaze me, 1bm, that you refuse to acknowledge how the victim was harmed. You refuse, in fact, to see her as a victim.

For starters, 16 is the age of consent in Alaska. Based on that, had Justice waited one more year, he wouldn't be sitting in a court room, he wouldn't be on trial, and this story wouldn't be in the news for us to comment on.

Even if Justice had waited that year, it wouldn't make his actions any less reprehensible. As Pearl pointed out, its precisely because teens have raging hormones that these laws exist - to protect them. True, no one held a gun to her head, she wasn't forced to do anything. But she also didn't have the knowledge and experience to understand that Justice's advances were predatory in nature. When he started texting her when she was 14, she couldn't have guessed that this was all part of his plan to molest her.

He took advantage of the girl's youth and lack of knowledge. He influenced her to violate her parents' rules. He took over a year to build her trust in him, and thereby lured her away from the protective control of her parents. He got her involved in an unhealthy, illegitimate, and secretive relationship with him that likely deterred her from developing a far more healthy relationship with someone her own age. He got her involved in an *illegal* relationship resulting in her having to disclose intimate details to a room full of strangers in a courtroom. I can only imagine the deep shame and humiliation she must feel. It will likely take her years to heal from this.

He was a man of the cloth who abused his position within the community and within the church to prey on one of its most vulnerable members.

He caused psychological and emotional wounds to this girl that could take many years and thousands of dollars in therapy to heal.

Justice deeply hurt the victim in many ways. He should be held accountable for all the injury he has inflicted. To not see this is to be as much of predator, as much of a monster, as Justice is.
Pearl=W
|
November 07, 2010
The reason why there is an age limit for legal sexual consent is that "the hormone cloud" does indeed affect the judgement of young people when it first hits them, they have no prior experience, and their judgement can be quite immature.

That's why we, as a society, insist that **adults** be responsible for controlling themselves and their own hormones in such situations. It's really not all THAT difficult for an adult male [in this case] to know which types of actions are over the line, and control themselves.

Whether her 'hormones were raging' and whether she 'consented' or co-operated is quite beside the point [he's not being charged with forcable rape]. The statutory rape, sexual assault on a minor, laws exist because it can usually be assumed that teenagers will have hormonal urges not yet fully under the control of good judgement abilities, and because of that can be easily manipulated.
1BullMoose
|
November 07, 2010
"« LostAlaskan99712 wrote on Sunday, Nov 07 at 09:19 AM »

bullmoose- obviously you don't know why it's illegal for a full grown adult to TAKE ADVANTAGE of a minor who isn't even old enough to have a drivers license. This pervert knew exactly what he was doing, nobody forced him to start texting a juvenile girl. Normal men don't ask underage girls to come shower with them."

----------------

Have you considered the question. Maybe she was taken advantage of him?

And from the story. She participated willingly with considerable forethought, investing her dividend running deceiving her parents sneaking out of the house. Per her own statements.

I will ask you the same questions that I posed to Lady NYC.

They are as follows:

Did the hormone fog ever cloud your judgment?

Did you ever lie to your parents about your romantic interest?

Did you ever do anything wrong when you were a teenager?

Did you follow or participate in the social customs when you were a teenager?

Just some food for thought questions..

Do others have freedom of speech, freedom of thought and opinion? Or are these freedoms exclusive to you?

And last but least, are you equally bigoted regarding other issues?

LostAlaskan99712
|
November 07, 2010
bullmoose- obviously you don't know why it's illegal for a full grown adult to TAKE ADVANTAGE of a minor who isn't even old enough to have a drivers license. This pervert knew exactly what he was doing, nobody forced him to start texting a juvenile girl. Normal men don't ask underage girls to come shower with them.

You sound like just as much of a pervert as the accused.
1BullMoose
|
November 07, 2010
« carlad wrote on Sunday, Nov 07 at 05:22 AM »

"He texts kids and has them visiting him."

------------------

And exactly where did you get this information?

It certainly is not mentioned in the news story.

Regarding hatemongering.

If the shoe fits wear it.

Or delete your name calling innuendos/insinuations.

1BullMoose
|
November 07, 2010
« LadyNYC wrote on Sunday, Nov 07 at 06:53 AM »

I last wrote on this thread yesterday morning, in response to 1bullmoose. My comment was deleted, but at the end of writing it, I was so disgusted, so nauseated, that I wanted to throw up by the time I finished writing.

etc.

----

I did not have your comment removed because I am fairly tolerant of vicious hatemongering by those who do not have a valid argument.

You seem to have an unusually intense emotional involvement in this news story. May I respectfully suggest taking several deep breaths and counting to 10, and asking yourself- why?

------------------

"He views this story of Justice's sexual abuse of this 15 year old girl as merely a romantic tryst gone bad."

It is not a matter of what I think it is a matter of what the girl testified in court, according to the news story. She testified to the following:

She used the dividend money to buy a cell phone to help maintain contact...

She thwarted her parents efforts at intervention.

They jointly planned the tryst.

She carried out the plan by sneaking out of the house.

This is from the story:

"At school, at the library, she continued to e-mail him.

Around the beginning of the summer of 2009, they arranged their first sexual encounter.

She snuck out of her house early one morning and rode her bike to Jillian Square where Justice lived and they had their first sexual encounter. "

Based on this information, it was a mutual arrangement.

Therefore I cannot see sending the guy to jail for 10 years for something they both participated in. I note that she is not being tried for breaking the law.

------------------

LadyNYC were you ever a teenager?

Did the hormone fog ever cloud your judgment?

Did you ever lie to your parents about your romantic interest?

Did you ever do anything wrong when you were a teenager?

Did you follow or participate in the social customs when you were a teenager?

Just some food for thought questions..

And last but least, are you equally bigoted regarding other issues?

LadyNYC
|
November 07, 2010
I last wrote on this thread yesterday morning, in response to 1bullmoose. My comment was deleted, but at the end of writing it, I was so disgusted, so nauseated, that I wanted to throw up by the time I finished writing.

Bullmoose thinks he's messing with all our heads by what he writes. And he's correct. I can't put my finger on it, but there's something about the tone of his words that makes me think he's enjoying his ability to shock people with his thoughts. He views this story of Justice's sexual abuse of this 15 year old girl as merely a romantic tryst gone bad.

Words fail me.

There's got to be a lot of us reading this who wonder who the heck 1bullmoose really is. For he is the enemy among us. Please tell us who you are, 1bm, so that we may better protect the children within our care and within our influence, so that they remain well outside your predator's crosshairs.

Or, please absolutely remove yourself society so that we won't have to worry about you to begin with.

You won't do either.

1bm, get that vile smirk off your face. People like you, like Justice, because of the way you think, because there are no boundaries to how you would behave sexually, people like you are a grave threat to society. Our children are your targets, in your crosshairs? Just know that you're in ours.

Gotta ask yourself this, 1bm ... while your at your keyboard, thinking you're so clever, how many people are reading what you write? What are their skills and talents? How many detectives are reading your words? How many lawyers, how many computer science majors with top-notch hacking skills? Everything leaves a trace in cyberspace. Everything leaves an electronic signature. And eventually you anonymous child molestors will be smoked out of your predatory hiding holes.

Mazeltov. Glory be.

carlad
|
November 07, 2010
1BullMoose You said

Well I see the hate mongers are back.

Your last post before this comment was Sat @ 4:05pm

So you are calling me a hatemonger?(you did say hatemongerS)

Hate has nothing to do with it buddy!

Facts are facts.People do not welcome pedophiles with open arms you know;even the incarcerated see this as a heinous crime against humanity.This guy has a past with adding to the delinquency of a minor.He texts kids and has them visiting him.

And unless you are pedophile yourself,nobody in their right mind agrees with grown adults exploiting kids and taking sexual advantage of them.

As to my lawyer comment.I have zero hatred against Nelson.I just shared my opinion.

And I don't care whether you are impressed or not.I gave my opinion because I am sharing my thought process on a public blog.As you are.

Before you call people hate mongers, you may want to think about what folk are actually talking about .

Which is OUR CHILDREN here in Fairbanks.

Peace to you.

Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.